Variations in ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) late heart mediastinal ratios in chronic heart failure: a need for standardisation and validation

Abstract

Background

There is lack of validation and standardisation of acquisition parameters for myocardial ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). This lack of standardisation hampers large scale implementation of ¹²³I-MIBG parameters in the evaluation of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods

In a retrospective multi-centre study ¹²³I-MIBG planar scintigrams obtained on 290 CHF patients (82% male; 58% dilated cardiomyopathy; New York Heart Association [NYHA classification] > I) were reanalysed to determine the late heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M).

Results

There was a large variation in acquisition parameters. Multivariate forward stepwise regression showed that a significant proportion (31%, p < 0.001) of the variation in late H/M could be explained by a model containing patient-related variables and acquisition parameters. Left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), type of collimation (p < 0.001), acquisition duration (p = 0.001), NYHA class (p = 0.028) and age (p = 0.034) were independent predictors of late H/M.

Conclusions

Acquisitions parameters are independent contributors to the variation of semi-quantitative measurements of cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG uptake. Improved standardisation of cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG imaging parameters would contribute to increased clinical applicability for this procedure.

Introduction

Radiolabelled metaiodobenzylguanidine (¹²³I-MIBG), an analog of the false neurotransmitter guanethidine, localises in adrenergic nerve terminals primarily via the norepinephrine (NE) transporter (uptake-1) system [1, 2]. In the past two decades, a large number of investigators have demonstrated decreased myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG uptake in heart failure patients and have shown that those with the lowest uptake tend to have the poorest prognosis [3–11]. There have also been findings suggesting that abnormalities of myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG uptake may be predictive of increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death (SCD) [12, 13].

One factor that has constrained acceptance of cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG imaging as a clinical patient management tool in heart failure has been the variability of technical aspects of the procedure. Although most publications have included the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) as the measure of myocardial uptake, the methods used to obtain this parameter show considerable variation. In addition, the influence of procedural and acquisition parameters on the reproducibility of this measurement technique have only occasionally been considered. While the effect of collimator selection on H/M ratios has been studied, similar attention has not been paid to the impact of administered activity, acquisition time and duration [14]. Given the absence of published guidelines for cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG imaging, standardisation of procedures among individual users of this agent becomes even more important.

The objective of the present study was to examine the influence of procedural variables associated with ¹²³I-MIBG imaging when a standardised technique was used to determine the H/M ratio.

Materials and methods

Study design

Myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG scintigrams on 290 heart failure patients (male and female subjects ≥18 years of age with New York Heart Association [NYHA] Classes II–IV) from six sites in five European countries were retrieved and analysed. These imaging studies were performed between 1993 and 2002 and were collected for a previously described trial [15]. This trial was designed to show that standardised methodology could be applied to the analysis and processing of ¹²³I-MIBG myocardial images to obtain reproducible quantitative results. As the large majority of patients had only late planar ¹²³I-MIBG images, the analysis of these images is the sole focus of this paper.

Investigational sites sent copies of all digital image files to an Imaging Core Laboratory (ICL) for evaluation and analysis. Data on amount of ¹²³I-MIBG activity injected and image acquisition parameters (i.e. delay after injection of ¹²³I-MIBG and start of acquisition, acquisition duration and type of collimator used) were collected.

The primary efficacy objective of the original trial was to determine the prognostic significance of the late H/M ratio in relation to occurrence of major cardiac events (MCE), defined as either: 1) cardiac death due to all causes, including myocardial infarction (MI), progressive heart failure and sudden cardiac death (SCD); 2) cardiac transplant; 3) potentially fatal arrhythmic event, including resuscitated cardiac arrest or appropriate internal cardiac defibrillator (ICD) discharge. Results of that analysis have been published. For the purposes of this paper, H/M thresholds associated with low-, intermediate- and high-risk for MCEs were defined to provide the basis for the multivariate analysis described below.

Image analysis

An experienced nuclear medicine technologist not affiliated with the ICL processed all the planar images to determine the heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio. The heart region of interest (ROI) was drawn manually to include both ventricles and any atrial activity that was clearly visible. A square mediastinal ROI was drawn in the upper mediastium, using the apices of the lungs as anatomic landmarks (Fig. 1). The H/M ratio was calculated as the ratio of the counts/pixel in the two ROIs.

Fig. 1.

Example of processing procedure for late planar ¹²³I-MIBG images. The positioning of the mediastinal ROI was standardized in relation to the lung apex, the lower boundary of the upper mediastinum and the midline between the lungs

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, unless indicated otherwise. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were used to analyse differences in event rate for different subject groups defined by the late H/M thresholds. Differences between these groups for continuous data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Bonferroni. Categorical data were compared using the Fisher’s exact test. A forward stepwise multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of late H/M. Explanatory variables were related to patient characteristics (i.e. gender, age, NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], and underlying etiology of heart failure) and to acquisition parameters (i.e. amount of injected ¹²³I-MIBG activity, collimator type, delay after injection and start of acquisition, and duration of acquisition). Multivariate forward stepwise regression analysis was performed for all study subjects. The overall goodness-of-fit for each model was expressed as the adjusted R². The F test was used to assess whether a model explained a significant proportion of the variability. A p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (SPSS for Windows, version 11.01, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

As previously described, there were 67 major cardiac events. Figure 2 shows a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for three different groups of late H/M. Quantitative estimates for low risk (late H/M >2.0, 2-year survival of 95%), intermediate risk (late H/M 1.4–2.0, 2-year survival of 76%) and high risk (late H/M <1.4, 2-year survival of 45%) could be determined. The differences in event rate were statistically significant between the three groups (all p < 0.001).

Fig. 2.

Kaplan–Meier curve showing the relation between survival and time to first major cardiac event for three groups with different H/M values: late H/M <1.4 vs late H/M 1.4–2.0, p < 0.0001; late H/M<1.4 vs late H/M >2.0, p < 0.0001; late H/M 1.4–2.0 vs late H/M>2.0, p < 0.0001

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics and the parameters related to the ¹²³I-MIBG acquisition of all subjects and for the three different groups of late H/M. Overall, the majority of subjects were male and were in functional class II according the NYHA classification and had a LVEF<50% (n = 262). Between the three late H/M groups, there were differences in age (subjects with a late H/M >2.0 were younger), NYHA classification, LVEF (increasing from subjects with a late H/M <1.4 to subjects with a late H/M >2.0) and HF etiology. In addition, there were no differences in parameters of heart failure (LVEF and NYHA classification) between the different centres.

Table 1.

Patient and scintigraphic parameters for all subjects and subdivided by late H/M ¹²³I-MIBG

	All (N = 290)	Late H/M
		<1.4 (N = 51)	1.4–2.0 (N = 143)	>2.0 (N = 96)
Patient characteristics
Male/Female	237/53	39/12*	117/26*	81/15*
Age (years)	53 ± 11 (21–83)	55 ± 10‡	54 ± 10‡	49 ± 11
NYHA (II/III/IV)	165/116/9	11/34/6†	85/55/3†	69/27/0†
LVEF (%)	32 ± 14 (7–85)	23 ± 9†	31 ± 13‡	39 ± 14*
Etiology of heart failure (isch/non-isch)	121/169	20/31‡	70/73‡	31/65‡
Scintigraphic parameters
Collimator type (LEGP/LEHR/ME)	50/216/24†	24/25/2†	24/104/15†	2/87/7†
Activity (MBq)	164 ± 53 (72–370)	145 ± 31†	173 ± 64	160 ± 41
Delay after injection (h)	4.3 ± 0.6 (1.9–6.9)	4.1 ± 0.5‡	4.3 ± 0.5‡	4.5 ± 0.6
Duration of acquisition (min)	9.6 ± 3.3 (1–15)	11.3 ± 4.3†	9.2 ± 3.4	9.4 ± 2.0*

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range).

NYHA New York Heart Association, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, Isch ischemic, Non-isch non-ischemic, LEGP low-energy all purpose, LEHR low-energy high resolution, ME medium energy, MBq mega-Becquerel, h hours, min minutes.

Categorical data (Fisher’s exact test, for each group): *p = 0.53; †p < 0.001; ‡p < 0.035.

Continuous data (ANOVA with posthoc Bonferoni): *p < 0.01 compared to late H/M <1.4; †p < 0.01 compared to late H/M 1.4–2.0; ‡p < 0.01 compared to late H/M >2.0.

Overall, most acquisitions were performed with low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) collimators (74%), followed by low-energy general purpose (LEGP) collimators (17%). Only 9% of acquisitions were made with medium-energy (ME) collimators, all from one centre. The amount of activity injected ranged from 72 to 370 MBq (mean 164 ± 53 MBq). There was a large variation in the time-span after between injection of ¹²³I-MIBG and imaging, ranging from 1.9 up to 6.9 h (mean delay 4.3 ± 0.6 h). The duration of acquisition could be classified in seven categories: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 and 15 min. The majority of acquisitions was performed with a 10-min duration (n = 203). There were differences between the three late H/M groups in collimator type, amount of injected ¹²³I-MIBG, delay after injection, and duration of acquisition (Table 1).

Table 2 shows the results of the stepwise multivariate regression analysis for all subjects and all parameters. LVEF, collimator type, duration of acquisition, NYHA classification and age were independent predictors of late H/M. This model predicted approximately 30% of the variation in late H/M results (p < 0.0001). Even after exclusion of the very low acquisition durations (<5 min), the duration of acquisition remained an independent predictor of late H/M.

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of clinical and acquisition related parameters as predictors of late H/M for all subjects (N = 290)

Variables	Coefficient b	Standard error b	P value
Constant	0.549	0.411
LVEF	0.015	0.02	<0.001
Collimator type	0.531	0.087	<0.001
Duration of acquisition	0.045	0.014	0.001
NYHA	−0.121	0.055	0.028
Age	−0.006	0.003	0.034

Goodness-of-fit of the model: adjusted R² = 0.312; P value = <0.0001

In subjects with a late H/M <1.4, stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that NYHA classification and delay after injection were the only independent predictors of late H/M (Table 3). This model predicted approximately 10% of late H/M (p = 0.03). In subjects with a late H/M 1.4–2.0, stepwise multivariate regression analysis showed that LVEF and collimator type were the only independent predictors of late H/M (Table 4). This model predicted approximately 10% of late H/M (p = 0.001). In subjects with a late H/M >2.0, duration of acquisition was the only independent predictor of late H/M (Table 5). However, duration of acquisition predicted only 1% of late H/M and explained a statistically non-significant proportion of variability (p = 0.347).

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of clinical and acquisition related parameters as predictors of late H/M for subjects with a late H/M<1.4 (N = 51)

Variables	Coefficient b	Standard error b	P value
Constant	1.680	0.161
NYHA	−0.055	0.027	0.049
Delay after injection	−0.068	0.030	0.031

Goodness-of-fit of the model: adjusted R² = 0.104; P value = 0.030

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of clinical and acquisition related parameters as predictors of late H/M for subjects with a late H/M 1.4–2.0 (N = 143)

Variables	Coefficient b	Standard error b	P value
Constant	1.370	0.078
LVEF	0.004	0.001	0.001
Collimator type	0.086	0.030	0.005

Goodness-of-fit of the model: adjusted R² = 0.100; P value = 0.001

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of clinical and acquisition related parameters as predictors of late H/M for subjects with a late H/M >2.0 (N = 96)

Variables	Coefficient b	Standard error b	P value
Constant	0.022	1.376
Duration of acquisition	0.119	0.057	0.040

Goodness-of-fit of the model: adjusted R² = 0.013; P value = 0.347

Discussion

In a heterogeneous population of heart failure patients, the most important determinant of cardiac uptake of ¹²³I-MIBG is the degree of impairment of the NE transporter function in presynaptic adrenergic neurons [3–11]. As such, considerable variation in late H/M would be expected between patients with otherwise similar clinical presentations (NYHA class, LVEF, etc). Nevertheless, the findings of the present study indicate that a proportion of the variation in the late H/M ¹²³I-MIBG can also be explained by differences in acquisition parameters. Of particular interest, the factors contributing to this variation differed for different ranges of late H/M.

Abnormalities in myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG imaging have been demonstrated in patients with both common cardiac pathologies such as CAD, CHF, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy [3–12, 16–18] and more uncommon entities such as Syndrome X [19], Brugada Syndrome [20] and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation [13]. However, there has been limited standardisation of the acquisition and quantitative analysis techniques used by various investigators, and most studies have involved small numbers of subjects and locally defined reference standards and measures of outcome. Thus, despite the large number of studies on cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG imaging, these methodological and analytical limitations have hampered the implementation of this technique for the evaluation and management of individual patients.

Acquisition duration was one of the independent predictors of late H/M. The positive correlation suggests that a longer acquisition time is associated with a higher late H/M. However, it is more likely that this association reflects that a longer acquisition time results in a higher number of counts and the allied improvement of count statistics. In particular, in patients with reduced myocardial uptake (i.e. heart failure patients), the higher signal-to-noise ratio for a longer acquisition (≥10 min in the present study) plays a pivotal role in the accurate assessment of late H/M. In addition, delay after injection was in high-risk subjects (late H/M <1.4), an independent predictor of late H/M. The negative correlation suggests that a longer acquisition time is associated with a lower late H/M.

However, in analogy to acquisition duration, it is more likely that this association reflects that a longer delay results in a lower number of counts and the allied deterioration of count statistics. In particular, in patients with reduced myocardial uptake (i.e. heart failure patients), the higher signal-to-noise ratio for a shorter delay after injection plays a pivotal role in the accurate assessment of late H/M.

The most well-validated influence on the measured late H/M is the collimator type. Because of the high-energy photons emitted by ¹²³I, septal penetration affects estimation of the H/M ratio in ¹²³I-MIBG imaging with a low-energy (LE) collimator [21]. Medium-energy (ME) collimators have been shown to improve quantitative accuracy in ¹²³I studies [14, 21, 22]. While these results would suggest that semi-quantitative cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG imaging might best be performed using ME collimators, there are practical limitations to such a recommendation. Almost all nuclear cardiology procedures are now performed on a multi-head gamma camera, and many dedicated dual-head cardiac cameras are not supplied with ME collimators (at least for SPECT).

The precise impact of collimator choice on the prognostic value has not been evaluated yet. However, it seems feasible that the improved accuracy of the ME collimators will decrease the number of patients with an intermediate risk likelihood and thereby improving the prognostic accuracy of myocardial uptake parameters of ¹²³I-MIBG. It is therefore important to establish the degree to which the collimator used affects prognostic utility of the H/M measurement.

Rigorous and uniform analysis of cardiac ¹²³I-MIBG parameters minimises inter-and intra-individual variation [15, 23]. In the analysis of the entire population, numerous variables (LVEF, collimator type, duration of acquisition, NYHA classification and age) contributed to the prediction of H/M, but only two of these variables are under the control of the imager. Furthermore, the present results suggest that the severity of cardiac sympathetic neuronal dysfunction also modulates the impact of acquisition parameters on the H/M determinations. For example, in the low-risk group (H/M >2.0), none of the parameters had a meaningful impact on the numerical result, indicating that preserved myocardial uptake of ¹²³I-MIBG can be reliably determined under widely different acquisition conditions. By comparison, considering user-controlled variables, assessment of high-risk subjects (H/M <1.4) was affected by delay after injection, while the assessment of H/M in the intermediate risk subjects was affected by the collimator employed. Standardisation therefore is most important in assessing patients with more severe disease, although in the present study the procedural variables only contributed a relatively small fraction of the overall variability in H/M determinations.

Aging is associated with changes in the cardiovascular autonomic regulation, both under resting and stimulated conditions. At rest, elderly subjects show increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity as well as impaired arterial baroreflex function [24–34]. The negative correlation, although weak, between age and late H/M is in line with the finding that sympathetic activity increases with age typically reflected by increased circulating catecholamine levels, and that it is associated with decreased myocardial uptake of ¹²³I-MIBG, an observation previously reported by Somsen et al. [35] and Estorch et al [36].

¹²³I-MIBG has been shown by individual centres to have both good reproducibility and acceptable variability, and to have prognostic value in CHF patients [3–11, 23, 37, 38]. These single-centre experiences, however, do not necessarily allow for extrapolation of the obtained results to other centres. In spite of this, quantitative thresholds are often implemented without inter-institutional validation. Because there are differences between centres in hardware, acquisition parameters and post-acquisition processing, the extrapolation to other centres, or generalisation of these single-centre findings, is not per se justified. Especially due to the lack of well-defined data sets, validation in each separate centre and between centres has not been possible.

Recently, a realistic 3D-gated cardiac phantom, the Amsterdam gated cardiac phantom (AGATE phantom), was developed and validated [39]. Such a phantom could be used as a tool for the validation in each separate centre and for standardisation between centres. However, a phantom can only partially simulate patient characteristics. Therefore, the phantom results obtained will give only an impression of repeatability and variability, but they do not necessarily reflect the accuracy of measurements in patients. Therefore, in addition to the phantom measurements, a set of reference patient studies should also be included in a validation of the technique [40]. Moreover, the results should be validated in each separate centre and monitored for reproducibility and consistency.

Several medications used to treat patients with heart failure may influence myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG uptake. However, in our study the data on medication use were relatively complete, available for about 80% of the study subjects, so any further analysis could only be based on this subset. The problem with pursuing a medication analysis is that any effect on ¹²³I-MIBG uptake is related to individual physiology and efficacy of treatment rather than on the technical attributes of the imaging, which was the main focus of this manuscript. In addition, the main manuscript already included results examining these effects, specifically that subjects that had events were less likely to be on β-blockers than those who did not have events [15]. A specific analysis of the effect of medication was not deemed appropriate to this manuscript. In addition, the use of medication that interferes with myocardial uptake of ¹²³I-MIBG (such as tricyclic antidepressants), was not significant and did not warrant a separate analysis.

The primary limitation of the present study has already been noted, namely, that the largest influence on the H/M is cardiac disease status rather than image acquisition parameters. Although collimation and acquisition duration were independent predictors of late H/M, their individual contributions to measurement variance were <10% each. Because of the retrospective nature of this multi-centre study, it was not possible to control for the effects of numerous variables that might have had undetected impact on late H/M. Studies using phantoms have already established the effect of collimator selection on H/M, and similar studies could be performed to examine the influence of count rate and total counts. Additional patient studies that included multiple acquisitions of different durations and times post-injection could establish the effect of these parameters on H/M with greater clarity.

In conclusion, the limited standardisation in acquisition parameters reported in literature was also reflected in the results of this multi-centre study. A wide variety of collimators, delay after injection of ¹²³I-MIBG to the start of the acquisition and acquisition durations were reported. In general, validation and standardisation require commitment and perseverance. Moreover, without proper validation and standardisation, the role myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG in the clinical management of CHF will continue to be constrained. Without these requirements, the use of myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG will be limited to a single centre research tool for understanding the physiology of myocardial sympathetic neuronal activity under different conditions and after interventions. With application of appropriate standardisation, myocardial ¹²³I-MIBG imaging could become a routine procedure for evaluation of heart failure and other cardiac disease populations.