Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Epidemiology and Infection logoLink to Epidemiology and Infection
. 1991 Dec;107(3):527–535. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800049220

Evaluating the sensitivity and predictive value of tests of recent infection: toxoplasmosis in pregnancy.

A E Ades 1
PMCID: PMC2272097  PMID: 1752302

Abstract

The diagnosis of maternal infection in early pregnancy depends on tests which are sensitive to recent infection, such as specific IgM. Two types of test are considered: those where the response persists for a period following infection and then declines, such as IgM, and those whose response increases with time since infection, such as IgG-avidity. However, individuals vary in their response to infection, and it may not always be possible to determine whether an infection occurred during pregnancy or before it. Mathematical methods are developed to evaluate the performance of these tests, and are applied to the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. It is shown that, based on existing information, tests of recent infection are unlikely to be both sensitive and predictive. More data on these tests are required, before they can be reliably used to determine whether infection has occurred during pregnancy or before it.

Full text

PDF
527

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Frenkel J. K. Diagnosis, incidence, and prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Sep;144(9):956–958. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150330014008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hedman K., Lappalainen M., Seppäiä I., Mäkelä O. Recent primary toxoplasma infection indicated by a low avidity of specific IgG. J Infect Dis. 1989 Apr;159(4):736–740. doi: 10.1093/infdis/159.4.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ho-Yen D. O. Toxoplasmosis in humans: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1990 Sep;83(9):571–572. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Joss A. W., Chatterton J. M., Ho-Yen D. O. Congenital toxoplasmosis: to screen or not to screen? Public Health. 1990 Jan;104(1):9–20. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80340-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Joss A. W., Skinner L. J., Chatterton J. M., Chisholm S. M., Williams H. D., Ho-Yen D. O. Simultaneous serological screening for congenital cytomegalovirus and toxoplasma infection. Public Health. 1988 Sep;102(5):409–417. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(88)80078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koskiniemi M., Lappalainen M., Hedman K. Toxoplasmosis needs evaluation. An overview and proposals. Am J Dis Child. 1989 Jun;143(6):724–728. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150180106030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McCabe R., Remington J. S. Toxoplasmosis: the time has come. N Engl J Med. 1988 Feb 4;318(5):313–315. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198802043180509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stepick-Biek P., Thulliez P., Araujo F. G., Remington J. S. IgA antibodies for diagnosis of acute congenital and acquired toxoplasmosis. J Infect Dis. 1990 Jul;162(1):270–273. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.1.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES