Abstract
Birds living in social groups establish dominance hierarchies, and taking up the dominant position influences behaviour and physiological parameters. In cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weavers (Plocepasser mahali), the transition from subordinate helper to dominant breeder male induces the production of a new type of song. This song contains a large number of new syllables and differs in temporal pattern from duet songs produced by all other group members. Here we show that this change in social status of adult males affects the morphology of a behavioural control circuit, the song control system of songbirds that is composed of large neuron populations. The volume of the song control areas HVC and RA and their gene-expression levels depend on males' social status. Dominant males have several times larger testes than subordinates, which is not reflected in circulating androgen and oestrogen levels. Our findings suggest a remarkable differentiation of adult vertebrate brains in relation to changing social cues.
Keywords: song control system, vocal communication, social status, cooperative breeding, brain differentiation
1. Introduction
Changes in social status are known to induce profound changes in territorial and reproductive behaviours, presumably correlated with changes in hormone production and cellular properties of small groups of neuroendocrine neurons (Francis et al. 1993; Gross 1996; White et al. 2002; Burmeister et al. 2005). In the African cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni, males attaining breeding status undergo an increase in the size of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-containing neurons, together with an increase in GnRH gene expression in the preoptic area of the brain (Francis et al. 1993; White et al. 2002). Moreover, the behavioural change is reflected in transiently increased neural activity as indicated by the induction of the immediate-early gene egr-1 (Burmeister et al. 2005). In a recent study on naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber), it was shown that dominance relationships can also influence the gross morphology of brain regions related to reproduction (Holmes et al. 2007). It is, however, unknown whether changes in social status affect the differentiation of a behavioural control circuit, such as the song control system of songbirds that is composed of large neuron populations.
In most social systems, individuals establish dominance hierarchies, and in many cooperatively breeding bird species, non-breeding group members serve as helpers and are subordinate to breeders (Stacey & Koenig 1990). White-browed sparrow weavers (Plocepasser mahali) are cooperatively breeding birds of eastern and southern Africa living in groups of 2–10 individuals in year-round territories with a dominant breeding pair and male and female subordinates (Collias & Collias 1978; Lewis 1982a). Two kinds of subordinates exist: former offspring of the breeding pair and unrelated individuals (Lewis 1982b). Once the dominant position is acquired, individuals normally retain their status of life (Lewis 1982a). White-browed sparrow weavers possess an extraordinary vocal communication system with two types of song: male solo song and duet/chorus song of all group members. Temporal organization and repertoire composition of solo and duet songs are completely different, and mean repertoire sizes comprise 67 and 51 different syllable types, respectively (Voigt et al. 2006). Significantly, male solo singing is strictly status dependent. Only the dominant male of the group performs the solo song, i.e. it possesses two distinct repertoires (Ferguson 1988; Voigt et al. 2006). Solo song is produced at dawn during the breeding season and is thought to function mainly in inter-sexual communication (Ferguson 1988; Voigt et al. 2006). Duet and chorus singing occur year round and are strongly associated with territory defence (Wingfield & Lewis 1993).
The purpose of our study was to investigate the neuroanatomical and physiological correlates of status-dependent song behaviour by analysing the song control system and the plasma steroid hormone levels of birds observed and sampled in Zimbabwe. Neuroanatomical measurements focused on two forebrain song nuclei, HVC and RA (nucleus robustus arcopallii), involved in the production of learned vocal patterns (Nottebohm et al. 1976).
Changes in overall morphology of song areas are thought to depend on gonadal steroid hormones (Gahr & Metzdorf 1997; Tramontin et al. 2003; Ball et al. 2004). The nucleus HVC of most investigated songbirds contains both androgen and oestrogen receptors (Gahr & Metzdorf 1997) which play a key role in regulating testosterone-dependent seasonal plasticity (Tramontin et al. 2003). Here, we observe whether the HVC of both dominants and subordinates is a direct target of androgens and estrogens as reflected in the presence of androgen and oestrogen receptors. Further, we analyse the expression levels of these two genes to see if they would indicate hormone-dependent differences between the HVC of dominants and subordinates on the cellular level (Nastiuk & Clayton 1995; Gahr & Metzdorf 1997; Fusani et al. 2000). In association with that, we included two further genes that have been shown to delineate HVC and express differential steroid-hormone sensitivity, SNAP-25 and synaptoporin, which code for proteins associated with synapses (Voigt et al. 2004).
2. Material and methods
(a) Animals
All birds used for histological analysis (dominant males, n=8; subordinate males, n=8) were sampled at our study site in southwestern Zimbabwe (20°08′ S–20°14′ S; 28°56′–29°01′ E) during the rainy season (January to March in 2000 and 2001, respectively) and derived from groups of individually known birds. The breeding season of white-browed sparrow weavers coincides with the rainy season, which lasts from November until the end of March. Shortly after dusk (19.00–21.00) birds were captured inside their roosting nests. Immediately upon capture, a blood sample was taken by puncturing the wing vein, and after centrifugation with a mini-centrifuge (Bayer diagnostics), plasma was stored at −20°C until analysis. In an earlier study on this species, sampling birds at different times of the day had no effect on plasma steroid hormone levels (J. Wingfield 2006, personal communication). Each bird received a unique combination of aluminium and plastic rings. The sex was determined according to bill colour (Earle 1983). Afterwards all birds were released at their territories. Groups that had at least two males were selected for behavioural observations to identify the social status of the individual birds. Each group consisted of a dominant pair and several subordinates. We identified the dominant pair by breeding activities, their frequent duetting and chasing of other colony members. The dominant male was usually the last bird to enter the roosting nest in the evening, and was the only group member that performed the solo song at dawn (Voigt et al. 2006). We verified this by observing each group thrice at dusk and at dawn. Additional male group members, which were fully mature but did not show the behaviour of the dominant male, were considered subordinate.
(b) Song recording and analysis
Vocalizations were recorded with a Sony TCD-5M cassette recorder (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Sennheiser ME-88 directional microphone (Sennheiser Electronic, Wedemark, Germany). Male solo song was recorded in the morning between 05.00 and 05.45. In previous observations, we determined the approximate starting time, which was generally coincident with or slightly before first light. Recordings were obtained within a distance of 2–10 m from the bird. Solo song was usually produced only once a day at dawn as a single performance, which lasted 10–20 min. Details on sonographic analysis are described elsewhere (Voigt et al. 2006).
(c) Neuroanatomical analysis
Birds were killed with an overdose of chloroform and immediately perfused transcardially, first with 0.9% saline, followed by 4% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde (FPBS). Brains were removed and post-fixed in FPBS at 4°C until analysis. The gonads of each bird were removed and stored in FPBS at 4°C. Brains were removed from FPBS and immersed in 15%, followed by 30% phosphate-buffered sucrose for several days at 4°C. Brains were then cut into 30 μm parasagittal sections and mounted onto Superfrost-Plus slides (Fa. Roth). One series of sections was used for Nissl staining; the others were processed with in situ hybridization for androgen receptor (AR), oestrogen receptor (ER), synaptosomal-associated protein (SNAP-25) and synaptoporin (SPO). The mRNA expression on brain sections was detected with antisense RNA probes of the zebra finch labelled with 35S-CTP and followed a standard protocol with modifications (Whitfield et al. 1990). The cloning of a partial zebra finch AR, ER, SNAP-25 and SPO cDNA was done in our laboratory and has been described previously (Gahr & Metzdorf 1997; Voigt et al. 2004). Slides were analysed under brightfield and darkfield illumination using a Leitz Aristoplan microscope (Leitz Wetzlar, Germany). For volume measurements, the areas of the brain regions HVC and RA were video digitized using a PC equipped with an image analysis system (MetaMorph v. 4.6, Visitron Systems, Germany). Volumes were calculated from every fourth section as the sum of the area sizes multiplied by 120 μm (section interval×section thickness). Telencephalon volume was estimated by sampling every eighth section throughout the extent of the brain hemisphere. Total volume was the sum of the measurements from the right and the left hemispheres. Cell density in HVC and RA was estimated from Nissl-stained sections under high magnification with the help of the image analysis system Metamorph v. 4.6. In each animal at the lateral, central and medial levels of the nucleus (see below), a counting frame of 10 000 μm2 for HVC and 62 000 μm2 for RA was analysed using the digitized images, and the average of these counts was calculated. We sampled a minimum of 160 cells in each nucleus per bird. We counted all profiles that contained one or two nucleoli throughout the entire depth (30 μm) of the section that fell within the boundaries of the counting frame. Density measurements are presented as 104 cells mm−3. The total number of cells in each nucleus was derived from multiplying the cell density by the volume of the nucleus. The mRNA expression in HVC was measured at the lateral, central and medial levels of the nucleus. These levels were estimated according to the Nissl-defined boundaries of HVC. We counted the number of HVC sections (N). Central was the section N/2. This section divided the HVC into a lateral and a medial portion. The lateral level was section Nl/2 and the medial level was section Nm/2 (Nl,m=number of sections in the lateral and medial part, respectively). At each level, four areas (13 100 μm2 each) across HVC were analysed (in total 52 400 μm2). To quantify the level of mRNA expression in an area, the image was converted to a greyscale image. A threshold level was then adjusted to separate the silver grains from the background. The above-threshold fraction of the area was calculated by a built-in function of the software. The mean of these measurements was named mRNA expression level. To correct for different amounts of background labelling, we measured the area covered by silver grains in a region of the same section lacking specific labelling. Correction was done by subtracting the value of background labelling from the value of HVC. ER mRNA expression was measured only at the medial level of HVC and for dominant male, data could be obtained only from six individuals.
(d) Hormone analysis
For the analysis of plasma steroid hormone, levels we obtained blood samples from 27 dominant males and 14 subordinate males. The androgens 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and testosterone (T) and the oestrogen 17β-oestradiol (E2) were measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) after extraction and partial purification on diatomaceous earth (celite) microcolumns using a modification of the methods described (Wingfield & Farner 1975). Antisera were obtained from Endocrine Sciences (Tarzana, USA): DT3-351 (DHT); T3-125 (T); and E17-94 (E2) and labelled steroids from Perkin Elmer Life Sciences. The detection limits (pg ml−1 plasma) of the steroid RIA were 19.0 for DHT, 12.5 for T and 4.0 for E2. The average recoveries were between 64 and 81%. The intra-assay variation was 1.5–2.5%; the inter-assay variation was 4.1–6.0%.
(e) Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using Systat v. 11.0 (Systat Software, Point Richmond, CA, USA). Unless stated otherwise, data are presented as mean±s.e.m. Morphological data were compared between groups with t-tests. The gene expression levels in HVC were analysed using ANOVA with social status as between-subjects factor, and cell density was included as covariate. There was a significant correlation between the cell density and the mRNA expression levels of SNAP-25 (p=0.020) and SPO (p=0.049). To remove this bias we used analysis of covariance. Hormone levels were analysed by non-parametric statistics. All tests were two-tailed, and the significance level was fixed at p<0.05.
3. Results
(a) Morphological predictors of social status
Males of different status did not differ in morphological measurements, such as body weight (t=1.04, d.f.=14, p=0.314) and wing length (t=1.51, d.f.=14, p=0.153). However, testis size was a predictor of social status. Dominants had testes that were approximately thrice larger than that in subordinates (t=3.88, d.f.=14, p=0.002).
On the gross-morphological level of the brain, we compared the regional volume and cell properties of the song control nuclei HVC and RA between both groups of males using Nissl-stained material (figures 1 and 2). Telencephalon volume was used to test for overall differences in brain size between dominants and subordinates but no significant differences were found (t=1.66, d.f.=14, p=0.119). Therefore, we applied no correction in further analyses. Delineation of the nuclei HVC and RA revealed approximately 30% larger volumes of both brain regions in dominant than in subordinate males (HVC: t=4.53, d.f.=14, p=0.0001; RA: t=2.94, d.f.=14, p=0.011; figure 2a). By the analysis of cell density, we verified for HVC that the gross anatomical differences were not the result of differences in cell spacing, as HVC cell density was similar in both groups of males (t=0.15, d.f.=14, p=0.886; figure 2b). Therefore, the volumetric difference of HVC resulted from a difference in cell number (t=3.11, d.f.=14, p=0.008; figure 2c). A different pattern was found in nucleus RA. Dominants had a lower cell density in RA than subordinates (t=2.77, d.f.=14, p=0.015; figure 2b), but RA cell number was similar in both groups of males (t=0.66, d.f.=14, p=0.520; figure 2c).
Figure 1.
Brightfield photomicrographs showing song control nuclei RA (robust nucleus of the arcopallium) and HVC (used as proper name) in Nissl-stained sections of dominant and subordinate males. Arrows indicate boundaries of the nuclei. Both brain areas were approximately 30% larger in dominant than in subordinate males. Dorsal is to the top and caudal is to the right in these parasagittal sections. Scale bar, 300 μm.
Figure 2.
(a) Volumes, (b) cell density, and (c) cell number in song control nuclei HVC and RA of dominant and subordinate males. (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.)
(b) Behavioural predictors of social status
All dominant males were observed singing a solo song at dawn as a continuous performance, lasting on average 12.3±1.9 min (figure 3), whereas subordinate males never sang a solo song. The mean repertoire size of such a song was 68.9±6.0 different syllable types. Solo song repertoire size of dominant males was neither significantly correlated with the volume of HVC (rs=0.072, p=0.882) nor with RA (rs=0.539, p=0.171).
Figure 3.
Sequence from the solo song of a male recorded in Zimbabwe. Solo song is exclusively produced by the dominant male of the group and only at dawn during the breeding season.
(c) Gene expression in HVC reveals phenotype-related pattern
Both dominant and subordinate males expressed androgen (AR) and oestrogen receptors (ER) as well as the synaptic proteins SNAP-25 and synaptoporin in HVC. The expression level of each gene was higher in subordinates than in dominants (AR: F1,13=9.26, p=0.009; ER: F1,11=6.20, p=0.030; SNAP-25: F1,13=9.57, p=0.009; SPO: F1,13=14.36, p=0.002; figure 4a,b). Thus, status-dependent HVC size correlates negatively with status-dependent gene expression.
Figure 4.
Expression levels of (a) androgen (AR) and oestrogen receptors (ER) in medial HVC and (b) the synaptic proteins SNAP-25 and synaptoporin (SPO) throughout HVC of dominant and subordinate males. For SNAP-25 and SPO we used means of lateral, central and medial measurements owing to no regional differences. (*p<0.05, **p<0.01.)
(d) Steroid hormone levels are similar in dominants and subordinates
To reveal whether these status-related differences within the song system correlate with differences in circulating blood hormones, we measured plasma steroid hormone levels in dominant and subordinate males. Our data do not support this hypothesis. The two groups of males did not differ significantly in plasma levels of testosterone (T; median dominant males: 69.57 pg ml−1, range: 12.5–1125.0 pg ml−1, n=27; median subordinate males: 12.50 pg ml−1, range: 12.5–800 pg ml−1, n=14; U=233.0, p=0.209). Plasma levels of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and 17β-oestradiol (E2) were basal and not different between groups (DHT: U=168.0, p=0.253, E2: U=202.5, p=0.514). Further, dominant males actively singing a solo song were not found to have higher testosterone levels than those that did not sing during the period of blood sampling (Fisher's exact test, n=22, p=1.00). There was no correlation between testosterone levels and androgen receptor expression in HVC (dominant males: rs=−0.072, p=0.882, n=8; subordinate males: rs=−0.366, p=0.360, n=8). Similarly, there were no correlations between testosterone levels and HVC cell number in either group of males (p>0.05). In summary, although it is unclear whether such differences in gene expression translate into functional differences in the operation of HVC neuronal circuitry, the results suggest that the differences between dominants and subordinates are not driven by circulating sex steroid hormones.
4. Discussion
This study, based on histological data, suggests that acquiring the dominant position induces large-scale differentiation of the adult song control system. Some songbird species are known to change their song behaviour seasonally such that males sing lengthier songs and more frequently during the breeding season (Catchpole & Slater 1995). In several such species, these behavioural changes correlate with pronounced modifications of the morphology and/or size of the forebrain song control circuit (Tramontin & Brenowitz 2000). In other species, however, activation of seasonal motor memories does not require gross anatomical differentiation. In island canaries (Serinus canaria), there is a seasonal change in the composition of the song syllable repertoire that is not paralleled by seasonal changes in HVC or RA morphology (Leitner et al. 2001).
Functionally, the increase in song nuclei size could relate to the acquisition of a new behaviour that is related to the motor activity of producing solo song. Such a correlation between ‘brain space’ and the capacity of a learned task was initially proposed by Nottebohm et al. (1981) to explain individual differences in syllable repertoire size in domesticated canaries, but subsequent studies on different species failed to produce consistent results (Gahr 2004; Jarvis 2004; Leitner & Catchpole 2004; but see Garamszegi & Eens 2004). Similarly, we found no significant correlations between solo song repertoire size and HVC or RA size among dominant male white-browed sparrow weavers. We propose that the production of the new type of song, the solo song, requires song system reorganization. For HVC, this is indicated by the different gene-expression patterns and the almost non-overlapping HVC sizes in both social groups of males (range of total HVC size in subordinate males, 1.807–2.894 mm3; in dominant males, 2.839–4.482 mm3). As an alternative scenario, the redifferentiation of forebrain song areas might be related to the physical demands of increased dominant male singing activity. In a study of European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) singing activity was reported to predict HVC size (Sartor & Ball 2005). However, such a correlation does not hold for other species (DeVoogd et al. 1995; Li et al. 2000; Boseret et al. 2006).
The underlying cellular mechanisms that drive growth of the song nuclei are speculative, but for HVC concern a large population of cells that need to be recruited (approx. 120 000). Recruitment of new neurons due to protracted neurogenesis is a common process in the adult avian brain and is one possibility for HVC (Goldman & Nottebohm 1983). Social status has been shown to influence neurogenesis in rats, with the most dominant males of the cohorts having higher numbers of new neurons in the hippocampus (Kozorovitskiy & Gould 2004). A higher survival rate of new neurons in forebrain song areas has also been described in zebra finches in response to a more complex social environment (Lipkind et al. 2002). However, in birds, there are large differences between species in the amount of neural recruitment into nucleus HVC, and neural recruitment might also depend on the animals' physiology (Kirn et al. 1994; Scott et al. 2000); therefore the exact process of neurogenesis while becoming dominant still remains to be determined. As an alternative to the incorporation of newly born neurons, cell populations of the nidopallium ventral to HVC might be recruited. For RA, neuronal recruitment in adult birds has never been reported. Developmental and seasonal growth is achieved generally by an increase in soma size and neuronal spacing (Bottjer et al. 1986; Tramontin et al. 1998). Likewise, in our study, dominant male singing behaviour seems to be associated with larger RA neurons, as the total cell number remains constant, while cell density was found to be reduced.
The inductive physiological signal driving cellular changes in the song areas remains unclear. A previous field study on white-browed sparrow weavers showed that stress hormone levels are not related to social status (Wingfield et al. 1991). Thus, removal of the inhibiting action of corticosteroids on neuronal recruitment, as suggested for the rodent hippocampus (Cameron & McKay 1999), is an unlikely explanation for status-induced differentiation of song control areas. Further, steroid hormones could directly act on song areas (via the presence of androgen and oestrogen receptors) but circulating androgens and oestrogens are similar in dominants and subordinates, and receptor expression is even higher in subordinates. In an earlier study on white-browed sparrow weavers, Wingfield et al. (1991) found significantly higher testosterone levels in dominant males compared with subordinates, but these were restricted to a period in the second half of the breeding season. Thus, a similar finding in our birds would not explain the differences between dominant and subordinate males since status-dependent singing behaviour is already present at the beginning of the breeding season (Voigt et al. 2006). Despite our larger sample size compared with the previous study (Wingfield et al. 1991), we confirm their observation that testosterone levels vary individually and show no relationship to any aspect of breeding behaviour (J. Wingfield 2006, personal communication). Our data are, however, insufficient to test for short-term changes in circulating blood hormone levels that may play a role in triggering brain and behavioural reorganization. Such short hormonal peaks might promote neuronal recruitment into HVC, while integrated neurons persist within the network despite subsequent low T levels (Alvarez-Borda et al. 2004). Alternatively, differences in de novo synthesis of steroid hormones in the brains of dominants and subordinates remain a possibility as drivers of neural differentiation locally (Schlinger & Brenowitz 2002). Yet another possibility is the presence of elevated plasma levels of the androgen precursor dehydroepiandrosterone, which can be converted into sex steroids within the brain. This hormone can drive song behaviour and song nuclei growth while plasma T levels are basal (Soma et al. 2002).
Polymorphism, as found in cooperatively breeding bird species, has been well studied in fishes in terms of male alternative reproductive strategies (Bass 1992; Scaggiante et al. 2004). Among higher vertebrates, including humans, intra-sexual variation in behaviour occurs in the context of sexual partner preference and is also reflected at the level of the brain (LeVay 1991; Roselli et al. 2004). Such polymorphic phenotypes are the probable result of ontogenetic differentiation. In contrast, our data suggest that in cooperative breeders such as the white-browed sparrow weavers, the transition from helper to breeder male is most likely due to adult brain redifferentiation and depends on the adult's environment. Whether activational effects of gonadal hormones modulate these brain structures once the dominant position is acquired, e.g. to induce seasonal plasticity, is currently not known, although solo song production is thought to be a seasonal trait (Ferguson 1988).
Permission was given by the Research Council of Zimbabwe to conduct this study.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by funding from the Max Planck Society. We thank the Research Council of Zimbabwe for their permission to conduct this study. We thank P. Mundy, R. Hartley and W. Wickler for support.
References
- Alvarez-Borda B, Haripal B, Nottebohm F. Timing of brain-derived neurotrophic factor exposure affects life expectancy of new neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:3957–3961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308118101. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308118101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ball G.F, Auger C.J, Bernard D.J, Charlier T.D, Sartor J.J, Riters L.V, Balthazart J. Seasonal plasticity in the song control system: multiple brain sites of steroid hormone action and the importance of variation in song behavior. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2004;1016:586–610. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.043. doi:10.1196/annals.1298.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bass A. Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15:139–145. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90356-d. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90356-D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boseret G, Carere C, Ball G.F, Balthazart J. Social context affects testosterone-induced singing and the volume of song control nuclei in male canaries (Serinus canaria) J. Neurobiol. 2006;66:1044–1060. doi: 10.1002/neu.20268. doi:10.1002/neu.20268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bottjer S.W, Miesner E.A, Arnold A.P. Changes in neuronal number, density and size account for increases in volume of song-control nuclei during song development in zebra finches. Neurosci. Lett. 1986;67:263–268. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90319-8. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(86)90319-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burmeister S.S, Jarvis E.D, Fernald R.D. Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030363. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron H.A, McKay R.D.G. Restoring production of hippocampal neurons in old age. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2:894–897. doi: 10.1038/13197. doi:10.1038/13197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catchpole C.K, Slater P.J.B. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1995. Bird song. [Google Scholar]
- Collias N.E, Collias E.C. Cooperative breeding behavior in the white-browed sparrow weaver. Auk. 1978;95:472–484. [Google Scholar]
- DeVoogd T.J, Houtman A.M, Falls J.B. White-throated sparrow morphs that differ in song production rate also differ in the anatomy of some song-related brain areas. J. Neurobiol. 1995;28:202–213. doi: 10.1002/neu.480280207. doi:10.1002/neu.480280207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Earle R.A. An attempt at sexing white-browed sparrow-weavers. Safring News. 1983;12:3–5. [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson J.W.H. Comparison of communication and signalling patterns of white-browed sparrow weavers and other gregarious ploceid weavers. Ostrich. 1988;59:54–62. [Google Scholar]
- Francis R.C, Soma K, Fernald R.D. Social regulation of the brain–pituitary–gonadal axis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1993;90:7794–7798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7794. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.16.7794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fusani L, Van't Hof T, Hutchison J.B, Gahr M. Seasonal expression of androgen receptors, estrogen receptors, and aromatase in the canary brain in relation to circulating androgens and estrogens. J. Neurobiol. 2000;43:254–268. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(20000605)43:3<254::AID-NEU4>3.0.CO;2-W [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gahr M. Hormone-dependent neural plasticity in the juvenile and adult song system: what makes a successful male? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2004;1016:684–703. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.025. doi:10.1196/annals.1298.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gahr M, Metzdorf R. Distribution and dynamics in the expression of androgen and estrogen receptors in vocal control systems of songbirds. Brain Res. Bull. 1997;44:509–517. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00233-5. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(97)00233-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garamszegi L.Z, Eens M. Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behaviour in songbirds. Brain Res. Rev. 2004;44:187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.12.001. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldman S.A, Nottebohm F. Neuronal production, migration, and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult female canary brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1983;80:2390–2394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2390. doi:10.1073/pnas.80.8.2390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gross M.R. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1996;11:92–98. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81050-0. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81050-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmes M.M, Rosen G.J, Jordan C.L, deVries G.J, Goldman B.D, Forger N.G. Social control of brain morphology in a eusocial mammal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:10 548–10 552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610344104. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610344104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis E.D. The science of birdsong. In: Marler P, Slabbekorn H, editors. Nature's music. Elsevier; New York, NY: 2004. pp. 226–271. [Google Scholar]
- Kirn J, O'Loughlin B, Kasparian S, Nottebohm F. Cell death and neuronal recruitment in the high vocal center of adult male canaries are temporally related to changes in song. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:7844–7848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7844. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.7844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozorovitskiy Y, Gould E. Dominance hierarchy influences adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:6755–6759. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0345-04.2004. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0345-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitner S, Catchpole C.K. Syllable repertoire and the size of the song control system in captive canaries (Serinus canaria) J. Neurobiol. 2004;60:21–27. doi: 10.1002/neu.10331. doi:10.1002/neu.10331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitner S, Voigt C, Garcia-Segura L.-M, Van't Hof T, Gahr M. Seasonal activation and inactivation of song motor memories in wild canaries is not reflected in neuroanatomical changes of forebrain song areas. Horm. Behav. 2001;40:160–168. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1700. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeVay S. A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science. 1991;253:1034–1037. doi: 10.1126/science.1887219. doi:10.1126/science.1887219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D.M. Cooperative breeding in a population of white-browed sparrow weavers Plocepasser mahali. Ibis. 1982a;124:511–522. [Google Scholar]
- Lewis D.M. Dispersal in a population of white-browed sparrow weavers Plocepasser mahali. Condor. 1982b;84:306–312. doi:10.2307/1367373 [Google Scholar]
- Li X.-C, Jarvis E.D, Alvarez-Borda B, Lim D.A, Nottebohm F. A relationship between behavior, neurotrophin expression and new neuron survival. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:8584–8589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140222497. doi:10.1073/pnas.140222497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipkind D, Nottebohm F, Rado R, Barnea A. Social change affects the survival of new neurons in the forebrain of adult songbirds. Behav. Brain Res. 2002;133:31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00416-8. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00416-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nastiuk K.L, Clayton D.F. The canary androgen receptor mRNA is localized in the song control nuclei of the brain and is rapidly regulated by testosterone. J. Neurobiol. 1995;26:213–224. doi: 10.1002/neu.480260206. doi:10.1002/neu.480260206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nottebohm F, Stokes T.M, Leonard C.M. Central control of song in the canary Serinus canarius. J. Comp. Neurol. 1976;165:457–486. doi: 10.1002/cne.901650405. doi:10.1002/cne.901650405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nottebohm F, Kasparian S, Pandazis C. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 1981;213:99–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roselli C.E, Larkin K, Resko J.A, Stellflug J.N, Stormshak F. The volume of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the ovine medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus varies with sexual partner preference. Endocrinology. 2004;145:478–483. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1098. doi:10.1210/en.2003-1098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sartor J.J, Ball G.F. Social suppression of song is associated with a reduction in volume of a song-control nucleus in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) Behav. Neurosci. 2005;119:233–244. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.233. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.119.1.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scaggiante M, Grober M.S, Lorenzi V, Rasotto M.B. Changes along the male reproductive axis in response to social context in a gonochoristic gobiid, Zosterisessor ophiocephalus (Teleostei, Gobiidae), with alternative mating tactics. Horm. Behav. 2004;46:607–617. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.016. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlinger B.A, Brenowitz E.A. Neural and hormonal control of birdsong. In: Pfaff D.W, editor. Hormones, brain and behavior. vol. 2. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 2002. pp. 799–839. [Google Scholar]
- Scott L.L, Nordeen E.J, Nordeen K.W. The relationship between rates of HVc neuron addition and vocal plasticity in adult songbirds. J. Neurobiol. 2000;43:79–88. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(200004)43:1<79::aid-neu7>3.0.co;2-p. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(200004)43:1<79::AID-NEU7>3.0.CO;2-P [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soma K.K, Wissman A.M, Brenowitz E.A, Wingfield J.C. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) increases territorial song and the size of an associated brain region in a male songbird. Horm. Behav. 2002;41:203–212. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1750. doi:10.1006/hbeh.2001.1750 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stacey P.B, Koenig W.D. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1990. Cooperative breeding in birds. [Google Scholar]
- Tramontin A.D, Brenowitz E.A. Seasonal plasticity in the adult brain. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:251–258. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01558-7. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01558-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tramontin A.D, Smith G.T, Breuner C.W, Brenowitz E.A. Seasonal plasticity and sexual dimorphism in the avian song control system: stereological measurement of neuron density and number. J. Comp. Neurol. 1998;396:186–192. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980629)396:2<186::aid-cne4>3.0.co;2-x. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980629)396:2<186::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tramontin A.D, Wingfield J.C, Brenowitz E.A. Androgens and estrogens induce seasonal-like growth of song nuclei in the adult songbird brain. J. Neurobiol. 2003;57:130–140. doi: 10.1002/neu.10263. doi:10.1002/neu.10263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voigt C, Metzdorf R, Gahr M. Differential expression pattern and steroid hormone sensitivity of SNAP-25 and synaptoporin mRNA in the telencephalic song control nucleus HVC of the zebra finch. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004;475:83–94. doi: 10.1002/cne.20151. doi:10.1002/cne.20151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voigt C, Leitner S, Gahr M. Repertoire and structure of duet and solo songs in cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weavers. Behaviour. 2006;143:159–182. doi:10.1163/156853906775900739 [Google Scholar]
- White S.A, Nguyen T, Fernald R.D. Social regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Exp. Biol. 2002;205:2567–2581. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.17.2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield H.J, Jr, Brady L.S, Smith M.A, Mamalaki E, Fox R.J, Herkenham M. Optimization of cRNA probe in situ hybridization methodology for localization of glucocorticoid receptor mRNA in rat brain: a detailed protocol. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1990;10:145–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00733641. doi:10.1007/BF00733641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wingfield J.C, Farner D.S. The determination of five steroids in avian plasma by radioimmunoassay and competitive protein-binding. Steroids. 1975;26:311–327. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(75)90077-x. doi:10.1016/0039-128X(75)90077-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wingfield J.C, Lewis D.M. Hormonal and behavioural responses to simulated territorial intrusion in the cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weaver, Plocepasser mahali. Anim. Behav. 1993;45:1–11. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1001 [Google Scholar]
- Wingfield J.C, Hegner R.E, Lewis D.M. Circulating levels of luteinizing hormone and steroid hormones in relation to social status in the cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weaver Plocepasser mahali. J. Zool. 1991;225:43–58. [Google Scholar]
Notice of correction
The third sentence of §3(d) is now present in the correct form.
17 September 2007




