Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To consider topical anesthetic options available to primary care physicians, indications for their use, and efficacy and safety of these agents as supported by the literature. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Five randomized controlled trials were retrieved that compared various topical anesthetics as well as topical anesthetics versus infiltrative anesthesia. MAIN FINDINGS: A combination of lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine (LET) is currently the topical anesthetic of choice for repair of simple lacerations involving the faces and scalps of children. A promising new topical preparation is bupivacaine and epinephrine, but its efficacy must be studied in larger populations before widespread use can be advocated. Using EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics) for repair of extremity lacerations requires further study and cannot yet be recommended. Continued use of topical tetracaine, adrenaline, and cocaine (TAC) is not supported in the literature, because of its greater expense, its status as a restricted narcotic, its potential for toxicity, and better availability of an equally efficacious alternative, LET. CONCLUSIONS: Children's simple facial and scalp lacerations can be safely repaired using topical LET gel. Physicians must adhere to recommendations to avoid mucous membrane contact and ensure appropriate dosing with these agents. Bupivacaine-epinephrine topical preparation is a promising analgesic agent that warrants further study.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bonadio W. A. TAC: a review. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989 Jun;5(2):128–130. doi: 10.1097/00006565-198906000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dailey R. H. Fatality secondary to misuse of TAC solution. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):159–160. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80303-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daya M. R., Burton B. T., Schleiss M. R., DiLiberti J. H. Recurrent seizures following mucosal application of TAC. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Jun;17(6):646–648. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80409-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ernst A. A., Marvez E., Nick T. G., Chin E., Wood E., Gonzaba W. T. Lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine gel versus tetracaine adrenaline cocaine gel for topical anesthesia in linear scalp and facial lacerations in children aged 5 to 17 years. Pediatrics. 1995 Feb;95(2):255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hegenbarth M. A., Altieri M. F., Hawk W. H., Greene A., Ochsenschlager D. W., O'Donnell R. Comparison of topical tetracaine, adrenaline, and cocaine anesthesia with lidocaine infiltration for repair of lacerations in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Jan;19(1):63–67. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82145-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howell J. M., Chisholm C. D. Wound care. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1997 May;15(2):417–425. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70308-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pryor G. J., Kilpatrick W. R., Opp D. R. Local anesthesia in minor lacerations: topical TAC vs lidocaine infiltration. Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Nov;9(11):568–571. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80227-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith G. A., Strausbaugh S. D., Harbeck-Weber C., Shields B. J., Powers J. D., Hackenberg D. Comparison of topical anesthetics without cocaine to tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine and lidocaine infiltration during repair of lacerations: bupivacaine-norepinephrine is an effective new topical anesthetic agent. Pediatrics. 1996 Mar;97(3):301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. M., Barry R. C. A comparison of three formulations of TAC (tetracaine, adrenalin, cocaine) for anesthesia of minor lacerations in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1990 Dec;6(4):266–270. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199012000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zempsky W. T., Karasic R. B. EMLA versus TAC for topical anesthesia of extremity wounds in children. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):163–166. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]