Abstract
The stereotypical view of the historian is that of a stodgy, bespectacled individual poring over tomes of printed text, dusty manuscripts, and thousands of index cards. In the twentieth century, however, many historians have relied increasingly on technological aids to assist in research. This paper focuses on technological developments of this century that have had some impact on medical history research, beginning with the photostat early in this century. It is argued that online bibliographic databases, although relatively recent and not yet fully developed, are only the beginning of technological aids to historical research. Other computer-assisted historiographical applications are examined and the potentials of developing technologies are explored. The specific and inherent problems of using technology in historical research are also presented, as is the need for an evolving role of libraries in dealing with these problems.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Benison S. Oral history--new technique in medical historiography. Ohio State Med J. 1972 Aug;68(8):770–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett M. A., Litchfield D. H. PROBLEMS OF MICROPHOTOGRAPHY. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1939 Dec;28(2):105–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodman E. Possible uses of MLA's oral history taped interviews. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1981 Jan;69(1):34–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer C. F. BIBLIOFILM SERVICE. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1938 Jan;26(3):153–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olch P. D. A dirty mind never sleeps and other comments on the oral history movement. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1971 Jul;59(3):438–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zinn N. W. The MLA Medical Librarianship Oral History Program. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1987 Jan;75(1):38–39. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]