Skip to main content
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
. 2008 Mar 24;2007:18081. doi: 10.1155/2007/18081

Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer in Quantum Dot-Protein Kinase Assemblies

Ibrahim Yildiz 1, Xinxin Gao 2, Thomas K Harris 2, Françisco M Raymo 1,*
PMCID: PMC2279162  PMID: 18401441

Abstract

In search of viable strategies to identify selective inhibitors of protein kinases, we have designed a binding assay to probe the interactions of human phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) with potential ligands. Our protocol is based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and organic dyes. Specifically, we have expressed and purified the catalytic kinase domain of PDK1 with an N-terminal histidine tag [His6-PDK1(ΔPH)]. We have conjugated this construct to CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) and tested the response of the resulting assembly to a molecular dyad incorporating an ATP ligand and a BODIPY chromophore. The supramolecular association of the BODIPY-ATP dyad with the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD assembly encourages the transfer of energy from the QDs to the BODIPY dyes upon excitation. The addition of ATP results in the displacement of BODIPY-ATP from the binding domain of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH) conjugated to the nanoparticles. The competitive binding, however, does not prevent the energy transfer process. A control experiment with QDs, lacking the His6-PDK1(ΔPH), indicates that the BODIPY-ATP dyad adsorbs nonspecifically on the surface of the nanoparticles, promoting the transfer of energy from the CdSe core to the adsorbed BODIPY dyes. Thus, the implementation of FRET-based assays to probe the binding domain of PDK1 with luminescent QDs requires the identification of energy acceptors unable to interact nonspecifically with the surface of the nanoparticles.

1. INTRODUCTION

The outstanding photophysical properties of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) have encouraged the development of binding assays, based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), for the detection of a diversity of biorelevant analytes [15]. Some of these sensing protocols are aimed at the investigation of protein-ligand interactions relying on FRET in QD-protein-dye assemblies. For example, the maltose binding protein (MBP) was expressed with a C-terminal oligohistidine segment to promote its adsorption on the surface of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) [6, 7]. By conjugating the dark quencher QSY9 to β-cyclodextrin, it was shown that titration of the solution containing QD-bound MBP with β-cyclodextrin-QSY9 effectively quenched the nanoparticle luminescence. Such a system was further demonstrated to function as a prototype nanosensor. In fact, the QD luminescence could be restored on subsequent titration with maltose, which competitively displaced β-cyclodextrin-QSY9 from the sugar binding pocket. In principle, a similar strategy could be invoked for the detection of compounds that competitively displace an enzyme-bound dye-labeled substrate for use in high-throughput drug screening assays.

Discovering potent and selective inhibitors of individual members of the protein kinase superfamily has proved to be a long and arduous task. Whereas a large number of high affinity inhibitors have been identified, the majority of such compounds exhibit broad specificity since they typically bind in the ATP-binding cleft shared among all kinase enzymes [810]. The matter is further complicated by the fact that the protein kinase superfamily is the largest enzyme family with an estimated 518 members in the human genome [11]. The broad specificity kinase inhibitors are commonly identified in high-throughput enzymatic screening assays, whereby kinase activity is monitored by phosphorylation-induced fluorescence changes in model peptide substrates. Such enzymatic assays demand active forms of the kinase, which require one or more critical residues to be phosphorylated. Inspection of X-ray structures available for the catalytic domains of different kinases in their phosphorylated and active forms shows highly homologous structures, especially in the ATP-binding cleft [12]. However, known structures of catalytic kinase domains in their unphosphorylated and inactive forms reveal greater divergence of conformational space, which may better accommodate selective binding of compounds that stabilize inactive conformations [12]. Thus, we sought to determine whether competitive displacement of dye-labeled ATP from protein kinase-QD assemblies could be used as a sensitive assay for the detection of compounds that bind either active or inactive forms of kinases.

The human phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) is particularly well suited to initiate development of QD-mediated competitive binding assays. PDK1 is a member of the AGC subfamily of serine-threonine protein kinases and is comprised of an N-terminal catalytic kinase domain and a C-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [13]. Baculovirus-mediated expression in Sf9 insect cells and affinity purification of the recombinant catalytic domain construct of PDK1 (residues 51–359) with an N-terminal His6 tag is well established, and this construct [His6-PDK1(ΔPH)] exhibits high solution stability [1416]. His6-PDK1(ΔPH) catalyzes autophosphorylation of Ser-241 located in its activation or T-loop, which is the only post-translational modification required for its kinase function [1416]. Most interestingly, Ser-241 monophosphorylated His6-PDK1(ΔPH) remains relatively inactive, and it is ultimately activated by allosteric interaction with a phosphorylated hydrophobic motif (HM) at the C-terminus of its protein substrate [1416]. The phosphorylated HM has been termed the “PDK1 interacting fragment” or PIF, and it binds to the PIF pocket on the N-lobe of the PDK1 kinase domain [1720]. Kinetic studies indicate that His6-PDK1(ΔPH) approximates a Rapid Equilibrium Random Bi Bi System so that it readily forms a high-affinity complex with ATP in the absence of protein substrate [15], as exemplified by the X-ray structure reported for the binary enzyme-nucleotide complex [14]. In this article, we report the ability of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) to adsorb on the surface of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with DHLA and the interactions of the resulting assemblies with a compound incorporating an ATP ligand and a BODIPY chromophore within its molecular skeleton.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs were prepared following literature procedures [21, 22] and then coated with DHLA according to an established protocol [23]. His6-PDK1(ΔPH) was expressed using the Bac-to-Bac Baculovirus Expression System (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, Calif, USA) and purified as reported earlier [24]. BODIPY TR adenosine 5′-triphosphate (BODIPY-ATP) was purchased from commercial sources (Invitrogen, Inc.). Visible absorption spectra were recorded with a Varian Cary 100 Bio spectrometer using quartz cells with a path length of 0.5 cm. Emission spectra were recorded with a Varian Cary Eclipse spectrometer in aerated solutions and are uncorrected with the exception of those shown in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Emission spectra of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM in borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1.0 (b), 3.0 (c), 5.0 (d), and 10.0 (e) μM of BODIPY-ATP.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The emission spectrum (a in Figure 1) of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs coated with DHLA in borate buffer (pH = 7.4) shows an intense band centered at 600 nm with a quantum yield of 0.2. The addition of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) to this dispersion affects the emissive behavior of the nanoparticles. Specifically, the luminescence increases with the concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (a–f in Figure 1) in agreement with the adsorption of the protein on the surface of the QDs. Indeed, literature reports [6] demonstrate that the coating of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs with histidine-tagged proteins leads to a luminescence enhancement, as a result of the significant change in the local environment around the emissive inorganic particles. In particular, the plot (see Figure 2) of the emission intensity of our QDs at 600 nm against the relative concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) shows that saturation is reached at a protein/QD ratio of ca. 30. Under these conditions, the luminescence quantum yield of the nanoparticles is 0.4.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Emission spectra of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM in borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) coated with DHLA in the absence (a) and presence of 0.5 (b), 1.0 (c), 2.0 (d), 5.0 (e), and 10.0 (f) μM of His6-PDK1(ΔPH).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Emission intensity at 600 nm of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM in borate buffer, pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) coated with DHLA against the ratio between the concentration of His6-PDK1(ΔPH) and that of the QDs.

The absorption spectrum (a in Figure 3) of BODIPY-ATP shows an intense band for the fluorescent component of this dyad in the visible region. This absorption is positioned in the same range of wavelengths where our QDs emit (b in Figure 3) with an overlap integral of 5.3·10−13 M−1cm3, suggesting that the BODIPY dye can accept the excitation energy of these nanoparticles. The overlap integral (J) was calculated from the emission intensity (I) of the quantum dots, the molar extinction coefficient (ε) of the BODIPY dye and the wavelength (λ) using

J=0Iελ4dλ0Idλ. (1)

Thus, the supramolecular association of the ATP fragment of the dyad with the His6-PDK1(ΔPH) coating of the QDs can be exploited to bring the BODIPY fluorophore in close proximity to the nanoparticles and encourage the transfer of energy from the emissive CdSe core to the organic dye (a in Figure 4). Indeed, the addition of increasing amounts of BODIPY-ATP to the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate alters significantly the emission spectrum (a–g in Figure 5). In particular, the emission band of the QDs at 600 nm fades with an increase in the concentration of BODIPY-ATP. Concomitantly, a second band for the BODIPY fluorophore grows at 624 nm in agreement with the expected transfer of energy from the nanoparticles to the organic dye upon excitation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Absorption spectrum (a) of BODIPY-ATP (30 μM) and emission spectrum (b) of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM) and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The supramolecular association of BODIPY-ATP with His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD encourages the transfer of energy from QD to BODIPY upon excitation (a). ATP displaces BODIPY-ATP from the recognition site of His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD and is expected to prevent energy transfer (b). The nonspecific adsorption of BODIPY-ATP on the surface of QD, however, can also encourage energy transfer (c). Under these conditions, the displacement of BODIPY-ATP by ATP is not sufficient to prevent energy transfer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Emission spectra of a dispersion of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM) and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1.0 (b), 3.0 (c), 5.0 (d), 10.0 (e), 20.0 (f), and 30.0 (g) μM of BODIPY-ATP.

In principle, the addition of a ligand able to displace BODIPY-ATP from the complementary recognition site of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate should result in the physical separation of the nanoparticle donor from the BODIPY acceptor and, therefore, suppress the energy transfer processes (b in Figure 4). Consistently, the addition of increasing amounts of ATP to a solution of the complex formed between BODIPY-ATP and His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD causes a decrease in emission intensity with a concomitant hypsochromic shift (a–f in Figure 6). Instead, the titration of a dispersion of the QDs (0.1 μM) with ATP (0–30 μM) has no influence on their emission spectrum. The deconvolution of the final spectrum (a in Figure 7) shows the observed emission to be the sum of two distinct bands (b and c in Figure 7). One of them (b in Figure 7) is centered at 600 nm, corresponds to the emission of the QDs, and its intensity is significantly smaller than that recorded for a dispersion of the QDs alone (d in Figure 7) under otherwise identical conditions. The other band (c in Figure 7) is centered at 624 nm, corresponds to the emission of the BODIPY dyes, and its intensity is greater than that recorded for BODIPY-ATP alone (e in Figure 7) under otherwise identical conditions. Thus, the QDs recover their luminescence only in part, even after the addition of a relatively large amount of ATP, and still sensitize the emission of the BODIPY dyes under these conditions. These observations suggest that a fraction of the BODIPY-ATP conjugates remains associated with the QDs even in the presence of an excess of ATP (c and d in Figure 4). In agreement with this interpretation, the addition of increasing amounts of BODIPY-ATP to a dispersion of QDs leads to the disappearance of the nanoparticle emission at 600 nm with the concomitant appearance of the BODIPY emission at 624 nm (a–e in Figure 8). Hence, the BODIPY-ATP can accept the excitation energy of the QDs despite the absence of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH) coating around the nanoparticles. These results suggest that the BODIPY-ATP conjugate can adsorb nonspecifically on the QDs, presumably, as a result of interactions between the chromophoric component and the surface of the nanoparticles.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Emission spectra of a mixture of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM), His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM) and BODIPY-ATP (10 μM) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm) in the absence (a) and presence of 1 (b), 3 (c), 11 (d), 31 (e), and 301 (f) μM of ATP.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Emission spectra of a mixture of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM), His6-PDK1(ΔPH) (10 μM), BODIPY-ATP (10 μM) and ATP (301 μM) (a) CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs (0.1 μM) (d) and BODIPY-ATP (10 μM) (e) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4, T = 20°C, λEX = 442 nm). Deconvolution (b and c) of trace a.

4. CONCLUSIONS

The incubation of CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs, coated with DHLA, and His6-PDK1(ΔPH) in borate buffer (pH = 7.4) leads to the adsorption of proteins on the surface of the nanoparticles with a concomitant luminescence enhancement. The dependence of the emission intensity on the protein concentration suggests that an average of ca. 30 proteins adsorb on each QD. The exposure of the His6-PDK1(ΔPH)-QD conjugate to a BODIPY-ATP dyad brings the inorganic nanoparticle in close proximity to the BODIPY chromophore, encouraging the transfer of energy from the former to the latter. Consistently, the emission band of the QDs fades, as the concentration of BODIPY-ATP increases, with the concomitant growth of an emission band for organic dye. The competitive binding of ATP, however, restores the nanoparticle luminescence only in part. Indeed, control experiments show the occurrence of energy transfer between QDs lacking the His6-PDK1(ΔPH) shell and BODIPY-ATP. These observations suggest that the organic chromophore adsorbs nonspecifically on the surface of the nanoparticles. Thus, the development of binding assays for PDK1 based on QDs and FRET demands the identification of strategies to prevent the direct adsorption of the energy acceptor on the surface of the nanoparticle donor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM-69868 to T.K.H.) and National Science Foundation (CAREER Award CHE-0237578 to F.M.R.).

References

  • 1.Sapsford KE, Berti L, Medintz IL. Materials for fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis: beyond traditional donor-acceptor combinations. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2006;45(28):4562–4588. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clapp AR, Medintz IL, Mattoussi H. Förster resonance energy transfer investigations using quantum-dot fluorophores. ChemPhysChem. 2006;7(1):47–57. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200500217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Samia ACS, Dayal S, Burda C. Quantum dot-based energy transfer: perspectives and potential for applications in photodynamic therapy. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 2006;82(3):617–625. doi: 10.1562/2005-05-11-IR-525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Somers RC, Bawendi MG, Nocera DG. CdSe nanocrystal based chem-/bio-sensors. Chemical Society Reviews. 2007;36(4):579–591. doi: 10.1039/b517613c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raymo FM, Yildiz I. Luminescent chemosensors based on semiconductor quantum dots. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2007;9(17):2036–2043. doi: 10.1039/b616017d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Medintz IL, Clapp AR, Mattoussi H, Goldman ER, Fisher B, Mauro JM. Self-assembled nanoscale biosensors based on quantum dot FRET donors. Nature Materials. 2003;2(9):630–638. doi: 10.1038/nmat961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Goldman ER, Medintz IL, Whitley JL, et al. A hybrid quantum dot-antibody fragment fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based TNT sensor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127(18):6744–6751. doi: 10.1021/ja043677l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noble MEM, Endicott JA, Johnson LN. Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure. Science. 2004;303(5665):1800–1805. doi: 10.1126/science.1095920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davies SP, Reddy H, Caivano M, Cohen P. Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochemical Journal. 2000;351(1):95–105. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3510095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bain J, McLauchlan H, Elliott M, Cohen P. The specificities of protein kinase inhibitors: an update. Biochemical Journal. 2003;371(1):199–204. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298(5600):1912–1934. doi: 10.1126/science.1075762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huse M, Kuriyan J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell. 2002;109(3):275–282. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00741-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alessi DR, Deak M, Casamayor A, et al. 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1): structural and functional homology with the drosophila DSTPK61 kinase. Current Biology. 1997;7(10):776–789. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Biondi RM, Komander D, Thomas CC, et al. High resolution crystal structure of the human PDK1 catalytic domain defines the regulatory phosphopeptide docking site. The EMBO Journal. 2002;21(16):4219–4228. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gao X, Harris TK. Steady-state kinetic mechanism of PDK1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281(31):21670–21681. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602448200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gao X, Harris TK. Role of the PH domain in regulating in vitro autophosphorylation events required for reconstitution of PDK1 catalytic activity. Bioorganic Chemistry. 2006;34(4):200–223. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2006.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biondi RM, Cheung PCF, Casamayor A, Deak M, Currie RA, Alessi DR. Identification of a pocket in the PDK1 kinase domain that interacts with PIF and the C-terminal residues of PKA. The EMBO Journal. 2000;19(5):979–988. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.5.979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Biondi RM, Kieloch A, Currie RA, Deak M, Alessi DR. The PIF-binding pocket in PDK1 is essential for activation of S6K and SGK, but not PKB. The EMBO Journal. 2001;20(16):4380–4390. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.16.4380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Frödin M, Antal TL, Dümmler BA, et al. A phosphoserine/threonine-binding pocket in AGC kinases and PDK1 mediates activation by hydrophobic motif phosphorylation. The EMBO Journal. 2002;21(20):5396–5407. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Engel M, Hindie V, Lopez-Garcia LA, et al. Allosteric activation of the protein kinase PDK1 with low molecular weight compounds. The EMBO Journal. 2006;25(23):5469–5480. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dabbousi BO, Rodriguez-Viejo J, Mikulec FV, et al. (CdSe)ZnS core-shell quantum dots: synthesis and characterization of a size series of highly luminescent nanocrystallites. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997;101(46):9463–9475. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peng ZA, Peng X. Formation of high-quality CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals using CdO as precursor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2001;123(1):183–184. doi: 10.1021/ja003633m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mattoussi H, Mauro JM, Goldman ER, et al. Self-assembly of CdSe-ZnS quantum dot bioconjugates using an engineered recombinant protein. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2000;122(49):12142–12150. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao X, Yo P, Harris TK. Improved yields for baculovirus-mediated expression of human His6-PDK1 and His6-PKBβ/Akt2 and characterization of phospho-specific isoforms for design of inhibitors that stabilize inactive conformations. Protein Expression and Purification. 2005;43(1):44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES