Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Mar;33(3):755–758. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.755-758.1995

Techniques for controlling variability in gram staining of obligate anaerobes.

M J Johnson 1, E Thatcher 1, M E Cox 1
PMCID: PMC228030  PMID: 7538512

Abstract

Identification of anaerobes recovered from clinical samples is complicated by the fact that certain gram-positive anaerobes routinely stain gram negative; Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus, Eubacterium plautii, Clostridium ramosum, Clostridium symbiosum, and Clostridium clostridiiforme are among the nonconformists with regard to conventional Gram-staining procedures. Accurate Gram staining of American Type Culture Collection strains of these anaerobic bacteria is possible by implementing fixing and staining techniques within a gloveless anaerobic chamber. Under anaerobic conditions, gram-positive staining occurred in all test organisms with "quick" fixing techniques with both absolute methanol and formalin. The results support the hypothesis that, when anaerobic bacteria are exposed to oxygen, a breakdown of the physical integrity of the cell wall occurs, introducing Gram stain variability in gram-positive anaerobes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (691.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARTHOLOMEW J. W., FINKELSTEIN H. Relationship of cell wall staining to gram differentiation. J Bacteriol. 1958 Jan;75(1):77–84. doi: 10.1128/jb.75.1.77-84.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basu P. S., Biswas B. B., Pal M. K. Extraction of crystal violet-iodine complex from Gram positive bacteria by different solvents and its implication on Gram differentiation. Histochemie. 1968;14(3):221–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00306318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beveridge T. J., Davies J. A. Cellular responses of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli to the Gram stain. J Bacteriol. 1983 Nov;156(2):846–858. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.2.846-858.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Citron D. M. Specimen collection and transport, anaerobic culture techniques, and identification of anaerobes. Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Mar-Apr;6 (Suppl 1):S51–S58. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_1.s51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feleke G., Forlenza S. Anaerobic infections. The basics for primary care physicians. Postgrad Med. 1991 Jun;89(8):221-4, 227-30, 233-4. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1991.11700965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Magee C. M., Rodeheaver G., Edgerton M. T., Edlich R. F. A more reliable gram staining technic for diagnosis of surgical infections. Am J Surg. 1975 Sep;130(3):341–346. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90398-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mangels J. I., Cox M. E., Lindberg L. H. Methanol fixation. An alternative to heat fixation of smears before staining. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1984 Apr;2(2):129–137. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(84)90008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES