Skip to main content
PMC home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1990 Jun;104(3):489–497. doi: 10.1017/s095026880004749x

The avidity of specific IgM detected in primary rubella and reinfection.

H I Thomas 1, P Morgan-Capner 1
PMCID: PMC2271777  PMID: 2347387

Abstract

An IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rubella-specific IgM was used to assess the avidity of specific IgM by comparing the results obtained with and without a mild protein denaturant in the washing fluid used after incubation of IgM with rubella haemagglutinating antigen. An avidity index (AI) was calculated with AIs less than 50% considered to indicate low avidity. Sera from recent primary rubella, rubella reinfection and from patients persistently reactive for specific IgM were tested. Urea and diethylamine (DEA) were compared as the protein denaturants. Twenty-six of 28 sera from cases of primary rubella gave an AI less than 50% with DEA, compared with 25 of 28 with urea. Seventeen of 20 sera from cases of reinfection gave an AI greater than 50% with DEA whereas only 14 of 20 had a similarly high avidity with urea. Eight of 10 sera from 4 cases of persistent specific IgM reactivity gave AIs greater than 50% with DEA, although this was reduced to 5 when urea was used. Thus a difference has been demonstrated between the avidity of specific IgM in primary infection from that demonstrated after a secondary antigenic challenge (reinfection). This may help in serologically distinguishing primary infection from reinfection.

Full text

PDF
489

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Best J. M., Palmer S. J., Morgan-Capner P., Hodgson J. A comparison of Rubazyme-M and MACRIA for the detection of rubella-specific IgM. J Virol Methods. 1984 Feb;8(1-2):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(84)90044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hedman K., Rousseau S. A. Measurement of avidity of specific IgG for verification of recent primary rubella. J Med Virol. 1989 Apr;27(4):288–292. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890270406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huchet R., Feldmann M. Studies on antibody affinity in mice. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Jan;3(1):49–55. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lehtonen O. P., Meurman O. H. An ELISA for the estimation of high-avidity and total specific IgG and IgM antibodies to rubella virus. J Virol Methods. 1982 Sep;5(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(82)90091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morgan-Capner P., Hodgson J., Hambling M. H., Dulake C., Coleman T. J., Boswell P. A., Watkins R. P., Booth J., Stern H., Best J. M. Detection of rubella-specific IgM in subclinical rubella reinfection in pregnancy. Lancet. 1985 Feb 2;1(8423):244–246. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91027-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mortimer P. P., Tedder R. S., Hamblig M. H., Shafi M. S., Burkhardt F., Schilt U. Antibody capture radioimmunoassay for anti-rubella IgM. J Hyg (Lond) 1981 Apr;86(2):139–153. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400068856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Shea S., Best J. M., Banatvala J. E., Shepherd W. M. Development and persistence of class-specific antibodies in the serum and nasopharyngeal washings of rubella vaccinees. J Infect Dis. 1985 Jan;151(1):89–98. doi: 10.1093/infdis/151.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pattison J. R. Persistence of specific IgM after natural infection with rubella virus. Lancet. 1975 Jan 25;1(7900):185–187. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarvas H., Mäkelä O. Haptenated bacteriophage in the assay of antibody quantity and affinity: maturation of an immune response. Immunochemistry. 1970 Nov;7(11):933–943. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(70)90054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas H. I., Morgan-Capner P. Rubella-specific IgG subclass avidity ELISA and its role in the differentiation between primary rubella and rubella reinfection. Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Dec;101(3):591–598. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800029459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomas H. I., Morgan-Capner P. Specific IgG subclass antibody in rubella virus infections. Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Jun;100(3):443–454. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800067182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Webster R. G. The immune response to influenza virus. 3. Changes in the avidity and specificity of early IgM and IgG antibodies. Immunology. 1968 Jan;14(1):39–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Werblin T. P., Siskind G. W. Distribution of antibody affinities: technique of measurement. Immunochemistry. 1972 Oct;9(10):987–1011. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(72)90110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu C. Y., Cinader B. Dose- and time-dependent changes in the binding capacity of IgM antibody. Eur J Immunol. 1972 Oct;2(5):398–405. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830020503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES