Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Mar;33(3):551–555. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.551-555.1995

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus.

T L Bannerman 1, G A Hancock 1, F C Tenover 1, J M Miller 1
PMCID: PMC227989  PMID: 7751356

Abstract

Bacteriophage typing (BT) (World Health Organization method) has been used at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for over 30 years to type isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Since studies have shown that BT patterns have poor reproducibility and because BT fails to type a high percentage (15 to 20%) of isolates, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has converted from using BT to using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for strain typing S. aureus. We compared the results of BT with results of PFGE for typing 300 isolates of S. aureus, including strains from several well-characterized outbreaks. Ninety-six isolates were BT group I, 19 were group II, 82 were group III, 7 were group V, and 96 were nontypeable. PFGE identified subgroups within each phage group and thus was more discriminating than BT, which identified no subgroups. PFGE was able to type all isolates and distinguish related from unrelated strains of S. aureus. Our modified, standardized PFGE methodology should enable typing laboratories to obtain rapid, reliable results in 3 to 4 days when starting with an isolated colony on agar media.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (345.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASHESHOV E. H., RIPPON J. E. Changes in typing pattern of phage-type 80 staphylococci. J Gen Microbiol. 1959 Jun;20(3):634–643. doi: 10.1099/00221287-20-3-634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COMTOIS R. D. Changes in the phage-typing patterns of Staphlococci following lysogenization with a related group of Staphylococcus bacteriophages. Can J Microbiol. 1960 Oct;6:491–502. doi: 10.1139/m60-057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chowdhury M. N., Kambal A. M. An outbreak of infection due to Staphylococcus aureus phage type 52 in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 1992 Dec;22(4):299–305. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90015-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goering R. V., Winters M. A. Rapid method for epidemiological evaluation of gram-positive cocci by field inversion gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Mar;30(3):577–580. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.3.577-580.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ichiyama S., Ohta M., Shimokata K., Kato N., Takeuchi J. Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2690–2695. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2690-2695.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Linhardt F., Ziebuhr W., Meyer P., Witte W., Hacker J. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments as a tool for the epidemiological analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992 Aug 15;74(2-3):181–185. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90426-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prevost G., Jaulhac B., Piemont Y. DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Apr;30(4):967–973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.967-973.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stewart P. R., el-Adhami W., Inglis B., Franklin J. C. Analysis of an outbreak of variably methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with chromosomal RFLPs and mec region probes. J Med Microbiol. 1993 Apr;38(4):270–277. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-4-270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Struelens M. J., Deplano A., Godard C., Maes N., Serruys E. Epidemiologic typing and delineation of genetic relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2599–2605. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2599-2605.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tenover F. C., Arbeit R., Archer G., Biddle J., Byrne S., Goering R., Hancock G., Hébert G. A., Hill B., Hollis R. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):407–415. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.407-415.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vindel A., Trincado P., Martín de Nicolás M. M., Gómez E., Martín Bourgon C., Sáez Nieto J. A. Hospital infections in Spain. I. Staphylococcus aureus (1978-91). Epidemiol Infect. 1993 Jun;110(3):533–541. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800050950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wei M. Q., Grubb W. B. Typing of Australian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. J Med Microbiol. 1992 Sep;37(3):187–191. doi: 10.1099/00222615-37-3-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wenzel R. P., Nettleman M. D., Jones R. N., Pfaller M. A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: implications for the 1990s and effective control measures. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):221S–227S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90372-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES