Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Feb;33(2):364–370. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995

Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.

A Robinson 1, Y S McCarter 1, J Tetreault 1
PMCID: PMC227949  PMID: 7714193

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of the Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system (Crystal; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.), API 20E (API; bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), and the Vitek GNI card (Vitek; bioMérieux Vitek) was performed with 512 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli, including 381 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and 131 nonenteric bacilli. With supplemental testing, API, Crystal, and Vitek correctly identified to the genus and species level 505 (98.6%), 489 (95.5%), and 494 (96.5%) of the 512 isolates, respectively. Supplemental testing, as specified by the manufacturer, was required to identify 119 (23.2%), 18 (3.5%), and 5 (1.0%) of the isolates with the three systems, respectively. Of the 381 isolates from the family Enterobacteriaceae, API and Crystal correctly identified 90.3 and 91.6% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 92.4 and 96.1% following 10 and 18 h of incubation, respectively. Of the 131 nonenteric organisms, API and Crystal correctly identified 28.2 and 93.9% by 18 to 24 h without supplemental testing, respectively, and Vitek identified 84.0% by 10 h and 93.9% by 18 h. Errors in identification with each system were infrequent and appeared to be randomly distributed among the genera evaluated. The three systems were comparable in accuracy when either a weighted clinical laboratory profile of organisms or a group of selected isolates in a stress test sample was evaluated (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the three systems in their ability to identify either the isolates in the weighted group or those in the stress test (P > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (185.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aldridge K. E., Hodges R. L. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):120–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.120-125.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Costigan W. J., Hollick G. E. Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301–302. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.301-302.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmes B., Costas M., Thaker T., Stevens M. Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2221–2224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2221-2224.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jorgensen J. H., Johnson J. E., Alexander G. A., Paxson R., Alderson G. L. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Jun;79(6):683–687. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/79.6.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCarthy L. R., Mayo J. B., Bell G., Armstrong D. Comparison of a commercial identification kit and conventional biochemical tests used for the identification of enteric gram-negative rods. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Feb;69(2):161–164. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/69.2.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller J. M. Evaluating biochemical identification systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Aug;29(8):1559–1561. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.8.1559-1561.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Hara C. M., Miller J. M. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A system for rapid (2-hour) identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1541–1543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1541-1543.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Hara C. M., Rhoden D. L., Miller J. M. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):123–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Hara C. M., Tenover F. C., Miller J. M. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3165–3169. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pfaller M. A., Bale M. J., Schulte K. R., Koontz F. P. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jan;23(1):1–5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.1.1-5.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfaller M. A., Sahm D., O'Hara C., Ciaglia C., Yu M., Yamane N., Scharnweber G., Rhoden D. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jul;29(7):1422–1428. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1422-1428.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rhoden D. L., Schable B., Smith P. B. Evaluation of PASCO MIC-ID system for identifying gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Dec;25(12):2363–2366. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.12.2363-2366.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rhoden D. L., Smith P. B., Baker C. N., Schable B. autoSCAN-4 system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):915–918. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.915-918.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith P. B., Tomfohrde K. M., Rhoden D. L., Balows A. API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Sep;24(3):449–452. doi: 10.1128/am.24.3.449-452.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Staneck J. L., Weckbach L. S., Tilton R. C., Zabransky R. J., Bayola-Mueller L., O'Hara C. M., Miller J. M. Collaborative evaluation of the Radiometer Sensititre AP80 for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1179–1184. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1179-1184.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Visser M. R., Bogaards L., Rozenberg-Arska M., Verhoef J. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek Automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):979–984. doi: 10.1007/BF01967786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Washington J. A., 2nd, Yu P. K., Martin W. J. Evaluation of accuracy of multitest micromethod system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Sep;22(3):267–269. doi: 10.1128/am.22.3.267-269.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. York M. K., Brooks G. F., Fiss E. H. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid system for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative fermentative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2903–2910. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2903-2910.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES