Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Apr;33(4):802–804. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.802-804.1995

Evaluation of five new plating media for isolation of Salmonella species.

H Dusch 1, M Altwegg 1
PMCID: PMC228044  PMID: 7790441

Abstract

A three-phase study was conducted to compare Hektoen enteric agar (HE), Rambach agar (Ra), SM-ID medium (SM), xylose-lysine-Tergitol 4 agar (XLT4), novobiocin-brilliant green-glycerol-lactose agar (NBGL), and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV) for the recovery of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool specimens. After evaluation of the first two phases, which resulted in the elimination of Ra, SM, and NBGL, 593 consecutive stool samples were investigated by plating them directly and after tetrathionate enrichment at 37 degrees C on HE, XLT4, and MSRV. A total of 82 Salmonella-positive stool specimens were detected (positivity rate, 13.8%). Sensitivities for direct plating and after tetrathionate enrichment were 32.9 and 86.6%, respectively, for XLT4, 63.4 and 100.0%, respectively, for MSRV, and 34.1 and 79.3%, respectively, for HE. Specificities (percentage of morphologically suspicious colonies that were indeed salmonellae) were 100.0 and 99.8%, respectively, for XLT4, 99.0 and 98.8%, respectively, for MSRV, and 67.9 and 75.0%, respectively, for HE. The use of MSRV instead of HE increased the isolation rate of salmonellae by 26.2% (65 versus 82 strains isolated from HE and MSRV, respectively). We conclude that MSRV is the most sensitive medium tested and is a very specific medium for the isolation of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool specimens. However, its semisolid nature is a disadvantage and requires careful handling in the laboratory, especially when salmonellae are present. XLT4 had a sensitivity comparable to that of HE and a nearly 100% specificity and can be regarded as an alternative for the isolation of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool samples.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aspinall S. T., Hindle M. A., Hutchinson D. N. Improved isolation of salmonellae from faeces using a semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Oct;11(10):936–939. doi: 10.1007/BF01962379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Zutter L., De Smedt J. M., Abrams R., Beckers H., Catteau M., de Borchgrave J., Debevere J., Hoekstra J., Jonkers F., Lenges J. Collaborative study on the use of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the detection of Salmonella from foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 1991 May;13(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(91)90131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dusch H., Altwegg M. Comparison of Rambach agar, SM-ID medium, and Hektoen Enteric agar for primary isolation of non-typhi salmonellae from stool samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Feb;31(2):410–412. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.410-412.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fey H., Bürgi E., Margadant A., Boller E. An economic and rapid diagnostic procedure for the detection of salmonella/shigella using the polyvalent salmonella phage O-1. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1978 Jan;240(1):7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goossens H., Wauters G., de Boeck M., Janssens M., Butzler J. P. Semisolid selective-motility enrichment medium for isolation of salmonellae from fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;19(6):940–941. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.6.940-941.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Heizmann W. R. Evaluation of Rambach agar for rapid detection of Salmonella in human feces. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Apr;12(4):306–308. doi: 10.1007/BF01967268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hine E. A., Stefen E. K., Wagner J. E. New semisolid agar for the detection of motile salmonellae. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):875–878. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.875-878.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. King S., Metzger W. I. A new plating medium for the isolation of enteric pathogens. I. hektoen enteric agar. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Apr;16(4):577–578. doi: 10.1128/am.16.4.577-578.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller R. G., Tate C. R., Mallinson E. T., Scherrer J. A. Xylose-lysine-tergitol 4: an improved selective agar medium for the isolation of Salmonella. Poult Sci. 1991 Dec;70(12):2429–2432. doi: 10.3382/ps.0702429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Poisson D. M. Novobiocin, brilliant green, glycerol, lactose agar: a new medium for the isolation of Salmonella strains. Res Microbiol. 1992 Feb;143(2):211–216. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(92)90010-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rambach A. New plate medium for facilitated differentiation of Salmonella spp. from Proteus spp. and other enteric bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jan;56(1):301–303. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.1.301-303.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Siegrist H. H., Altwegg M., Wenger A., Isenrich H., von Graevenitz A. Evaluation of a small "conventional" identification system for fermentative gramnegative rods using a computerized data base. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1987 Oct;266(3-4):370–378. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80217-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES