Abstract
Classical quorum-sensing (autoinduction) regulation, as exemplified by the lux system of Vibrio fischeri, requires N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) signals to stimulate cognate transcriptional activators for the cell density-dependent expression of specific target gene systems. For Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii, a bacterial pathogen of sweet corn and maize, the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) stewartan is a major virulence factor, and its production is controlled by quorum sensing in a population density-dependent manner. Two genes, esaI and esaR, encode essential regulatory proteins for quorum sensing. EsaI is the AHL signal synthase, and EsaR is the cognate gene regulator. esaI, ΔesaR, and ΔesaI-esaR mutations were constructed to establish the regulatory role of EsaR. We report here that strains containing an esaR mutation produce high levels of EPS independently of cell density and in the absence of the AHL signal. Our data indicate that quorum-sensing regulation in P. s. subsp.stewartii, in contrast to most other described systems, uses EsaR to repress EPS synthesis at low cell density, and that derepression requires micromolar amounts of AHL. In addition, derepressed esaR strains, which synthesize EPS constitutively at low cell densities, were significantly less virulent than the wild-type parent. This finding suggests that quorum sensing in P. s. subsp. stewartii may be a mechanism to delay the expression of EPS during the early stages of infection so that it does not interfere with other mechanisms of pathogenesis.
Many Gram-negative bacteria control the expression of specific gene systems in a population-dependent manner by a regulatory mechanism known as autoinduction or quorum sensing (1). At the core of this process are self-produced signals, commonly called autoinducers, which when available at or above intrinsic threshold concentrations, enable cognate transcriptional effectors to activate otherwise silent genes (for recent reviews, see refs. 1–4). The autoinducer signals from diverse bacteria are generally N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs), which differ in the length and substitution of their respective acyl side chains (5–7).
AHL-mediated quorum sensing first was described for the luminous symbiotic marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri. In this system, expression of the lux operon, which encodes enzymes involved in light production, requires at least two proteins, LuxI and LuxR. LuxI is the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (HSL), the primary AHL produced by V. fischeri (8, 9). LuxR is a transcriptional activator that requires the AHL coinducer to initiate the expression of the lux-encoded functions (3). Analogous AHL-dependent activation mechanisms govern Ti plasmid conjugal transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens (10), the expression of virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11), the induction of antibiotic biosynthesis in P. aureofaciens (12) and Erwinia carotovora (13), exoenzyme synthesis in E. carotovora (14), and the expression of functions important in root nodulation and growth inhibition in Rhizobium leguminosarum (15). Additional bacterial quorum-sensing mechanisms are described in other recent reviews (1–4, 16, 17).
Quorum sensing controls the production of the capsular polysaccharide stewartan by Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (18) [this bacterium formerly was named Erwinia stewartii (19)]. P. s. subsp. stewartii is the causative agent of Stewart’s wilt of sweet corn and leaf blight of maize. Wilt symptoms and lesions on mature leaves are the result of blockage of xylem elements by bacterial extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) (20, 21). The stewartan biosynthetic pathway is encoded by the cps gene cluster (22), and mutations at this locus generally lead to loss of pathogenicity (23). The regulation of cps gene expression is complex and involves a number of transcriptional factors. Some of these resemble components of classical two-component signal transduction systems homologous to and cross-functional with the Rcs transcriptional activators required for colanic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli (24–26). However, for stewartan synthesis, the Rcs regulatory cascade appears to be secondary to a master control mechanism mediated by EsaR. EsaR is a homologue of LuxR that requires N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL to function (19). The enzyme responsible for AHL production is encoded by the esaI gene, and a mutation in this gene has pleiotropic effects, eliminating AHL production, mucoidy, and pathogenicity (19).
Previous observations suggested that EsaR, in contrast to all known LuxR-type transcriptional activators, may function as a negative regulator in absence of the AHL signal (19). We report here genetic evidence that confirms this prediction. Specifically, we show that a wild-type P. s. subsp. stewartii strain synthesizes EPS in a cell density-dependent manner, and that mutations in esaR, either alone or in combination with an esaI mutation, lead to growth-independent synthesis of EPS; these mutant strains produce capsules and slime constitutively, even at low cell density. In contrast, a mutation in the esaI gene alone that eliminates AHL signal production abolishes EPS synthesis (19). The fact that an esaR mutation leads to full expression of the phenotype, independent of AHL, constitutes classical genetic proof that EsaR operates as a negative regulator of EPS synthesis. We conclude that quorum sensing, mediated by a LuxR-like protein, can operate by a mechanism of repression rather than by gene activation. The precise molecular basis for EsaR-mediated negative regulation of EPS synthesis is currently under investigation.
Because our data suggested that EPS production in planta might require a critical population density, we evaluated the pathogenicity of esa mutants in plant inoculation assays. We report here that the strains with a mutated esaR gene, which produce EPS constitutively, induced significantly less wilting in sweet corn than the parent strain. We therefore propose that quorum sensing in P. s. subsp. stewartii may play a role in delaying the production of EPS so that it does not interfere with, or limit, early disease development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions.
P. s.subsp. stewartii strains used were DC283 (wild type) (23); ESN51 (esaI∷Tn5seqN51) (same as ESVB51, ref. 19); ESΔR (esaRΔHpaI–PstI); and ESΔIR (esaI/esaRΔKpnI). A. tumefaciens strain NT1(pDCI41E33) served as the indicator strain for AHL detection (27). E. coli strains were DH5α (28), S17–1 (29), and 2174 (pPH1JI) (30). Broad host range vector pRK415 (31) was used for cloning the esaI/esaR locus, and a derivative plasmid, designated pRK415K, was modified to remove the KpnI cloning site in preparation for the KpnI-specific esaI/esaR deletion mutagenesis. The suicide plasmid pKNG101 (32) served as vehicle to introduce deletion mutations into the P. s. subsp.stewartii chromosome by allelic replacement. Luria–Bertani broth, CPG broth (1% Difco peptone, 1% glucose, 0.1% Difco casamino acids), nutrient agar, and culture conditions were described previously (19, 22, 23).
TLC Assay to Detect AHLs.
The TLC assay for AHLs was performed as described by Shaw et al. (33). This assay uses the indicator strain A. tumefaciens NT1(pDCI41E33) for visualization of the various autoinducers. One milliliter of culture supernatant was extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate, and a 1-μl aliquot of this extract was applied to a C18 reverse-phase TLC plate (Whatman KC18F Silica Gel 60 Å, catalog no. 4803–800). The synthetic AHL standards were a gift from P.D. Shaw (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Deletion Mutagenesis and Allelic Replacement.
A mutation in the esaR locus was created by deletion of the HpaI–PstI fragment within the esaR coding region (nucleotides 1977–2582 as shown in Fig. 1A). The mutated DNA was cloned into the suicide vector, pKNG101 to create plasmid pSVB40 (Fig. 1C). This plasmid then was mobilized into P. s.subsp. stewartii strain DC283 and stable KmR transconjugants, resulting from integration of the plasmid, were selected. Growth on 5% sucrose subsequently selected for excision of pKNG101. Southern blot hybridization was used to screen for and verify allelic replacements.
A double-mutation within esaI and esaR was created by deleting the 581-nt KpnI fragment that spans the 3′ coding regions of both genes (Fig. 1A). The mutated DNA fragment was cloned into pKNG101 to create plasmid pSVB33 (Fig. 1D). This mutation then was introduced into P. s. subsp. stewartii strain DC283 as above. Allelic replacement of the esaI/esaR deletion was confirmed by Southern blot analysis.
Quantitative Measurement of EPS Production.
Cultures of P. s. subsp. stewartii strains were grown in Luria–Bertani broth overnight. The cells then were washed twice in equal volumes of 0.9% NaCl and diluted 10-fold in 0.9% NaCl. About 108 cells were used to inoculate 2-liter flasks containing 400 ml of CPG broth (23). EPS was recovered from 800 ml of a culture of grown to an OD560 of 0.1, 400 ml grown to an OD560 of 0.2 and 0.3, and 200 ml grown to an OD560 of 0.4 and 0.6. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 30 min. The unbound EPS present in the culture supernatant was precipitated from 40 ml of spent medium with three volumes of absolute ethanol. To recover the capsular EPS fraction bound to the bacterial cells, the cell pellets were resuspended in 50 ml of high-salt buffer (10 mM KP04, pH 7.0/15 mM NaCl/1 mM MgS04) and blended in an Omni Mixer at setting 5 for 30 min at 0°C. Cells were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min. Dislodged EPS was precipitated from the supernatant with three volumes of ethanol. The EPS precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min and then resuspended in 10 ml of sterile H2O. The amount of total carbohydrates contained in each sample was determined by the phenol/sulfuric acid method (34) followed by spectrophotometric analysis at wavelength 488 nm using a standard curve prepared from known quantities (10–100 μg) of d-glucose. The cfu/ml in each sample was determined by plating serial dilutions of cell suspensions on nutrient agar plates. The data represented in Fig. 2A are from three separate experiments.
Virulence Assays on Sweet Corn Seedlings.
Sweet corn seedlings (Zea mays cv. Seneca Horizon) were grown in a mixture of peat, field soil, and fine vermiculite (1:1:1) in a controlled environment chamber at 29°C, 90% relative humidity, 16-h light and 8-h dark cycle, 355 μE⋅m−2⋅sec−1 light intensity. They were inoculated at 8 days after planting by using the eyelet end of a sewing needle, which delivered 1 μl of inoculum containing 1 × 106 cells. Pseudostems were wounded twice at right angles ca. 1 cm above the soil line. Eighteen to 20 plants were inoculated with each strain. Symptom severity was rated on the following scale: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = a few restricted lesions; 2 = scattered water-soaking symptoms; 3 = numerous lesions and slight wilting; 4 = moderately severe wilt; 5 = death.
RESULTS
Growth Phase-Dependent Analysis of EPS and AHL Synthesis.
We previously established that the esaI/esaR locus encodes elements essential for autoinduction regulation of EPS synthesis in P. s. subsp. stewartii (19). A general feature of such regulated phenotypes is that their expression is cell density dependent. However, there were no previous indications of such a growth dependence for EPS synthesis in P. s. subsp.stewartii. We therefore measured the amount of EPS produced by strain DC283 at different stages of growth. Cultures were inoculated by using less than 106 cells/ml and grown for 15–24 h to reach densities between 1 × 107 and 5 × 108 cells/ml. The results are summarized in Fig. 2A, which shows that strain DC283 typically yielded 0.1 pg EPS/cell during the early stages of growth; only after reaching ca. 2–3 × 108 cells/ml did EPS production increase to 1.1 pg /cell, indicating that induction of EPS synthesis occurred during late log phase.
We also determined the pattern of AHL production during growth and the concentration of signal required to promote EPS synthesis. Ethyl acetate extracts of supernatants of bacterial cultures grown to various cell densities were separated and analyzed by TLC as detailed above. The major AHL species produced by P. s. subsp.stewartii was N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL (Fig. 3A). It was detectable even at low cell densities (OD560 = 0.05) and accumulated linearly with growth. Only negligible amounts of the N-3-oxooctanoyl-l-HSL, another common autoinducer, could be detected in high-density cultures (OD560 ≥ 0.3). We estimated the amount of AHL by using the method of Shaw et al. (33). The N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL produced by strain DC283 accumulated in a linear fashion during growth in CPG medium (Fig. 3B). The minimum concentration of AHL required for EPS synthesis was ca. 2 μM, which occurred when cultures reached an OD560 of 0.3 (2–3 × 108 cells/ml) (Fig. 3 A). When strain DC283 was grown in CPG medium that was supplemented with 2 μM synthetic N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL, EPS production occurred at 5 × 107 cells/ml (OD560 = 0.1), whereas unsupplemented cultures grown to this same density remained repressed for EPS production (data not shown).
Mutagenesis of the esaR Locus and Genetic Evaluation of Mutant Strains.
We previously reported that EPS synthesis in the esaI∷Tn5seq mutant (Fig. 1B), ESN51, is impaired because of the deficiency in AHL synthesis. This finding indicated that EPS production in P. s. subsp.stewartii is AHL dependent (19). To determine the role of the linked esaR gene in this process, we created an esaR mutation by deleting an 875-nt HpaI–PstI fragment, which removed the promoter of this gene along with an extensive portion of the coding region (pSVB40, Fig. 1C). This mutation was transferred into the chromosome of wild-type P. s. subsp. stewartii strain DC283 by allelic replacement. The resulting esaR mutant, designated ESΔR, was evaluated for its ability to synthesize AHL and EPS. The TLC plate in Fig. 4 contained 20-fold concentrated samples of ethyl acetate extracts from culture supernatants of strains DC283, ESΔR, and ESN51. This assay shows that DC283 and ESΔR produced virtually identical types and amounts of AHLs. These two strains differed, however, in the manner by which they regulate EPS synthesis. Strain ESΔR exhibited a supermucoid phenotype not only on CPG medium but also on nutrient agar, which does not normally stimulate slime production in DC283 (Fig. 2 A and B). In addition, ESΔR synthesized fully induced levels of EPS during the early stages of growth when DC283 remains repressed (Fig. 2A).
Construction and Characterization of an esaI/esaR Double-Mutant.
Because the ΔesaR mutant produced normal levels of AHL, it was possible that EsaR is not involved in regulating EPS synthesis. To further investigate the role of EsaR as a cognate regulator for quorum-sensing control of EPS synthesis, we created a double-mutation in the esaI/esaR locus by deleting an internal 521-nt KpnI fragment encompassing the 3′ portions of both genes (Fig. 1D). Because this deletion removes the putatitive DNA-binding domain of EsaR, the truncated protein is unlikely to function as a gene regulator. The mutation, carried on plasmid pSVB33, was introduced into the chromosome of strain DC283 by allelic replacement. The resulting mutant, designated ESΔIR, was tested for AHL and EPS production. As shown in Fig. 4, strain ESΔIR did not make detectable amounts of AHL, because of the esaI mutation. More significantly, strain ESΔIR exhibited the same supermucoid phenotype as strain ESΔR (Fig. 2 A and B), indicating that an esaR mutation bypasses the need for AHL. This finding was in contrast to strain ESN51 (esaI−/esaR+), which also is deficient in AHL synthesis (Fig. 4), but remained repressed for EPS production even when grown on CPG medium (Fig. 2 A and B). Table 1 summarizes the phenotypes associated with the wild-type and esa strains evaluated in this study.
Table 1.
Strain | esaI/esaR* | AHL synthesis | EPS† production | Pathogenicity‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|
DC283 | + + | + | + | 4.0 |
ESN51 | − + | − | − | 0.1 |
ESΔR | + − | + | +++ | 1.1 |
ESΔIR | − − | − | +++ | 2.6 |
+ indicates that the strain contains a wild-type allele of esaI/esaR; − indicates a mutated allele.
The strain produces wild-type, cell density-dependent levels of EPS (+), no EPS; (−); and constitutive, supermucoid levels of EPS (+++) (see Figs. 2 and 5).
Symptoms on sweet corn seedlings were rated at 10 days on a five-point scale as described in the text.
Comparative Virulence of Wild-Type and esa Strains of P. s.
subsp. stewartii. Because the virulence of P. s. subsp. stewartii has been correlated with EPS production (35) and hrp gene function (36), and esaI mutants were less virulent than cps mutants, we were interested in determining what effect early overproduction of stewartan would have on virulence. Sweet corn seedlings were inoculated with 106 cells of DC283 (esa+), ESN51 (esaI), ESΔR (ΔesaR), and ESΔIR (ΔesaIR) by wounding the stem. Symptoms were rated at intervals up to 13 days after infection (Fig. 5). The wild-type strain was fully virulent, producing water-soaked lesions after 4 days and completely wilting the plants by 10 days. In contrast, the esaI mutant was completely avirulent and unable to cause either lesions or wilting. The two esaR mutants were intermediate in virulence; the ΔesaR mutant was able to produce some lesions, but not systemic wilting, whereas the ΔesaIR mutant could cause only a few scattered lesions. Relative areas under the disease progress curves shown in Fig. 5 were 35.6, 1.3, 11.5, and 26.5 for DC283, ESN51, ESΔR, and ESΔIR, respectively. Bacteria reisolated from infected plants retained their original Esa phenotypes. The differences in virulence between esaΔR mutants and the wild type strain were not apparent at higher inoculum levels (>107 cells/plant, data not shown). Likewise, in water-soaking assays, where bacterial suspensions in 0.2% Tween 40 were dropped into whorls of 8-day-old seedlings (22), the mutants were indistinguishable from each other and the parent strain in their ability to incite water-soaked lesions (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
Selective, cell density-dependent gene expression is an inherent feature of quorum-sensing regulated phenotypes. We reported that EPS production in P. s. subsp. stewartii is regulated by an autoinducer produced by EsaI (19); yet, there were no previous indications that EPS synthesis was, in fact, growth dependent. The results of this study demonstrate that wild-type P. s.subsp. stewartii produces appreciable EPS only after its population reaches 2 × 108 cells/ml. At this stage, the intrinsic AHL concentration is ca. 2 μM and consists primarily of N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL. Although subnanomolar concentrations of N-3-oxooctanoyl-l-HSL were also present, we believe that this autoinducer has little effect on EPS synthesis, because addition of 2 μM synthetic N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL alone fully induced EPS production in DC283 at low cell density. This is not to discount the possibility that minimal levels of N-3-oxooctanoyl-l-HSL, or even yet unidentified AHLs, may play a role in some aspect of quorum-sensing regulation. We also found that the accumulation of AHL in cultures was linearly correlated with bacterial growth, which strongly implies that AHL biosynthesis is constitutive and not autoinduced. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that an esaR mutation has no affect on the synthesis of N-3-oxohexanoyl-l-HSL (Fig. 4). This finding contrasts with other quorum-sensing systems, including the Lux paradigm system, in which full expression of the AHL synthase gene requires induction by the AHL coinducer and the cognate regulator.
The most significant finding of this study is that EsaR behaves genetically as a repressor, unlike all other LuxR-like regulators, which function as transcriptional activators. The ΔesaR and ΔesaIR mutants synthesize EPS constitutively at all cell densities examined. If EsaR were to function as a transcriptional activator required for expression of the cps operons, these same mutations should have a loss-of-function (EPS−) phenotype. Additional evidence that EsaR acts a negative regulator comes from the phenotype of strain ESN51. This mutant is deficient in AHL synthesis as a result of an insertion in esaI, but it carries a wild-type allele of esaR. The presence of a functional EsaR protein in the absence of AHL leads to stringent repression of EPS synthesis in this strain, regardless of cell density; and significantly, this strain remains uninduced in EPS synthesis even on the CPG medium, which strongly induces the synthesis of EPS by the wild-type strain (Fig. 2B). This repression is readily relieved by addition of AHL to the culture (19).
The finding that EsaR is a negative regulator is particularly intriguing given the structural similarity between EsaR and LuxR-type activators and the differential biophysical and molecular criteria for transcriptional repressors and activators. For example, if EsaR functions as a repressor, directly controlling the cps operons, then it must assume a DNA-binding conformation in the absence of the AHL coinducer and a conformation unsuited for DNA binding in the presence of AHL. Just the opposite appears true for the typical LuxR-type activators (37, 38). Comparison of the amino acid sequence of EsaR with several of LuxR-class proteins does not reveal any salient structural differences that could account for these gross mechanistic differences. In fact, the amino acid sequence within the putative N-terminal AHL-binding domain and the predicted C-terminal helix–turn–helix structure are remarkably conserved among all these proteins (1, 2, 19). It could be argued that EsaR may function both as a transcriptional repressor in absence of AHL and as an activator in its presence. We feel, however, that this is an unlikely scenario because esaR deletion mutations lead to a fully induced, supermucoid phenotype at all cell densities. Thus, an activating role of EsaR in this context could be minimal at best.
At this point the only known lux box-like palindrome sequence in P. s. subsp. stewartii is located in the promoter region of esaR, where it overlaps and includes the −10 promoter consensus sequence. No apparent lux box-like elements have been identified in the DNA sequence of the cps gene cluster, which encodes all of the known structural genes for the biosynthesis of EPS. This may mean that EsaR does not directly act on the cps genes, but may instead operate at the other end of a regulatory cascade, such as the Rcs regulatory circuit previously described in E. coli (24) and P. s.subsp. stewartii (25). It is conceivable that EsaR governs the expression of one of the rcs genes, or else functions posttranslationally by limiting or interfering with the ability of RcsA-RcsB dimers to activate cps transcription. Similarly, a number of additional regulatory components influence the overall expression of the cps-encoded functions; any one of these may be potential targets for control by EsaR. Experiments are in progress to define the precise molecular role of EsaR as a regulator of EPS synthesis.
Stewartan is an important virulence factor for P. s.subsp. stewartii during the later stages of pathogenesis. It is thought to hold water and nutrients in the intercellular spaces after water soaking has been elicited in the leaves, and it provides hydrostatic pressure to disrupt plugged xylem vessels and separate parenchyma cells to facilitate the spread of bacteria within plant tissues. Wilting occurs when EPS plugs the xylem pit membranes. The virulence of P. s. subsp. stewartii cps mutants and field isolates has been correlated with EPS production and colony type (22, 35); lack of EPS usually results in loss of the ability to move systemically in the plant and causes severe wilting, although some nonmucoid strains still can incite limited water-soaked lesions. The almost complete avirulence of the esaI mutant in this study was comparable to that of an rcsB mutant (data not shown) and can be explained by its inability to produce EPS. Conversely, stimulating EPS production by increasing the copy number and expression of rcsA does not alter virulence, even though such strains overproduce EPS on Luria–Bertani agar (D.L.C., unpublished work). Therefore we were interested to determine whether esaR mutants, which also overproduce EPS, would behave similarly. It was surprising to find that they were greatly reduced in virulence and failed to move systemically throughout the plant when wound inoculated at fairly low inoculum levels (<106 cells/plant). However, they still could cause water soaking in the whorl assay and wilting at high inoculum dosages (>107 cells/plant). At this point, we cannot account for why the ΔesaR mutant was less virulent than the ΔesaIR mutant, but it may be because of a difference in infectivity, because the difference is not apparent at higher inoculum levels or in the whorl assay. These findings suggest that during the initial stages of pathogenesis EPS could be a hinderance to the pathogen, and quorum sensing could be an important means of delaying its production. Two steps in the infection process that may be affected by early EPS production are initial movement of bacteria through the xylem and elicitation of water soaking by the Hrp/Wts proteins. In the field, Stewart’s wilt is spread primarily by the corn flea beetle, which introduces the pathogen into the xylem and intercellular spaces of the leaves through wounds made when it feeds. The small number of bacteria that enter the xylem this way then must spread throughout the plant. At this stage of colonization, they may not be able to traverse pit membranes if they are fully capsulated. The next step in pathogenesis is probably the injection of Hrp/Wts pathogenicity proteins into host cells by a hrp-encoded type III secretion system (36) to cause cell death and release of nutrients. This transfer process requires cell-to-cell contact and could be very inefficient in the presence of a thick capsule or slime layer. It will be interesting to learn whether quorum sensing is a general mechanism for controlling the production of pathogenicity factors, or whether it is more a means to sense diffusion-limited surroundings that the bacteria encounter in a plugged xylem vessel or crevices between plant cells.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. E. Conrad for his expert suggestions in isolating and quantifying bacterial polysaccharides; Dr. P. D. Shaw for the gift of synthetic AHLs; and Drs. J. M. Clark, Jr., A. Smyth, and C. Fuqua for helpful suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by Grant AG95–37303–1711 from the S.B.v.B./U.S. Department of Agriculture.
ABBREVIATIONS
- AHL
N-acylhomoserine lactone
- EPS
extracellular polysaccharide
- CPG
casamino acids/peptone/glucose
- HSL
homoserine lactone
References
- 1.Fuqua W C, Winans S C, Greenberg E P. J Bacteriol. 1994;172:269–275. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fuqua W C, Winans S C, Greenberg E P. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:727–751. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sitnikov D M, Schineller J B, Baldwin T O. Mol Microbiol. 1995;17:801–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17050801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Swift S, Throup J P, Williams P, Salmond G P C, Stewart G S A B. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21:214–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eberhard A, Burlingame A L, Eberhard C, Kenyon G L, Nealson K H, Oppenheimer N J. Biochemistry. 1981;20:2444–2449. doi: 10.1021/bi00512a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eberhard A, Widrig C A, McBath P, Schindler J B. Arch Microbiol. 1986;146:35–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00690155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schaeffer A L, Hanzelka B L, Eberhard A, Greenberg E P. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2897–2901. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.10.2897-2901.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hanzelka B L, Greenberg E P. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:5291–5294. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.17.5291-5294.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Engebrecht J, Nealson K H, Silverman M. Cell. 1983;32:773–781. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Piper K R, Beck von Bodman S, Farrand S K. Nature (London) 1993;362:448–450. doi: 10.1038/362448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Passador L, Cook J M, Gambello M J, Rust L, Iglewski B H. Science. 1993;260:1127–1130. doi: 10.1126/science.8493556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pierson III L S, Keppenne V D, Wood D W. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:3966–3974. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.13.3966-3974.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McGowan S, Sebaihia M, Jones S, Yu B, Bainton N, Chan P F, Bycroft B, Stewart G S A B, Williams P, Salmond G P C. Microbiology. 1995;141:541–550. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-3-541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pirhonen M, Flego D, Heikinheimo R, Palva E T. EMBO J. 1993;12:2467–2476. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05901.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gray K M, Pearson J P, Downie J A, Boboye B E A, Greenberg E P. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:372–376. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.2.372-376.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bassler B L, Silverman M R. In: Two-Component Signal Transduction. Hoch J A, Silhavy T J, editors. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1995. pp. 431–445. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Salmond G P C, Golby P, Jones J. In: Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Daniels M J, Downie J A, Osbourn A E, editors. Boston: Kluwer; 1994. pp. 13–20. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mergaert J, Verdonck L, Kersters K. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:162–173. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beck von Bodman S, Farrand S K. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:5000–5008. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.17.5000-5008.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Braun E J. Phytopathology. 1982;72:159–166. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bradshaw-Rouse J J, Whatley M A, Coplin D L, Woods A, Sequeira L, Kelman A. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981;42:344–350. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.2.344-350.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coplin D L, Majerczak D R. Mol Plant–Microbe Interact. 1990;3:286–292. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dolph P J, Majerczak D R, Coplin D L. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:865–871. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.2.865-871.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gottesman S, Stout V. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:1599–1606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Torres-Cabassa A, Gottesman S, Frederick R D, Dolph P J, Coplin D L. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:4525–4531. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.10.4525-4531.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gottesman S. In: Two-Component Signal Transduction. Hoch J A, Silhavy T J, editors. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1995. pp. 253–262. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cook D M, Li P-L, Ruchaud F, Padden S, Farrand S K. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:1291–1297. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.4.1291-1297.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Ed. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A. Bio/Technology. 1983;1:37–45. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Beringer J E, Beynon J L, Buchanan-Wollaston A V, Johnston A W B. Nature (London) 1978;276:633–634. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Keen N T, Tamaki S, Kobayashi D, Trollinger D. Gene. 1988;70:191–197. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90117-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaniga K, Delor I, Cornelis G R. Gene. 1991;109:137–141. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90599-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shaw P D, Ping G, Daly S L, Cha C, Cronan J K, Jr, Rinehart L, Farrand S K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6036–6041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hanson R S, Phillips J A. In: Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology. Gerhardt P, Murray R G E, Costilow R N, Nester E W, Wood W A, Krieg N R, Phillips G B, editors. Washington, DC: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1981. pp. 333–334. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pepper E H. Monograph No. 4. St. Paul, MN: Am. Phytopathol. Soc.; 1967. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alfano J R, Collmer A. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5655–5662. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5655-5662.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Slock J, Kolibachuk D, Greenberg E P. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:3974–3979. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.3974-3979.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stevens A M, Dolan K M, Greenberg E P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12619–12623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]