Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2008 Jan 11;94(8):3198–3207. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.123430

Energy Transfer in the Peridinin-Chlorophyll Protein Complex Reconstituted with Mixed Chlorophyll Sites

Tomáš Polívka *,†, Torbjörn Pascher , Roger G Hiller §
PMCID: PMC2275708  PMID: 18192358

Abstract

We use femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy to study chlorophyll (Chl)-Chl energy transfer in the peridinin-chlorophyll protein (PCP) reconstituted with mixtures of either chlorophyll b (Chlb) and Chld or Chla and bacteriochlorophyll a (BChla). Analysis of absorption and transient absorption spectra demonstrated that reconstitution with chlorophyll mixtures produces a significant fraction of PCP complexes that contains a different Chl in each domain of the PCP monomer. The data also suggest that binding affinity of Chla is less than that of the other three Chl species. By exciting the Chl species lying at higher energy, we obtained energy transfer times of 40 ± 5 ps (Chlb-Chld) and 59 ± 3 ps (Chla-BChla). The experimental values match those obtained from the Förster equation, 36 and 50 ps, respectively, showing that energy transfer proceeds via the Förster mechanism. Excitation of peridinin in the PCP complex reconstituted with Chla/BChla mixture provided time constants of 2.6 and 0.4 ps for the peridinin-Chla and peridinin-BChla energy transfer, matching those obtained from studies of PCP complexes reconstituted with single chlorophyll species.

INTRODUCTION

Photosynthetic performance of all organisms relies on the efficiency of their antenna complexes, which capture sunlight in the form of excitation energy. This excitation energy is transferred to the reaction center where the charge separation takes place. Although only two types of reaction centers are found in the vast diversity of photosynthetic organisms, the variability of antenna complexes is considerable, reflecting different light-harvesting strategies (1). Cyanobacteria and cryptophytes use extrinsic water-soluble phycobilins whose chromophores are linear tetrapyrroles (2). Most membrane-intrinsic antenna complexes utilize (bacterio)chlorophylls ((B)Chl) as major light-harvesting pigments, with carotenoids as supporting pigments covering the spectral region not accessible to (B)Chl (1,36). The water soluble light-harvesting complex of dinoflagellates, peridinin-chlorophyll protein (PCP), is remarkable in using the relatively polar carotenoid peridinin as its main chromophore (7,8). PCP isolated from Amphidinium carterae contains eight peridinins and two Chla molecules in each monomer. Its structure, determined to 2.0 Å resolution, reveals that the pigments are arranged as two very similar clusters of four peridinin and one Chla molecules (9).

The detailed structural knowledge and unique pigment composition of PCP has become a basis for numerous experimental and theoretical studies of energy transfer pathways within the PCP complex carried out in the past decade (see Polívka et al. (8) for a review). These studies demonstrated that energy transfer from peridinin to Chla occurs with nearly 90% efficiency (7,1012). Peridinin contains a conjugated carbonyl group that induces an intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) state into the peridinin excited state manifold (1316). Though the details of coupling between the S1 and ICT states are still unclear and in PCP these two states are assumed to act as one state denoted S1/ICT (1518), the major effect of the ICT state is to make the peridinin excited state dynamics dependent on polarity of the environment (1318). Because the dominating peridinin-Chla energy transfer pathway in PCP occurs via the S1/ICT state (7,1012), it was hypothesized that tuning the polarity of the immediate environment of peridinin molecules may be an important factor enhancing the overall efficiency of peridinin-Chla energy transfer (11,19). The importance of the polarity-induced activation of the ICT state for carotenoid-Chl energy transfer was also shown in other light-harvesting complexes utilizing peridinin or other carbonyl carotenoids. The ICT state actively participates in energy transfer in the intrinsic light-harvesting complex of A. carterae (20), the fucoxanthin-chlorophyll protein from the diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana (21), or even artificial light harvesting antenna utilizing peridinin and fucoxanthin (22).

Besides the peridinin-Chla energy transfer, other studies focused on energy transfer between the two Chla molecules located in separate domains of the PCP monomer. At room temperature, these Chla molecules have slightly different energies (23,24). Fluorescence anisotropy decays monitoring Chl-Chl energy transfer within the PCP monomer are characterized by a time constant of 6 ps that can be successfully modeled by the Förster energy transfer mechanism (25). Essentially the same time constant was obtained from transient absorption data recorded at 20 K (26,27). A discovery of a new PCP form, the so-called high-salt PCP (HSPCP) promoted further studies of Chl-Chl energy transfer. The HSPCP complex exhibits a clear splitting of the Qy bands of Chla at low temperature (26,27). Assuming the Förster mechanism, the splitting of the Qy bands leads to a decrease of spectral overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorption, resulting in a 23 ps time constant for Chl-Chl energy transfer (27). In addition to the change in spectral overlap, the ∼4 times slower energy transfer in the HSPCP is also caused by a weaker Chl-Chl interaction because the Chl-Chl distance in HSPCP is slightly longer than in PCP ((27), and T. Schulte, F. P. Sharples, R. G. Hiller, and E. Hofmann, unpublished. Coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under ID 2C9E.).

A promising method for studying mechanisms of energy transfer is reconstitution of light-harvesting complexes with different pigments (29). This method has been successfully used to monitor spectral overlap dependence of energy transfer between B800 and B850 BChla molecules in the LH2 antenna complex of purple bacteria (30). It has also been used to investigate pigment binding sites and energy transfer in many LHCPs from plants (31). Recent reconstitution of the PCP complexes with heterologously expressed apoprotein and peridinin together with a series of chlorophylls (Chlb, Chla, acetyl-Chla, Chld, and BChla) having various positions of their Qy bands (32) offered another possibility for testing the mechanisms of energy transfer in the PCP complex. Polívka et al. studied dependence of peridinin-Chl energy transfer rate on the position of the Qy band of the Chl acceptor, showing that the S1/ICT-Qy energy transfer rate can be successfully modeled by the Förster mechanism. Interestingly, for chlorophylls having red-shifted Qy band as compared with the Chla, the peridinin-Chl energy transfer was even more efficient than in native PCP (19). This effect was confirmed to occur also at 10 K (33). Although these PCP complexes were reconstituted with a single Chl species, Miller et al. have also demonstrated that reconstitution of PCP with a mixture of two Chl species produces PCP complexes having different Chl species in the two domains of the PCP monomer (32). The existence of PCP monomers with mixed Chl sites was confirmed by measurements of fluorescence and fluorescence excitation spectra (32), as well as by single molecule spectroscopy (24,34,35).

Here we further develop the single molecule spectroscopy studies by directly monitoring the interdomain Chl-Chl energy transfer in the PCP complexes reconstituted with a mixture of Chl species using femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. The observation of energy transfer unequivocally proves the existence of the PCP complexes with mixed Chl sites. Modeling the obtained energy transfer rates by the Förster equation provides further evidence for the Förster mechanism of energy transfer between Chl molecules located in different domains of monomeric PCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample preparation

PCP was reconstituted from heterologously expressed N-domain apoprotein and purified pigments as described in Miller et al. (32). Before experiments, the samples were stored in the dark at 4°C. The optical density of the samples was adjusted by adding a buffer (25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 2 mM KCl) to yield optical density of at least 0.05 at the Qy band maximum in a 2 mm cuvette. For fluorescence and fluorescence excitation measurements, a 1-cm path length quartz cuvette was used and the optical density of the samples was kept below 0.1 OD/cm.

Spectroscopic measurements

Steady-state absorption measurements were performed on a Jasco-V-530 (Easton, MD) spectrophotometer in a 2-mm path length quartz cuvette. Fluorescence and fluorescence excitation spectra were recorded using a Spex Flurolog (HORRIBA Jobin Yvon, Edison, NJ) fluorimeter. Femtosecond measurements were carried out using a femtosecond transient absorption spectrometer described elsewhere (19). The excitation pulses were obtained from pumping an optical parametric amplifier by 800-nm, 130-fs pulses generated in a regenerative amplifier; the probing pulses were generated by focusing a fraction of the regenerative amplifier output into a 0.3 cm sapphire plate. The mutual polarization of the pump and probe beams was set to the magic angle (54.7°). For signal detection, the probe beam and an identical reference beam (that had no overlap with the pump beam) were focused onto the entrance slit of a spectrograph, which then dispersed both beams onto a home-built dual photodiode array detection system. A 2-mm path length quartz rotating cuvette spinning at a rate ensuring that each excitation pulse hits a fresh sample was used to prevent degradation of the sample. Absorption spectra were measured before and after measurements to ensure that no permanent photochemical changes occurred over the duration of the experiment.

Analysis of time resolved spectra

All kinetic traces collected by the diode-array detection system were fitted globally. The data were fitted to a sum of exponentials, including numerical deconvolution of the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the response function, and a fourth degree polynomial describing the chirp. The fitting procedure used general linear regression for the amplitudes of the exponentials and the Nelder-Mead simplex method for the rate constants, the FWHM, and the chirp polynomial. To visualize the excited state dynamics, we used a model with time evolution according to a sequential, irreversible scheme A → B, B → C… The arrows represent increasingly slower monoexponential processes and the time constants of these processes correspond to lifetimes of the species A, B, C… The spectral profiles of the species are called evolution-associated difference spectra (EADS). In complex systems, EADS do not necessarily correspond to difference absorption spectra of particular excited states (36), so we have also applied target analysis for fitting the data obtained after peridinin excitation. For the target analysis, the data were chirp-corrected before the fitting procedure using the chirp polynomial obtained from the global fitting. The rate constants of the target analysis were fitted using the Nelder-Mead simplex method. General linear regression was used to obtain difference spectra of the individual excited states in the target analysis. In accordance with the terminology used by van Stokkum et al. (36), the difference spectra of the time components resulting from target analysis are called species-associated difference spectra (SADS).

RESULTS

Absorption spectra of the PCP complexes reconstituted with either Chlb/Chld or Chla/BChla mixtures normalized to the peridinin absorption at 535 nm are shown in Fig. 1. The reconstituted PCP complexes have chlorophyll Qy bands located at 650 nm and 700 nm (Chlb/Chld mixture), and 672 nm and 790 nm (Chla/BChla mixture). The position of the Qy bands is identical to that observed for PCP complexes reconstituted with a single chlorophyll species (19,32,33), demonstrating successful incorporation of different chlorophyll species. The existence of PCP complexes that have different chlorophyll species in each domain of the monomer is demonstrated by fluorescence excitation spectra shown in Fig. 2. When emission is detected in the spectral region of emission of the chlorophyll with lower energy, at 740 nm for Chlb/Chld mixture and at 815 nm for Chla/BChla mixture, the fluorescence excitation spectra contain a contribution from the chlorophyll lying at higher energy, due to energy transfer between the two chlorophyll species.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Absorption spectra of the reconstituted PCP complex with mixed Chl sites: Chlb/Chld (solid line) AND Chla/BChla (dashed line). Spectra are normalized to peridinin absorption at 530 nm. (Inset) enlargement of the Qy region of chlorophylls.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Fluorescence excitation spectra of the PCP complexes reconstituted with Chlb/Chld (solid symbols) and Chla/BChla (open symbols) mixtures. Detection wavelengths were 740 nm (Chlb/Chld) and 815 nm (Chla/BChla).

The Chl-Chl energy transfer is further corroborated by time-resolved experiments. In Fig. 3, transient absorption spectra recorded for the Chlb/Chld mixture are shown at different time delays after excitation of Chlb at 650 nm. At 0.5 ps after excitation, the transient absorption spectrum exhibits two distinct bleaching bands at 650 nm (Chlb) and 700 nm (Chld). The presence of Chld bleaching is due to a direct excitation of Chld that has a pronounced vibrational band overlapping with the Qy band of Chlb (Supplementary Material, Fig. S1). At longer delays, there is a clear evidence of Chlb-Chld energy transfer as decay of the Chlb bleaching is accompanied by a rise of the Chld bleaching signal. In addition, the Chlb decay can be also followed in the excited state absorption (ESA) signal in the 570–610 nm region where Chlb ESA is markedly stronger than that of Chld. This evolution is finished after ∼200 ps (see kinetics in the inset of Fig. 3). The final transient absorption spectrum taken at 300 ps does not decay within the time window of the experiment because of the nanosecond lifetime of the terminal acceptor (37,38). The final spectrum also contains a contribution from Chlb as reconstitution of PCP with different chlorophyll species produces three classes of complexes composed of Chlb/Chlb, Chld/Chld, and Chlb/Chld monomers ((24,32); see Discussion section for analysis of stoichiometric ratio). Consequently, excitation at 650 nm inevitably excites also PCP complexes with Chlb/Chlb composition. Since these cannot transfer energy to Chld, they are the source of the residual Chlb bleaching signal at 300 ps (see Discussion section for further analysis).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Transient absorption spectra recorded at different delays after 650 nm excitation of the PCP complex reconstituted with a Chlb/Chld mixture. Arrows denote time evolution of the spectral features. (Inset) Kinetics measured at 645 nm (solid symbols) and 700 nm (open symbols). Solid lines represent fits.

Transient absorption spectra recorded for the Chla/BChla mixture after excitation of Chla at 670 nm are shown in Fig. 4. The time evolution of the spectra is comparable with the Chlb/Chld case, though the larger energy separation between the Qy bands prevents direct excitation of BChla at 670 nm, resulting in almost no BChla signal in the transient absorption spectrum recorded at 0.5 ps after excitation. Energy transfer from Chla to Bchla is also manifested at 580 nm where BChla Qx bleaching grows in simultaneously with the BChla Qy bleaching at 790 nm.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Transient absorption spectra recorded at different delays after 670 nm excitation of the PCP complex reconstituted with a Chla/BChla mixture. Arrows denote time evolution of the spectral features. (Inset) Kinetics measured at 675 nm (solid symbols) and 790 nm (open symbols). Solid lines represent fits.

To extract the time constants associated with Chl-Chl energy transfer, we have applied a global fitting analysis. We have excluded the data at time delays <300 fs, because these fast dynamics are due solely to relaxation within the excited state manifold of one chlorophyll species and do not contribute to Chl-Chl energy transfer. Under this approximation, fitting to a single-exponential function was sufficient to obtain good fits for both Chlb/Chld and Chla/BChla PCP complexes. The resulting EADS are shown in Fig. 5. For the PCP complex containing the Chlb/Chd mixture, the initial EADS has a contribution from both Chlb and Chld Qy bleaching. This EADS decays in 40 ± 5 ps to form the final, nondecaying spectrum characterized by the residual Chlb bleaching and increased Chld bleaching as a result of Chlb-Chld energy transfer. Comparable results were obtained for the PCP complex with Chla/BChla mixture (Fig. 5), but the time constant of energy transfer is slower at 59 ± 3 ps.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

EADS resulting from global fitting of data obtained for PCP complexes reconstituted with Chlb/Chld (top) and Chla/BChla mixtures (bottom). n.d., nondecaying component.

For the PCP complex reconstituted with Chla/BChla mixture, we have also studied peridinin-Chl energy transfer after excitation of peridinin at 510 nm (Fig. 6). At subpicosecond time delays, the spectra are dominated by a broad peridinin S1/ICT ESA extending from 550 to 750 nm (8,10,19). However, even at 0.2 ps after excitation, there are obvious dips in the ESA spectrum located at 670 and 790 nm due to the bleaching of the Qy bands of Chla and BChla, consistent with an ultrafast energy transfer channel via the peridinin S2 state. This S2 channel was found to operate with an efficiency in the range of 25–50% in both native (1012) and reconstituted PCP complexes (19,33). Decay of the peridinin ESA, accompanied by a concomitant rise of both Chla and BChla bleaching, monitors energy transfer between peridinin and Chla/BChla. Kinetics recorded at maxima of the corresponding Qy bleaching bands reveal that the peridinin-BChla energy transfer is faster than the peridinin-Chla energy transfer, in accordance with the results obtained for PCP complexes reconstituted with a single chlorophyll species (19). Peridinin-excited state spectral features have essentially disappeared in the transient absorption spectrum recorded at 5 ps, but further spectral evolution is observed in the Chla/BChla bleaching bands as a result of Chla-BChla energy transfer (Fig. 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

(Top) Transient absorption spectra measured after excitation of peridinin at 510 nm for the PCP complex reconstituted with a mixture of Chla and BChla. (Bottom) Kinetics recorded at 672 nm (Chla bleaching, solid symbols) and 790 nm (BChla bleaching, open symbols) normalized to minimum at 10 ps. Inset shows the time evolution of the bleaching signals at a longer timescale that reflects energy transfer between the two chlorophyll species. Solid lines are fits.

The EADS obtained from global fitting are shown in Fig. 7. The first EADS corresponds to the excited state species formed by ultrafast decay of the initially excited peridinin S2 state. It has a characteristic shape of the peridinin S1/ICT-SN transition with Qy bands superimposed on the broad ESA feature. From the magnitude of the Qy bleaching, it may be deduced that the S2 channel is more efficient with BChla as the acceptor. This species decays in 0.5 ± 0.1 ps into the second EADS characterized by a large BChla bleaching, whereas the magnitude of the Chla bleaching band at 670 nm remains nearly the same as in the previous EADS. Further evolution (from dashed to dotted spectrum in Fig. 7) occurs with a 2.9 ± 0.3 ps time constant. The major change is deepening of the Chla bleaching band at 670 nm accompanied by decay of the peridinin ESA, whereas no change is observed for the BChla bleaching band at 790 nm. Consequently, the changes observed during these two steps are consistent with peridinin-BChla and peridinin-Chla energy transfer. The extracted time constants of 0.5 and 2.9 ps are in good agreement with those obtained for PCP complexes reconstituted with a single chlorophyll species (19). The last evolution step characterizes the Chla-BChla energy transfer. The time constant of this step, 59 ps, was extracted from the data obtained after direct excitation of Chla (see above), and was therefore fixed during the fitting procedure.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

EADS resulting from global fitting of the data obtained after peridinin excitation (510 nm) of the PCP complex reconstituted with Chla/BChla mixture. Lifetimes of the individual excited state species are indicated. n.d., nondecaying component.

DISCUSSION

The data presented in the previous section prove that the reconstitution of PCP with two chlorophyll species produces complexes having different chlorophylls in each of the two domains of the PCP monomer, confirming the initial fluorescence data (32) and recent single-molecular spectroscopy experiments (24,35,38). However, it is important to realize that the PCP complexes resulting from reconstitution with chlorophyll mixtures follow a statistical distribution. The bulk sample necessarily consists of three different classes of complexes: 1), those with one chlorophyll species in both domains, 2), those with the other chlorophyll species in both domains, and 3), those with different chlorophyll species in each domain. Statistical distribution of these three classes depends on the total ratio between the two chlorophyll species that can be deduced from magnitudes of the Qy bands in absorption spectra of the reconstituted PCP complexes.

For the PCP complex reconstituted with Chlb/Chld mixture, the intensity ratio of the Qy bands is 0.82 (Fig.1), whereas the corresponding ratio of ɛmax in dichloromethane is 0.57 (Table 1). Though this may suggest significant predominance of Chlb over Chld, the coincidence of the first vibrational band of Chld with the Qy band of Chlb must be taken into account (Fig. S1). Thus, Chld contributes by ∼30% to total absorption at 650 nm. Consequently, for equimolar amount of Chlb and Chld, the ratio of intensities of the Qy bands should be 0.74. Comparing this number with the experimental value of 0.82, it is obvious that the Chlb/Chld ratio in this PCP complex is close to 1, meaning that the bulk sample consists of Chlb/Chlb, Chlb/Chld, and Chld/Chld PCP complexes in the ratio of 1:2:1.

TABLE 1.

Parameters and results of the Förster energy transfer rate calculation

νmax* (cm−1) Γ* (cm−1) ɛ (M−1.cm−1) μ (Debye) κ/R3 (nm−3) V (cm−1) Θ τET** (ps)
Chlb 15410 445 56700 4.86 0.103§ 9.5 2.604 × 10−4 36 (40)
Chld 14330 395 98900 6.27
Chla 14930 375 89800 5.67 12.5 1.073 × 10−4 50 (59)
BChla 12660 460 96000 7.08
*

Maxima and FWHM of the Qy bands were obtained from fitting the Qy bands in the PCP complexes reconstituted with Chl mixtures to a single Lorentzian profile.

Values in dichloromethane, from Kobayashi et al. (46).

Transition dipole moments of the Qy bands obtained from Eq. 4.

§

Mean value taken from the range obtained from analysis of Kleima et al. (25).

Interaction term calculated from Eq. 3.

Overlap integral calculated from Eq. 2.

**

Calculated energy transfer time, the experimental values are given in parentheses.

A different situation occurs for the PCP complex reconstituted with the Chla/BChla mixture. The intensity ratio of the Qy bands is in this case 0.46, despite the fact that both chlorophyll species have comparable extinction coefficients at Qy maximum (Table 1). Since the contribution of BChla to absorption at the wavelengths corresponding to the Qy maximum of Chla (670 nm) is <10% (Fig. S1), we conclude that the Chla/BChla ratio in this PCP complex is close to 0.5. The fact that there is twice as much of BChla leads to a different distribution of PCP complexes in the bulk sample. In this case, the Chla/Chla, Chla/BChla, and BChla/BChla PCP complexes will have a stoichiometric ratio of 1:4:4.

The different stoichiometric ratios have also consequences for the transient absorption experiments. For the PCP complex reconstituted with the Chlb/Chld mixture, the ratio of 1:2:1 implies that excitation at 650 nm affects Chlb molecules that occur in both Chlb/Chlb complexes (33% of the excited complexes) and Chlb/Chld complexes (66%). Since only those excited Chlb molecules occurring in the mixed PCP complexes can transfer energy to Chld, there should be a residual signal corresponding to the 33% of Chlb molecules located in Chlb/Chlb PCP complexes when the energy transfer is completed. Chlb bleaching at 300 ps remains at ∼⅓ of its value at 0.5 ps (Fig. 3) confirming the stoichiometric ratio determined from the absorption spectra. Similar analysis can be carried out for the Chla/BChla PCP complex, in which excitation at 670 nm affects an ensemble containing only 20% of Chla/Chla complexes, whereas the remaining 80% is due to excitation of the mixed Chla/BChla complexes. Again, as can be readily deduced from Fig. 4, the residual Chla bleaching signal at 300 ps is ∼20% of the initial bleaching at 0.5 ps, which is the value expected for the stoichiometric ratio obtained from the absorption spectrum. Since the values of the residual bleaching signal correspond well to the stoichiometric ratio of the complexes that cannot transfer energy, it implies that all excited Chlb (Chla) molecules located in the mixed complexes transfer energy with nearly 100% efficiency to Chld (BChla).

It is useful to compare the stoichiometric ratios with the recent study of binding affinities of different Chl types in PCP (39). Using different molar ratios of Chls for reconstitution, Brotosudarmo et al. showed that both Chlb and acetyl Chla (acChla) have a binding affinity roughly twice of that of Chla (39). Because both Chlb/Chld and Chla/BChla PCP complexes used here were reconstituted with equimolar ratios of Chls, the results obtained here show that Chld has about the same binding affinity as Chlb, whereas BChla has a binding affinity twice that of Chla. Underlying this result is the assumption that the relative absorbances of different chlorophylls in reconstituted PCP are similar to those in organic solvent. This may not be the case for the Chla/BChla pair, because in the PCP complexes reconstituted with single chlorophylls, the peridinin/Qy ratio is slightly higher for Chla (19), indicating that the Qy extinction coefficient of Chla is less than that of BChla in PCP. Consequently the relative binding of BChla is probably less than twice that of Chla. Nevertheless, combining our results and those of Brotosudarmo et al. (39), we conclude that all nonnative Chls used so far for the reconstitution of PCP complexes have a higher binding affinity than the native pigment, Chla. The fact that Chld, BChla, and Chlb have polar substituents in either R1 or R2 position (Fig. S3) supports the conjecture of Brotosudarmo et al. that the increase in binding affinity is due to formation of a Per-Chl hydrogen bond via the polar substituents in R1 or R2 positions (39).

Energy transfer between chlorophylls

Since the reconstitution clearly produces a significant fraction of PCP complexes with mixed chlorophyll sites, it provides an ideal platform for testing the energy transfer mechanism, because it allows tuning the spectral overlap between the donor and acceptor. It is generally accepted that Chl-Chl energy transfer in PCP proceeds via the Förster mechanism (2527). Then, the energy transfer rate (in ps−1) is calculated according to the following equation (40):

graphic file with name M1.gif (1)

where V is the interaction term and Θ is the overlap integral.

The overlap integral Θ is calculated from the emission and absorption spectra of the donor and acceptor, F(ν) and A(ν):

graphic file with name M2.gif (2)

For the calculation, the absorption spectra A(ν) of the acceptor chlorophylls, Chld and BChla, were measured in acetone solution to avoid problems with the high energy tail of chlorophyll absorption overlapping with the onset of peridinin S2 absorption in PCP. The resulting spectra were then shifted to match the Qy absorption maximum in the reconstituted PCP complexes. The emission spectra of the donor chlorophylls, Chlb and Chla, were taken from the fluorescence measurements on PCP complexes reconstituted with only Chlb or Chla (Fig. S2). Before calculation of the spectral overlap, the fluorescence and absorption spectra, F(ν) and A(ν), were converted to the energy scale and normalized to unit area (40). Resulting values of Θ are listed in Table 1.

The interaction term, V, is calculated as

graphic file with name M3.gif (3)

where μA and μD are transition dipole moments of the acceptor and donor, respectively, κ is the orientation factor, and R is the distance (in nanometers) between the centers of the transition dipole moment vectors of the donor and acceptor. C is a correction factor that takes into account effect of the medium, and for PCP has a value of 0.6 (41). The transition dipole moments were obtained from absorption spectra according to the equation (42)

graphic file with name M4.gif (4)

where ɛmax represents the extinction coefficient at the maximum of the Qy band in M−1.cm−1 units, Γ is the FWHM of the Qy band in cm−1, and νmax is the energy of the Qy maximum in cm−1. The published values of ɛ at Qy maxima in dichloromethane were used for calculation, and Γ and νmax were obtained from fitting the Qy absorption bands in the reconstituted PCP complexes. All parameters used for calculation together with the resulting transition dipole moments are listed in Table 1.

The only remaining factors to calculate the Förster energy transfer rate are the orientation factor κ and the distance between the donor and acceptor chlorophylls, R. Assuming that the transition dipole moment of the Qy band is oriented parallel with the y axis of the molecular frame of the chlorophyll molecule, these values can be readily obtained from the known PCP structure. However, as shown by van Zandvoort et al., the direction of the transition dipole moment of Qy band may slightly deviate from the y axis (43). On the basis of the fluorescence anisotropy measurements on native PCP complex, Kleima et al. determined the range of possible angles between the Qy transition dipole moment and y axis for Chla molecules in PCP (2–7°), and calculated the corresponding range of κ/R3 values to be 0.092–0.114 nm−3 (25). The mean value obtained from this range was used to calculate the Förster energy transfer rate in the reconstituted PCP complexes studied here.

The calculation of the Förster energy transfer rate from the values described above (also summarized in Table 1) yields the rates of 0.0275 ps−1 for the PCP complex reconstituted with the Chlb/Chld mixture, and of 0.02 ps−1 for the Chla/BChla PCP complex. These values correspond to the energy transfer times of 36 ps (Chlb/Chld) and 50 ps (Chla/BChla), matching well the values obtained from experiment, 40 and 59 ps, respectively, confirming that energy transfer between chlorophylls in the PCP monomer occurs via the Förster mechanism. The key factor playing a role upon chlorophyll exchange is the spectral overlap between the donor and acceptor. In the case of two Chla molecules occurring in the native PCP complex, the ideal value of the spectral overlap gives the Chl-Chl energy transfer time of ∼6 ps (25,26). When the energy gap between the donor emission and acceptor absorption increases to >100 nm, as in the case of the Chla/BChla PCP complex, the energy transfer slows down by an order of magnitude. Yet, given the 4 ns Chla lifetime in the PCP complex (37,38), the Chla-BChla energy transfer in the reconstituted PCP complex is essentially 100% efficient. We have also calculated the spectral overlap for reverse (uphill) energy transfer. For the Chlb/Chld pair, the spectral overlap between Chld emission and Chlb absorption is about an order of magnitude lower than that for the downhill energy transfer, suggesting that contribution from back (Chld to Chlb) energy transfer is <10%. In the case of the Chla/BChla pair, the back transfer is essentially impossible as the spectral overlap is <10−6, resulting in values of energy transfer time longer than 1.5 ns.

It is interesting to compare the energy transfer rate obtained for the PCP complex reconstituted with the Chla/BChla mixture with that of the LH2 complex from Rhodopseudomonas acidophila, in which the B800 BChla was replaced by Chla (30). In both systems, the distance between donor (Chla) and acceptor (BChla) is nearly identical: 17.4 Å in PCP (9) and 17.7 Å in LH2 (4). Although the orientation factor κ is smaller for LH2, it is compensated by a larger value of the transition dipole moment of BChla in LH2, leading to very similar calculated energy transfer times of 50 ps in PCP and 45 ps in LH2 (30). Although the experimentally obtained value matches the calculated one for the PCP complex, the experiments carried out with the reconstituted LH2 complex gave Chla-BChla energy transfer time of 8.3 ps, about five times faster than expected from calculation (30). This discrepancy stems from the fact that whereas in PCP we deal with energy transfer between two monomeric chlorophylls, in LH2 the energy acceptor is formed by the excitonically coupled BChla molecules (4). Thus, whereas the donor-acceptor pair in PCP fulfills all the conditions necessary for successful application of the standard Förster theory, to reproduce the energy transfer rate in LH2, it is necessary to apply a modified, multichromophoric Förster theory that accounts for the excitonic character of the acceptor (44,45).

Carotenoid-Chl energy transfer

The time constants of peridinin-Chl transfer for the Chla/BChla PCP complex yields 0.5 ps for the peridinin-BChla and 2.9 ps for the peridinin-Chla energy transfer. Since these values match well those obtained from earlier experiments with PCP complexes reconstituted with a single chlorophyll (19), it is obvious that presence of two different chlorophyll species in the PCP monomer does not affect peridinin-Chl transfer. Yet, the sequential fitting model used to obtain these time constants is, due to three different types of complexes presented in the bulk sample, only an approximation, and the individual EADS shown in Fig. 7 does not represent pure excited state species. Therefore, we have applied a target analysis that fits the data to a model shown in Fig. 8. In this model, we denote the absorbing state of peridinin S2 if it occurs in the domain containing Chla, and S2′ if it contains BChla. Accordingly, the S1/ICT and S1/ICT′ denotes the lowest excited states of peridinin associated with Chla and BChla, respectively. We assume that there is no S2-S2′ or S1/ICT-S1/ICT′ energy transfer and that the transient absorption spectra of the S1/ICT and S1/ICT′ are identical. This assumption is justified because no change in the shape of the S1/ICT transient spectrum was found upon the change of chlorophyll species in the PCP complexes reconstituted with a single chlorophyll species (19). The Chla-BChla energy transfer component was fixed to 59 ps, the value obtained from direct excitation of Chla. The resulting SADS corresponding to the S1/ICT, Chla, and BChla excited state species are shown in Fig. 8. The time constants for the S1/ICT and S1/ICT′ lifetimes are now 2.25 ps and 0.4 ps. Assuming the intrinsic S1/ICT lifetime of 16 ps (11), these values give energy transfer times of 2.6 ps and 0.41 ps, corresponding to the efficiencies of the S1/ICT pathway of 86 and 98% for the peridinin-Chla and peridinin-BChla energy transfer.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Model (top) and results (bottom) of the target analysis applied to data measured after excitation of peridinin into the S2 state at 510 nm for the PCP complex reconstituted with Chla/BChla mixture. The S2′ and S1/ICT′ states refer to peridinin molecules associated with BChla, the S2, and S1/ICT to those associated with Chla. The major energy transfer channels are depicted by solid arrows, and each channel is labeled by a time constant in picoseconds. The ultrafast channels that could not be resolved in the target analysis due to limited time resolution are depicted by dotted arrows. The <0.15 ps time constant refers to depopulation of the peridinin S2 state. The fluorescence from the final state (Bchla Qy state) is shown as a dashed arrow. The bottom panel shows the resulting SADS.

SUMMARY

Time-resolved measurements of PCP reconstituted with a mixture of two different Chl species proved that this reconstitution produced PCP complexes with mixed chlorophyll sites and allowed direct monitoring of energy transfer between the two Chl species. Analysis of absorption and transient absorption spectra revealed another interesting property of the Chl binding site in PCP. Comparison of our time-resolved measurements with steady-state absorption data (39) clearly suggests that the binding site has lowest affinity for Chla, the pigment occurring in the native PCP complex. Energy transfer rates modeled by the Förster equation match those obtained from experiment, confirming the Förster mechanism suggested earlier for native PCP (25). This result demonstrates robustness of the light-harvesting strategy of PCP. Refolding the protein with different pigments and introducing asymmetry in Chl binding sites does not affect the structural features of the complex and maintains the highly efficient energy transfer pathways of the native complex. For peridinin-Chl transfer, the efficiency of the reconstituted PCP can be even higher than in the native complex; in the Chla/BChla system, BChla is a “faster” acceptor than native Chla. Reconstituted PCP complexes are an ideal tool for studies of energy transfer pathways such as the yet-unclear peridinin-Chl S2-Qx pathway (1012,19). Similarly, the BChla reconstitution provides a perfect platform for experimental search of the so-called blue peridinin in PCP (17), because the Soret band of BChla does not overlap with the peridinin absorption. Reconstituted PCP complexes may also serve as model systems for designing artificial antenna. Recently peridinin and related carotenoids have been used in artificial systems, in which their specific excited state properties allowed for tuning energy transfer efficiency by varying solvent polarity (22).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

To view all of the supplemental files associated with this article, visit www.biophysj.org.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Harry A. Frank for useful and stimulating discussions, Frank Sharples for maintaining the algal cultures, and Min Chen for Acaryochloris cells.

T.Po. thanks the Swedish Energy Agency for supporting his stay in Sweden, and the Czech Ministry of Education (grants No. MSM6007665808 and AV0Z50510513) and the Grant Agency of the Czech Academy of Sciences (IAA608170604) for supporting his research in the Czech Republic. The work at Lund University was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and the Wallenberg Foundation.

Editor: Klaus Schulten.

References

  • 1.Green, R. B., and W. W. Parson, editors. 2003. Light-Harvesting Antennas in Photosynthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  • 2.MacColl, R., and D. Guard-Friar. 1987. Phycobiliproteins. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  • 3.Polívka, T., and V. Sundström. 2004. Ultrafast dynamics of carotenoid excited states—from solution to natural and artificial systems. Chem. Rev. 104:2021–2071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sundström, V., T. Pullerits, and R. van Grondelle. 1997. Photosynthetic light-harvesting: reconciling dynamics and structure of purple bacterial LH2 reveals function of photosynthetic unit. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:2327–2346. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ritz, T., A. Damjanovic, K. Schulten, J. P. Zhang, and Y. Koyama. 2000. Efficient light harvesting through carotenoids. Photosynth. Res. 66:125–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Amerongen, H., and R. van Grondelle. 2001. Understanding the energy transfer function of LHCII, the major light-harvesting complex of green plants. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:604–617. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bautista, J. A., R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, D. Gosztola, M. R. Wasielewski, and H. A. Frank. 1999. Singlet and triplet energy transfer in the peridinin-chlorophyll a protein from Amphidinium carterae. J. Phys. Chem. A. 103:2267–2273. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Polívka, T., R. G. Hiller, and H. A. Frank. 2007. Spectroscopy of the peridinin-chlorophyll-a protein: insight into light-harvesting strategy of marine algae. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 458:111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hofmann, E., P. M. Wrench, F. P. Sharples, R. G. Hiller, W. Welte, and K. Diederichs. 1996. Structural basis of light harvesting by carotenoids: peridinin-chlorophyll-protein from Amphidinium carterae. Science. 272:1788–1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Krueger, B. P., S. S. Lampoura, I. H. M. van Stokkum, E. Papagiannakis, J. M. Salverda, C. C. Gradinaru, D. Rutkauskas, R. G. Hiller, and R. van Grondelle. 2001. Energy transfer in the peridinin chlorophyll—a protein of Amphidinium carterae studied by polarized transient absorption and target analysis. Biophys. J. 80:2843–2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zigmantas, D., R. G. Hiller, V. Sundstrom, and T. Polívka. 2002. Carotenoid to chlorophyll energy transfer in the peridinin-chlorophyll-a-protein complex involves an intramolecular charge transfer state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:16760–16765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Linden, P. A., J. Zimmermann, T. Brixner, N. E. Holt, H. M. Vaswani, R. G. Hiller, and G. R. Fleming. 2004. Transient absorption study of peridinin and peridinin-chlorophyll-a-protein after two photon excitation. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108:10340–10345. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bautista, J. A., R. E. Connors, B. B. Raju, R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, D. Gosztola, M. R. Wasielewski, and H. A. Frank. 1999. Excited state properties of peridinin: observation of a solvent dependence of the lowest excited singlet state lifetime and spectral behavior unique among carotenoids. J. Phys. Chem. B. 103:8751–8758. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frank, H. A., J. A. Bautista, J. Josue, Z. Pendon, R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, D. Gosztola, and M. R. Wasielewski. 2000. Effect of the solvent environment on the spectroscopic properties and dynamics of the lowest excited states of carotenoids. J. Phys. Chem. B. 104:4569–4577. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zigmantas, D. R. G., F. P. Hiller, H. A. Sharples, V. Frank, V. Sundström, and T. Polívka. 2004. Effect of a conjugated carbonyl group on the photophysical properties of carotenoids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6:3009–3016. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vaswani, H. M., C. P. Hsu, M. Head-Gordon, and G. R. Fleming. 2003. Quantum chemical evidence for an intramolecular charge-transfer state in the carotenoid peridinin of peridinin-chlorophyll-protein. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107:7940–7946. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shima, S., R. P. Ilagan, N. Gillespie, B. J. Sommer, R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, H. A. Frank, and R. R. Birge. 2003. Two-photon and fluorescence spectroscopy and the effect of environment on the photochemical properties of peridinin in solution and in the peridinin-chlorophyll-protein from Amphidinium carterae. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107:8052–8066. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Papagiannakis, E., D. S. Larsen, I. H. M. van Stokkum, M. Vengris, R. G. Hiller, and R. van Grondelle. 2004. Resolving the excited state equilibrium of peridinin in solution. Biochemistry. 43:15303–15309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Polívka, T., T. Pascher, V. Sundström, and R. G. Hiller. 2005. Tuning energy transfer in the peridinin-chlorophyll complex by reconstitution with different chlorophylls. Photosynth. Res. 86:217–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Polívka, T., I. H. M. van Stokkum, D. Zigmantas, R. van Grondelle, V. Sundström, and R. G. Hiller. 2006. Energy transfer in the major intrinsic light-harvesting complex from Amphidinium carterae. Biochemistry. 45:8516–8526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Papagiannakis, E., I. H. M. van Stokkum, H. Fey, C. Büchel, and R. van Grondelle. 2005. Spectroscopic characterization of the excitation energy transfer in the fucoxanthin-chlorophyll protein of diatoms. Photosynth. Res. 86:241–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Polívka, T., M. Pellnor, E. Melo, T. Pascher, V. Sundström, A. Osuka, and K. R. Naqvi. 2007. Polarity-tuned energy transfer efficiency in artificial light-harvesting antennae containing carbonyl carotenoids peridinin and fucoxanthin. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111:467–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krikunova, M., H. Lokstein, D. Leupold, R. G. Hiller, and B. Voigt. 2006. Pigment-pigment interactions in PCP of Amphidinium carterae investigated by nonlinear polarization spectroscopy in the frequency domain. Biophys. J. 90:261–271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wörmke, S., S. Mackowski, T. H. P. Brotosudarmo, C. Jung, A. Zumbusch, M. Ehrl, H. Scheer, E. Hofmann, R. G. Hiller, and C. Bräuchle. 2007. Monitoring fluorescence of individual chromophores in peridinin-chlorophyll-protein complex using single molecule spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1767:956–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kleima, F. J., E. Hofmann, B. Gobets, I. H. M. van Stokkum, R. van Grondelle, K. Diederichs, and H. van Amerongen. 2000. Förster excitation energy transfer in peridinin-chlorophyll-a-protein. Biophys. J. 78:344–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ilagan, R. P., S. Shima, A. Melkozernov, S. Lin, R. E. Blankenship, F. P. Sharples, R. G. Hiller, R. R. Birge, and H. A. Frank. 2004. Spectroscopic properties of the main-form and high-salt peridinin-chlorophyll a proteins from Amphidinium carterae. Biochemistry. 43:1478–1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ilagan, R. P., J. F. Koscielecki, R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, G. N. Gibson, R. R. Birge, and H. A. Frank. 2006. Femtosecond time-resolved absorption spectroscopy of main-form and high-salt peridinin-chlorophyll-a proteins at low temperatures. Biochemistry. 45:14052–14063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reference deleted in proof.
  • 29.Bandilla, M., B. Ucker, M. Ram, I. Simonin, E. Gelhaye, G. McDermott, R. J. Cogdell, and H. Scheer. 1998. Reconstitution of the B800 bacteriochlorophylls in the peripheral light harvesting complex B800–850 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1. with BChl a and modified (bacterio)chlorophylls. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1364:390–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Herek, J. L., N. J. Fraser, T. Pullerits, P. Martinsson, T. Polívka, H. Scheer, R. J. Cogdell, and V. Sundström. 2000. Mechanism of B800–B850 energy transfer in native and modified LH2 complexes of Rps. acidophila 10050. Biophys. J. 78:2590–2596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Paulsen, H. 2006. Reconstitution and pigment exchange. In Chlorophylls and Bacteriochlorophylls: Biochemistry, Biophysics, Functions and Applications. B. Grimm, R. J. Porra, W. Rüdiger, and H. Scheer, editors. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 375–385.
  • 32.Miller, D. J., J. Catmull, R. Puskeiler, H. Tweedale, F. P. Sharples, and R. G. Hiller. 2005. Reconstitution of the peridinin chlorophyll a protein (PCP): evidence for functional flexibility in chlorophyll binding. Photosynth. Res. 86:229–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ilagan, R. P., T. W. Chapp, R. G. Hiller, F. P. Sharples, T. Polívka, and H. A. Frank. 2006. Optical spectroscopic studies of light-harvesting by pigment-reconstituted peridinin-chlorophyll-proteins at cryogenic temperatures. Photosynth. Res. 90:5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brotosudarmo, T. H. P., E. Hofmann, R. G. Hiller, S. Wörmke, S. Mackowski, A. Zumbusch, C. Bräuchle, and H. Scheer. 2006. Peridinin-chlorophyll-protein reconstituted with chlorophyll mixtures: preparation, bulk and single molecule spectroscopy. FEBS Lett. 580:5257–5262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mackowski, S., S. Wörmke, T. H. P. Brotosudarmo, C. Jung, R. G. Hiller, H. Scheer, and C. Bräuchle. 2007. Energy transfer in reconstituted peridinin-chlorophyll protein complexes: ensemble and single molecule spectroscopy studies. Biophys. J. 93:3249–3258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van Stokkum, I. H. M., D. S. Larsen, and R. van Grondelle. 2004. Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1657:82–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koka, P., and P. S. Song. 1977. Chromophore topography and binding environment of peridinin-chlorophyll-a protein complexes from marine dinoflagellate algae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 495:220–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mackowski, S., S. Wörmke, T. H. P. Brotosudarmo, H. Scheer, and C. Bräuchle. 2008. Fluorescence spectroscopy of reconstituted peridinin-chlorophyll protein complexes. Photosynth. Res. 95:253–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brotosudarmo, T. H. P., S. Mackowski, E. Hofmann, R. G. Hiller, C. Bräuchle, and H. Scheer. 2008. Relative binding affinities of chlorophylls in peridinin-chlorophyll-protein reconstituted with heterochlorophyllous mixtures. Photosynth. Res. 95:247–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pullerits, T., S. Hess, J. L. Herek, and V. Sundström. 1997. Temperature dependence of excitation transfer in LH2 of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101:10560–10567. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kleima, F. J., M. Wendling, E. Hofman, E. J. G. Peterman, R. van Grondelle, and H. van Amerongen. 2000. Peridinin chlorophyll a protein: relating structure and steady-state spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 39:5184–5195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gilbert, A., and J. Baggott. 1991. Essentials of Molecular Photochemistry. Blackwell Science. Oxford.
  • 43.van Zandvoort, M. A. M. J., D. Wrobel, P. Lettinga, G. van Ginkel, and Y. K. Levine. 1995. The orientation of the transition dipole moments of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in their molecular frame. Photochem. Photobiol. 62:299–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jang, S., M. D. Newton, and R. J. Silbey. 2007. Multichromophoric Förster resonance energy transfer from B800 to B850 in the light harvesting complex 2: evidence for subtle energetic optimization by purple bacteria. J. Phys. Chem. B. 111:6807–6814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kimura, A., and T. Kakitani. 2003. Theory of excitation energy transfer in the intermediate coupling case of clusters. J. Phys. Chem. B. 107:14486–14499. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kobayashi, M., M. Akiyama, H. Kano, and H. Kise. 2006. Spectroscopy and structure determination. In Chlorophylls and Bacteriochlorophylls: Biochemistry, Biophysics, Functions and Applications. B. Grimm, R. J. Porra, W. Rüdiger, and H. Scheer, editors. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 79–94.

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES