Abstract
To develop a potential SPECT probe to evaluate the integrity of the serotoninergic system (5-HTT) whose dysfunction is linked to several disease conditions such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s diseases and depression, we report the synthesis, radiolabeling and in vivo baboon imaging of 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(3′-[123I]iodophenyl) tropane (YP256, 6). The radiolabeling was performed by iododestannylation using sodium [123I]iodide and peracetic acid. Although the ligand displayed high selectivity for 5-HTT over dopamine transporter (DAT) in vitro, SPECT imaging in baboons did not reveal selective 5-HTT accumulation in brain in vivo.
Keywords: radiolabeling, serotonin transporter, monkey study, brain imaging, SPECT
1. Introduction
Several disease conditions are strongly linked to the degeneration (Parkinson’s disease 1–3 and schizophrenia 4) or the dysfunction (pathogenesis of depression 5) of the serotonergic neurons in the human brain. Cocaine (1) exerts multiple physiological effects on the mammalian central nervous system through its ability to bind to the dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters in brain, resulting in a loss of their respective function. The development of new SPECT or PET radiolabeled analogs of cocaine binding specifically to 5-HTT has been used to provide potential tools to explore the brain serotonergic system in vivo in these diseases. The different structure-activity relationship studies in pursuit of an enhanced selectivity for 5-HTT have yielded several potential candidates, mostly tropane derivatives such as β-CIT (RTI-55, 2) and its N-desmethyl analog norCIT 6, but have shown limited results due to their poor selectivity for 5-HTT over DAT. The search for a high-affinity, selective 5-HTT radiotracer has proved elusive (for reviews, see 7–10). The PET tracer [11C](+)-McN-5652-Z has been used for several years 11, even though its low target to background ratio limits its use to high density regions like the midbrain 12,13. A fluorine-18 labeled analog [18F]FMe-McN5652 has shown somewhat better properties in pigs and rats 14,15. Reports of diphenyl sulfide-related ligands of the “IDAM” type 16 led to tracers with higher in vivo selectivity, and two of these, [11C]DASB 17 and [11C]MADAM 18, have found their way into human studies. Further refinements have also been reported in animals with fluorinated analogs [11C]AFM and [11C]AFA.
Based on the observations of Carroll 19 and Davies 20,21 that selectivity for 5-HTT was enhanced by unsaturated substituents on the phenyl ring and by N-demethylation (trends confirmed by preliminary results with 4′-substituted analogs 22,23), we synthesized a series of 3′-substituted tropane analogs and measured their binding affinity towards the three monoamine transporters. The potency (Ki, nM) of the compounds was evaluated by competition against radiolabeled ligands selective for 5-HTT, DAT, and NET in rat forebrain tissue and human cell membranes and binding selectivity was calculated as the inverse ratio of Ki values. The results pointed out an unexpected ability for the position 3′ to increase the selectivity for 5-HTT over DAT without substantial loss of binding affinity for 5-HTT, especially in the case of the 3′analog of β-CIT 5 (Table 1), which was less potent than the 4′-isomer β-CIT (21-fold in rat and 14-fold in human), but more so at DAT than 5-HTT, so that the selectivity for 5-HTT was greater (Table 2). Similar to previous reports 5, selectivity for 5-HTT was increased even further by N-demethylation: the nor-compound 6 (or YP256) exhibited 16-fold (rat) or 415-fold (human) selectivity towards 5-HTT over DAT. The radiolabeling and in vivo study of the 123I labeled form of this compound are reported here.
Table 1.
Affinity of 3′-substituted phenyltropanes for rat (r) and human (h) dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine transporters (Ki ± SEM, nM). SERT was assayed with [3H]cyanoimipramine (700 pM; blank: fluoxetine, 10 μM) and rat cerebral cortex and hSERT membranes; DAT with [3H]β-CIT (300 pM; blank: GBR-12909, 10 μM) and homogenates of rat caudate nucleus and hDAT membranes; and NET with [3H]nisoxetine (350 pM, blank: desipramine, 10 μM) with rat cerebral cortex and hNET membranes.
Compound | DAT | h DAT | 5-HTT | h 5-HTT | NET | h NET |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5a | 100±11 | 279±41 | 9.82±0.80 | 9.63±0.4 | >10,000 | 1039±53 |
6 | 21.2±4.6 | 510±71 | 1.35±0.13 | 1.23±0.04 | 325±99 | 118±3 |
β-CIT | 0.96±0.15 | 0.48 | 0.46±0.06 | 0.67 | 2.80±0.40 | NM |
tested as the HCl salt.
NM: Not measured.
Table 2.
Binding Selectivity Ratios (Larger numbers are more selective)
Compound | 5 HTT/DAT | h 5-HTT/h DAT | 5-HTT/NET | h 5 HTT/h NET |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10.2 | 29.0 | >1020 | 108 |
6 | 15.7 | 415 | 241 | 95.9 |
β-CIT | 2.08 | 1.40 | 6.08 |
2. Materials and Methods
General
1H NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker AM 500 MHz spectrometer and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker 400 MHz. Mass spectra were obtained with a Micromass Q-Tof spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab Inc. (Knoxville, TN), and values within 0.4% of the theoretical values were accepted as valid. Flash chromatography 24 was performed with 40-μm mesh silica gel 60 (J. T. Baker) using eluents as indicated. Starting materials for syntheses were purchased either from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, MO) or from Acros Corp. (Pittsburgh, PA). No-carrier-added sodium [123I]iodide in dilute NaOH was obtained from Nordion International, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
2.1. Chemistry
2.1.1. 8-Methyl-3β-(3′-trimethylsilylphenyl)-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 4
To a suspension of powdered Mg (2.78 g, 116 mmol) in anhydrous ether (300 mL) was added a solution of 1-bromo-3-trimethylsilylbenzene (18.3 g, 80 mmol) in anhydrous ether (150 mL) under stirring and Ar (g). After 10 min, a few drops of a solution of 1,2-dibromoethane in ether (10 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred slowly for 20 min. The reaction was cooled to −78°C and ecgonidine methyl ester 3 (5 g, 27.6 mmol) in ether (200 mL) was added drop-wise. The temperature was raised to −20°C and after 1 h at this temperature, the reaction was cooled to−70°C, and trifluoroacetic acid (3 mL) in ether (5 mL) was slowly added. The temperature was allowed to increase to − 40°C and H2O (20 mL) was slowly added. Without delay, the mixture was basified with 15 M NH4OH. The mixture was extracted with ether and the organic layer was washed with saturated NaCl, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ether/triethylamine 9:1:0.5) to give 2.97 g (32%) of product as a white powder. 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3) : δ7.41 (s, 1H, H-2′), 7.35 (m, 1H, H-4′), 7.30 (m, 2H, H-6′, H-5′), 3.59 (m,1H, H-1), 3.51 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.41 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.05 (m, 1H), 2.95 (m, 1H), 2.65 (dt, 1H, J1 = 13.0 Hz, J2 = 2.5 Hz, H-4β), 2.27 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 2.23 (m, 1H), 2.15 (m, 1H), 1.72 (m, 3H), 0.01 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (125.7, CDCl3) : δ 173.3, 143.0, 140.6, 133.3, 131.9, 129.1, 128.4, 66.5, 63.4, 54.0, 52.1, 43.0, 35.2, 35.0, 27.0, 26.2, 0.0.
2.1.2. 3β-(3-Iodophenyl)-8-methyl-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 5
To a solution of 4 (2.9 g, 8.7 mmol) in HOAc (100 mL) was added ICl (1.56 g, 1.1 eq.) under stirring and argon. The mixture was heated at 60°C for 24 h and, after cooling, ice-water was added. The mixture was basified with 15 M NH4OH, then extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The crude material was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ether/triethylamine 9:1:0.5) of silica gel, to give 2.35 g of product as a colorless oil (70 %).
1H NMR (399.98 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 7.44 (s, 1H, H-2′), 7.34 (d, 1H, J = 7.99, H-4′), 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 7.99, H-6′), 6.87 (t, 1H, J = 7.99, H-5′), 3.44 (m,1H, H-1), 3.40 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.22 (m, 1H, H-5), 2.79 (m, 2H, H-2, H-3), 2.40 (m, 2H), 2.09 (s, 3H, N-CH3), 1.99 (m, 2H), 1.52 (m, 3H).
13C NMR (100.57 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.2, 146.1, 136.8, 135.2, 130.1, 127.0, 94.6, 65.6, 62.5, 52.9, 51.6, 42.3, 34.2, 33.9, 26.2, 25.6.
2.1.3 3β-(3′-Iodophenyl)-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 6
To a stirred solution of 5 in anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane under N2 (g), was added drop-wise 1-chloroethyl chloroformate (ACE-Cl, 6 eq.), and the mixture was refluxed for 12 h. After cooling, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator and MeOH (50 mL) was added. After being refluxed for 8 h, the solution was evaporated to dryness. Water (150 mL) was added, the mixture was basified with NH4OH and extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed with H2O, saturated NaCl, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness\. The crude material was purified by column chromatography with hexane/ether/Et3N (4/6/0.2), to afford 1.40 g (62%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 7.47 (s, 1H, H-2′), 7.35 (d, 1H, J = 7.99, H-4′), 7.15 (d, 1H, J = 7.99, H-6′), 6.90 (t, 1H, J = 7.99, H-5′), 3.71 (m, 2H, H-1+H-5), 3.39 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.20 (m, 1H, H-3), 2.72 (m, 1H, H-2), 2.40 (m, 1H), 2.05 (m, 2H), 1.68 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100.57 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 172.8, 146.8, 136.5, 135.7, 131.2, 127.5, 94.5, 56.5, 53.9, 51.2, 52.1, 35.9, 33.6, 29.4, 27.8.
2.1.4. 3β-(3′-Iodophenyl)-8-t-butoxycarbonyl-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 7
To a 0°C cooled and stirred solution of nortropane 6 (280 mg, 0.75 mmol) in anhydrous CH3CN under N2 (g) was added, drop-wise, 4-dimethylaminopyridine (138 mg, 1.5 eq.) in CH3CN (2 mL). The mixture was stirred at 0°C for 10 min. Di-t-butyl dicarbonate (330 mg, 2 eq.) in CH3CN (2 mL) was then added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The solution was then evaporated to dryness. The crude material was purified by column chromatography using Et2O/hexane/Et3N (2/8/0.2), to afford 261 mg (73%) of 7 as an oil. 1H NMR (400.13, CDCl3) : δ 7.49 (s, 1H, H-2′), 7.46 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-4′), 7.14 (brs, 1H, H-6′), 6.93 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 4.47 (m, 2H, H-1+H-5), 3.40 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.12 (s, 1H), 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.06 (m, 1H), 1.97 (m, 1H), 1.76 (m, 1H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.6 (m, 9H). 13C NMR (100.57 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 172.3, 171.8, 146.7, 146.6, 136.7, 136.5, 135.8, 135.7, 131.4, 13.1, 128.0, 127.8, 94.5, 94.3, 79.56, 55.6, 55.3, 53.9, 52.7, 52.1, 51.9, 51.6, 51.5, 35.5, 35.2, 32.3, 29.7, 28.8, 28.5, 27.7.
2.1.5. 3β-(3-Trimethylstannylphenyl)-8-t-butoxycarbonyl-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 8
To a solution of 7 (120 mg, 0.25 mmol) and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine) palladium (25 mg, 0.1 eq.) in anhydrous toluene (20 mL) under argon and stirring, was added hexamethylditin (140 mg, 2 eq.). After being refluxed for 24 h, toluene was evaporated. Purification of the crude material by column chromatography (hexane/Et2O/Et3N 70:30:0.5) afforded 109 mg (84%) of colorless oil. 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 7.05 (m, 4H), 4.3 (m, 2H), 3.24 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.03 (m, 1H), 2.69 (m, 1H), 2.57 (m, 1H), 1.94 (m, 1H), 1.82 (m, 1H), 1.66 (m, 1H), 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.23 (m, 9H, CH3)3-C), 0.06 (s, 9H, Sn(CH3)3). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) : δ 171.9, 171.8, 153.0, 152.68, 142.3, 141.5, 135.4, 135.2, 135.1, 134.2, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 127.7, 79.6, 55.8, 55.5, 53.7, 52.4, 52.3, 51.8, 51.7, 51.4, 36.1, 35.9, 33.1, 30.1, 29.3, 28.6, 27.1, − 9.09.
2.2. In vitro Binding
Assay procedures were based on the following reports: SERT 25, DAT26, and NET 27, using membrane-containing homogenates of male Sprague-Dawley rat (Charles River Labs) forebrain tissue (cerebral cortex for SERT and NET; corpus striatum for DAT), or membranes from cell lines transfected to express human genes of the same transporter proteins (RBI-Sigma; Peng et al. 2004)28. Test agents typically evaluated at ≥ 6 concentrations in duplicate with membrane homogenates in the presence of a [3H]radioligand, with and without a blank agent, as follows: SERT: [3H]cyanoimipramine (DuPont-NEN; 700 pM; blank: 10 μM fluoxetine (donated by Eli Lilly); DAT: [3H]□-CIT (Tocris-Cookson; 300 pM; blank: 10 μM GBR-12909 (RBI-Sigma); NET: [3H]nisoxetine (DuPont-NEN; 350 pM; blank: 10 μM desipramine (RBI-Sigma). Tubes were incubated at RT for 120 min (SERT), on ice for 45 min (DAT), or ice for 180 min (NET). Labeled tissue samples were recovered on a Brandel Cell Harvester on glass fiber filter sheets, washed with ice-cold physiological saline, and counted for tritium in a Wallac liquid scintillation spectrophotometer. Concentration-inhibition curves were computer-fit to determine IC50 ± SEM, and converted to Ki values from the relationship of Cheng & Prusoff: Ki = IC50/(1 + [L/Kd]) 26 (Kula et al. 1999). Selectivity for the SERT was indicated as the ratio of Ki for the DAT or NET to SERT (preference for the SERT site was indicated by a reciprocal).
2.2. Radiochemistry
To a vial containing 333 μL (721 MBq; 19.5 mCi) Na[123I]I solution in a 1-mL conical V-vial was added, in the following order: 67 μL 0.5 M H3PO4 (one-fifth the volume of Na[123I]I), a solution of 50 μg (ca 0.1 μmol) of 3β-(3-trimethylstannylphenyl)-8-t-butoxycarbonyl-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2β-carboxylic acid methyl ester 8 in 50 μL MeOH, and, without delay, 50 μL 6.4% peracetic acid (freshly prepared from 32% CH3CO3H). After 10–20 min at room temperature, 50 μL (0.5 mg) 10 mg/mL aqueous NaHSO3 solution was added and the vial head space was purged into charcoal with a stream of N2 (g) for 10 min. After drying under vacuum, 400 μL MeOH and 2.5 mL 2 M HCl/Et2O was added to the flask and reacted for 10–15 min. After removing the solvent on a rotary evaporator, 300 μL mobile phase and 300 μL saturated NaHCO3 were added and the mixture was purified by HPLC (MeOH/H2O/Et3N: 70/30/0.2), 1 mL/min (retention time of YP256 = 17.4 min). After removal of solvent on the rotary evaporator, the residue was formulated in 5% ethanol/normal saline containing ascorbic acid and filtered through a 0.22 μm sterile filter (Gelman, Acrodisc13) into a sterile 10-mL serum vial. Radiochemical and chemical purity were assessed by HPLC in the same system, with sequential gamma and UV detection, comparing to a standard of nonradioactive authentic YP256.
2.3. In vivo SPECT Imaging
Baboon SPECT imaging was carried out as previously described 29, under institutional animal care protocols complying with Federal regulations. A single female baboon (ovariectomized Papio anubis, 20 kg) was fasted for 18–24 h before the study. At 2 h before injection, the animal was immobilized with intramuscular ketamine (10 mg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (0.01 mg/kg), transferred to the SPECT camera, and immediately intubated with an endotracheal tube for administration of 2.5% isoflurane. Body temperature was kept constant using a heated water blanket, at 36.4 ± 0.3°C. Vital signs, including heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, and body temperature, were monitored every 30 min during the study. An intravenous perfusion line with 0.9% saline was placed and was used for the single bolus injection of [123I]YP256. The baboon’s head was immobilized within the gantry with a “bean bag” that hardens upon evacuation (Olympic Medical, Seattle, WA, USA).
2.3.2. SPECT Data Acquisition
SPECT data were acquired with the brain-dedicated multislice CERASPECT camera (Digital Scintigraphics, Waltham, MA, USA) with a resolution in all three axes of approximately 12 mm full width half-maximum measured using an 123I line source and 20-cm water-filled cylindrical phantom. The distribution of radioactivity was assessed after administration of a single injected bolus of 232 MBq (6.28 mCi). Brain images (128 × 128 × 64 matrix; pixel size = 1.67 × 1.67 mm, slice, thickness = 1.67 mm, voxel volume = 4.66 mm3) were acquired at 159 keV, in step-and-shoot mode at 15 min each for a total of 340 min and 20 acquisitions. Images were reconstructed using a ramp and a Butterworth filter (cutoff = 0.65 cm, power factor = 10). To identify brain regions, MRI scans of 1.5-mm contiguous slices were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE Signa device (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Axial images were acquired using a spoiled GRASS (gradient recall acquisition in the steady state) sequence with TR = 25 ms, TE = 5 ms, NEX = 2, matrix = 256 × 192, field of view = 16 cm.
2.3.3. Image Analysis
SPECT emission images were reconstructed and attenuation corrected as described previously 29 The images were then reoriented to the approximate canthomeatal line by using spatial 3-D reorientation in MEDx (Sensor Systems, Sterling, VA, USA). The first 10 reoriented SPECT images were summed to create an image for which anatomical boundaries could be clearly delineated for coregistration to the MRI scan. The summed image was coregistered to a MRI image of the baboon brain using surface registration in MEDx. .\. Region of interest (ROI) analyses were performed using ROI maps generated from placement of standardized 2-D ROI templates on the coregistered MRI image using a baboon brain atlas as a reference. The regional radioactive densities (counts/pixel) were determined by forming 3-D volumes between 2-D ROIs placed on three adjacent slices (except for the brainstem, which included six adjacent slices) in MEDx. The final 3-D volumes (cm3) were cingulate cortex (1.2), , right and left parietal (R 2.9, L 2.9), frontal (R 3.4, L 3.4), temporoinsular (R 2.2, L 2.2), and occipital (R 2.0, L 2.0) cortices, the right and left striatum (R 1.1, L 1.1), which included the caudate, putamen, and globus pallidus, , and cerebellum (R 1.4, L 1.4), and the diencephalon (1.1) and brainstem (1.4).. The regional brain activities are reported as the average value of the right and left hemispheres. Regional activities were decay-corrected to the time of injection.
3. Results
3.1. Chemistry
Compound 4, prepared in 43% yield by Grignard addition of 3-trimethylsilylphenyl magnesium bromide on ecgonidine methyl ester 3, upon treatment with a solution of iodine monochloride in acetic acid at 60°C, afforded 5 (60%) by electrophilic substitution. N-Demethylation of 5 with 1-chloroethyl chloroformate in 1,2-dichloroethane at reflux gave the nortropane analog 6. N-Protection with di-t-butyl dicarbonate in the presence of 4-N,N-dimethylaminopyridine produced the N-Boc derivative 7 (73%), which upon Stille transformation with hexamethylditin and tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)-palladium gave the corresponding trimethylstannyl derivative 8 (84%).
3.2. Radiochemistry
[123I]YP256 (6; scheme 2) was prepared by iododestannylation of the N-t-Boc-protected trimethylstannyl precursor 8 with [123I]sodium iodide and peracetic acid at room temperature 30. Removal of the N-Boc protecting group by treatment with 2M HCl in ether afforded the radiolabeled nortropane [123I]6. Purification by reverse phase HPLC with concomitant UV and radioactivity detection, allowed identity confirmation of [123I]6 by comparison to its corresponding unlabelled analog. [123I]YP256 was obtained with a labeling yield of 84.9% but isolated yield of final product was 55.5%, owing to adsorption of radiotracer to the membrane filters used for final filtration. Radiochemical purity was 99.0 % and specific activity >185,000 GBq/μmol (>5,000 Ci/mmol), based on the limit of detection of the HPLC UV detector.
Scheme 2.
Radiosynthesis of 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(3′-[123I]iodophenyl) tropane 6
3.3. SPECT Imaging
For all brain regions, peak activity was reached between 8and 24 min pi, then, for the following 4 h, decreased rapidly at rates 9–17%/h During the last 4 to 6 h, the activity levels declined to 1.5–7%/h rates in all brain regions. Overall there was no significant differences in regional[123I]YP256 activity at 4 h (2–3%)
4. Discussion
In the present study, YP256 was labeled with 123I by iododestannylation of the trimethylstannyl precursor and the time course of 123I distribution in brain was assessed by SPECT imaging in a baboon after a single bolus injection. [123I]YP256 entered the brain rapidly and reached peak uptake between 16 and 32 min pi, at a level of 1.2% of the injected dose. In vitro studies on human 5-HTT membranes have shown that YP256 is a high affinity (Ki =1.23 ± 0.04 nM) 5-HT transporter inhibitor that exhibits greater than 400-fold selectivity for 5-HTT compared to DAT (Ki =510 ± 71 nM). The distribution of [123I]YP256 was highest in thalamus and striatum and lowest in cerebellum. The highest ratio between the low and high density region was 1.5 at 90 min PI. The overall low availability of YP256 to the CNS in nonhuman primates may be due, in part, to the high degree of plasma protein binding (e.g., 68%).
These results suggest that in vivo, at tracer doses, in vivo tissue uptake [123I]YP256 may be nonspecific or may be binding to targets distinct from the 5HT transporter.
Figure 2. in vivo distribution of [123I]YP256 in non human primate brain.
Figure 2.
Co-registration of radioactive distribution of 123I with anatomical imaging by MRI in baboon brain after i.v. administration of [123I]YP256.
Figure 3. Time-activity curves for [123I]YP256 uptake in nonhuman primate brain after bolus injection.
Figure 3.
Time-activity curve of 123I in baboon brain after single bolus administration of 232 MBq (6.28 mCi) [123I]YP256. Legend: FC, frontal cortex; PC, parietal cortex; CC, cingulate cortex; OC, occipital cortex; TIC, temporoinsular cortex, BG, basal ganglia, Brstm, brain stem; HA, hippocampal-amygdaloid area, CB, cerebellum.
5. Conclusion
The present study sought to assess [123I]YP256 as a potential tool for in vivo imaging of the serotonin transporter system. Even if YP256 is selective for 5-HTT over DAT in vitro (415-fold) and [123I]YP256 meets requirements of a potential brain radiotracer (e.g., readily labeled in high yield and purity, high total brain uptake), it did not display the expected selective anatomical distribution in vivo in primate brain. Why the in vivo selectivity did not match the in vitro behavior is not clear. Most likely the explanation lies in the different environment that the radiotracer encounters in its interaction with the target protein (DAT vs 5-HTT). In the in vitro binding assay, the transporter protein or tissue is isolated and diluted with assay buffer, so that the behavior can be attributed primarily to the equilibrium between association and dissociation of the radioligand-protein binding. In the in vivo case, on the other hand, the target protein is immobilized on a membrane and the radiotracer is exposed to a sea of competing proteins. This nonspecific binding or weak interactions may raise the background level sufficiently to mask the innate binding specificity, just as it is difficult to accurately measure the difference between two large numbers. Furthermore, in vitro binding assays are carried out at or below 25°C, compared to the 37°C environment in vivo. Indeed, we observed a temperature dependence on binding of the benzodiazepine receptor radioligand [123I]iomazenil both in vitro31 and in vivo32. Based on the results presented in this report, [123I]YP256 is not suitable as a radiotracer for in vivo imaging of 5-HTT. Since we started this project, a large number of radiotracers for PET or SPECT imaging of the serotonin transporter have been reported. All compounds reported for in vivo imaging have very high affinity for SERT ([11C]DASB, [11C] McN5652, [123I]mZIENT, [123I]ADAM). However, as reported recently, SERT radioligands bind to different classes of the transporter and only compounds with Kd between 0.03 and 0.3 nM at 37°C are useful for imaging studies.33
Figure 1.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of 3-(3-Trimethylstannyl-phenyl)-8-aza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2,8-dicarboxylic acid 8-tert-butyl ester 2-methyl ester 8.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by funds from: Young Investigator Award from NARSAD, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (Schizophrenia Research Center) and the US Public Health service (NIMH Grants MH-34006, MH-47370), an award from the Bruce J. Anderson Foundation, and by the McLean Private Donors’ Neuropharmacology Research Fund.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 1973;20:415–455. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(73)90175-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaufman MJ, Madras BK. Synapse. 1991;49:43–49. doi: 10.1002/syn.890090107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niznik HB, Fogel EF, Fassos FF, Seeman P. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1991;56:192–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb02580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haberland N, Hetey L. Journal of Neural Transmission. 1987:227–230. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Owens MJ, Nemeroff CB. Clinical Chemistry. 1994;77(40):288–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Neumeyer JL, Wang S, Milius RA, Baldwin RM, Zea-Ponce Y, Hoffer PB, Sybirska EH, Al-Tikriti MS, Laruelle M, Innis RB. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1991;34:3144–3146. doi: 10.1021/jm00114a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pike VW. Nuclear Medicine & Biology. 1995;22:1011–1018. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(95)02024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dannals RF, Scheffel UA, Suehiro M, Ricaurte GA. Medicinal Chemistry Research. 1994;5:228–244. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crouzel C, Guillaume M, Barre L, Lemaire C, Pike VW. Nuclear Medicine & Biology. 1992;19:857–870. doi: 10.1016/0883-2897(92)90172-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eckelman WC, Mathis CA. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 2006;33:161–164. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Szabo Z, Scheffel U, Mathews WB, Ravert HT, Szabo K, Kraut M, Palmon S, Ricaurte GA, Dannals RF. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 1999;19:967–981. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199909000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buck A, Gucker PM, Schonbachler RD, Arigoni M, Kneifel S, Vollenweider FX, Ametamey SM, Burger C. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2000;20:253–262. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200002000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parsey R, Kegeles LS, Hwang DR, Simpson N, Abi-Dargham A, Mawlawi O, Slifstein M, Van Heertum RL, Mann JJ, Laruelle M. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2000;41:1465–1477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zessin J, Eskola O, Brust P, Bergman J, Steinbach J, Lehikoinen P, Solin O, Johannsen B. Nuclear Medicine & Biology. 2001;28:857–863. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(01)00248-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brust P, Hinz R, Kuwabara H, Hesse S, Zessin J, Pawelke B, Stephan H, Bergmann R, Steinbach J, Sabri O. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:2010–2019. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oya S, Kung MP, Acton PD, Mu M, Hou C, Kung HF. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1999;42:333–335. doi: 10.1021/jm9806751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Houle S, Ginovart N, Hussey D, Meyer JH, Wilson AA. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2000;27:1719–1722. doi: 10.1007/s002590000365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tarkiainen J, Vercouillie J, Emond P, Sandell J, Hiltunen J, Frangin Y, Guilloteau D, Halldin C. Journal of Labelled Compounds & Radiopharmaceuticals. 2001;44:1013–1023. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Blough BE, Abraham P, Lewin AH, Kuhar MJ, Boja JW, Carroll FI. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1996;39:4027–4035. doi: 10.1021/jm960409s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davies HML, Saikali E, Huby NJS, Gilliatt VJ, Matasi JJ, Sexton T, Childers SR. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1994;37:1262–1268. doi: 10.1021/jm00035a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davies HML, Kuhn LA, Thornley C, Matasi JJ, Sexton T, Childers SR. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1996;39:2554–2558. doi: 10.1021/jm9600508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tamagnan G, Baldwin RM, Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ, Innis RB. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2000;10:1113–1115. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00185-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tamagnan G, Fu X, Baldwin RM, Kula S, Baldessarini RJ, Innis RB. Synthesis and binding affinities for monoamines transporters of 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-aromatic substituted phenyl) tropanes. ACS New England Regional Meeting (NERM); Storrs CT. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Still WC, Kahn M, Mitra A. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1978;43:2923–2925. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gurevich EV, Joyce JN. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996;14:309–323. doi: 10.1016/0893-133X(95)00139-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ, Tarazi FI, Fisser R, Wang S, Trometer J, Neumeyer JL. European Journal of Pharmacology. 1999;385:291–294. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00695-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tejani-Butt SM. Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics. 1992;260:427–436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peng X, Zhang A, Kula NS, Baldessarini RJ, Neumeyer JL. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2004;14:5635–5639. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Staley JK, Tamagnan GD, Baldwin RM, Fujita M, Al Tikriti MS, Eshima L, Thornback J, Roe D, Lu L, Seibyl JP, Innis RB. Nuclear Medicine & Biology. 2000;27:547–556. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baldwin RM, Zea-Ponce Y, Zoghbi SS, Laruelle M, Al-Tikriti MS, Sybirska EH, Malison RT, Neumeyer JL, Milius RA, Wang S, Stabin M, Smith EO, Charney DS, Hoffer PB, Innis RB. Nuclear Medicine & Biology. 1993;20:597–606. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(93)90028-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson EW, Woods SW, Zoghbi SS, McBride BJ, Baldwin RM, Innis RB. Life Sciences. 1990;47:1535–1546. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90182-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zoghbi SS, Baldwin RM, Seibyl JP, Al-Tikriti MS, Zea-Ponce Y, Laruelle M, Sybirska EH, Woods SW, Goddard AW, Charney DS, Smith EO, Hoffer PB, Innis RB. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 1992;19:881–888. doi: 10.1016/0883-2897(92)90174-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Elfving B, Madsen J, Knudsen GM. Neuroimaging of the serotonin reuptake site requires high-affinity ligands. Synapse. 2007;61:882–888. doi: 10.1002/syn.20443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]