Abstract
A 4-year prospective study compared the accuracy of the STAPH-IDENT system (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) with that of the reference procedure of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the identification of Staphylococcus species, Stomatococcus mucilaginosus, and Micrococcus species. The study compared the results from 1,106 cultures (500 eye cultures, 217 strains submitted for reference identification, and 389 known stock strains) representing 21 species of the family Micrococcaceae. The overall agreement of genus and species identifications was 81.1%. The percent agreement for the five most common clinical isolates was as follows: Staphylococcus epidermidis, 97.1% (517 isolates); Staphylococcus hominis, 82.5% (57 isolates); Staphylococcus aureus, 77.2% (162 isolates); Staphylococcus haemolyticus, 75.8% (61 isolates); and Staphylococcus warneri, 64.1% (39 isolates). The lowest percent agreement was with Staphylococcus cohnii (11.1%; (9 isolates). Of the 217 isolates sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for identification, 60.4% (131) were correctly identified by the STAPH-IDENT system. Of these, S. epidermidis accounted for 23.9%, S. aureus accounted for 15.6%, S. warneri accounted for 6.9%, Staphylococcus lugdunensis accounted for 6.5%, S. haemolyticus accounted for 5.5%, and S. hominis accounted for 4.1%. The STAPH-IDENT system did not perform adequately when dealing with commonly encountered organisms and is unsuitable for identifying uncommon isolates.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Hussain Z., Stoakes L., Stevens D. L., Schieven B. C., Lannigan R., Jones C. Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staph-Ident system for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):126–128. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.126-128.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hébert G. A., Crowder C. G., Hancock G. A., Jarvis W. R., Thornsberry C. Characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci that help differentiate these species and other members of the family Micrococcaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Oct;26(10):1939–1949. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.1939-1949.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleeman K. T., Bannerman T. L., Kloos W. E. Species distribution of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates at a community hospital and implications for selection of staphylococcal identification procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1318–1321. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1318-1321.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloos W. E., Schleifer K. H. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):82–88. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.1.82-88.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kloos W. E., Wolfshohl J. F. Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):509–516. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.509-516.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Hara C. M., Rhoden D. L., Miller J. M. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhoden D. L., Hancock G. A., Miller J. M. Numerical approach to reference identification of Staphylococcus, Stomatococcus, and Micrococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):490–493. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.490-493.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]