Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Feb;33(2):313–317. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.313-317.1995

Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system.

P Rohner 1, B Pepey 1, R Auckenthaler 1
PMCID: PMC227939  PMID: 7714185

Abstract

The BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika Corp., Durham, N.C.) is an automated blood culture system. It is based on the detection of CO2 by means of a colorimetric sensor internally attached to the bottom of culture bottles. The aerobic and anaerobic media of this system were compared with one bottle of the Signal system (Oxoid Ltd., Hampshire, United Kingdom). At bedside, 20 ml of blood was drawn from each adult patient. The two BacT/Alert bottles were inoculated with 5 ml of blood each; the Signal bottle was inoculated with 10 ml. A total of 5,284 sets (2,483 patients; 2.1 cultures per patient) consisting of three bottles each were evaluated, of which 781 sets (14.8%) revealed microorganisms (n = 892); 642 of these were considered to be pathogenic. Significantly more (P < 0.0001) pathogens were isolated from the two BacT/Alert bottles together (n = 584) than from the single Signal bottle (n = 515). Escherichia coli (P = 0.007), gram-negative bacteria other than members of the family Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas spp. (P = 0.006), and yeasts (P = 0.02) were isolated more often from both or either BacT/Alert bottle. Comparing the systems in terms of 388 different organisms per septic episode, the difference between BacT/Alert and Signal was significant for the total number of septicemia cases (P = 0.003). More contaminants grew in the BacT/Alert system (173 versus 116; P = 0.0001). False-positive indications were more frequent in the BacT/Alert system, 198 (3.7%) aerobic bottles and 57 (1.1%) anaerobic bottles, than in the Signal bottles, 24 (0.5%) bottles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (193.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Doern G. V., Vautour R., Gaudet M., Levy B. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1757–1762. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eykyn S. J., Gransden W. R., Phillips I. The causative organisms of septicaemia and their epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Apr;25 (Suppl 100):41–58. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.suppl_c.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107–110. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mermel L. A., Maki D. G. Detection of bacteremia in adults: consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Aug 15;119(4):270–272. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-4-199308150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morris A. J., Wilson M. L., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Rationale for selective use of anaerobic blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2110–2113. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2110-2113.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roberts F. J., Geere I. W., Coldman A. A three-year study of positive blood cultures, with emphasis on prognosis. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13(1):34–46. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rohner P., Burkardt H., Dreismann H., Auckenthaler R. Evaluation of the new improved BHI-lysis blood culture medium for the BCB Roche system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Aug;10(8):620–624. doi: 10.1007/BF01975812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sawhney D., Hinder S., Swaine D., Bridson E. Y. Novel method for detecting micro-organisms in blood cultures. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Nov;39(11):1259–1263. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.11.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Solomon H. M., Jackson D. Rapid diagnosis of Brucella melitensis in blood: some operational characteristics of the BACT/ALERT. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):222–224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.222-224.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thorpe T. C., Wilson M. L., Turner J. E., DiGuiseppi J. L., Willert M., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. BacT/Alert: an automated colorimetric microbial detection system. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1608–1612. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1608-1612.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Reimer L. G., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2103–2106. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2103-2106.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES