Abstract
Cervical cancer screening programs have been one of the most important developments in women's health care during the past 50 years. Sound knowledge of the principles and techniques for taking Papanicolaou smears, interpreting results, and investigating abnormalities detected are essential skills for individuals providing primary health care to women. The author briefly reviews the current investigatory methods and the common treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive cancer of the cervix.
Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, family medicine, gynecology, oncology
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baggish M. S. The state of the art of laser surgery in gynecology, 1985. Lasers Surg Med. 1986;6(4):390–395. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1900060408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedet J. L., Anderson G. H., Simpson M. L., Shaw D. Colposcopy, conization, and hysterectomy practices: a current perspective. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov;60(5):539–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedet J. L., Miller D. M., Nickerson K. G., Anderson G. H. The results of cryosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia at one, five, and ten years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;157(2):268–273. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80149-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benedet J. L., Nickerson K. G., Anderson G. H. Cryotherapy in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Dec;58(6):725–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyes D. A., Worth A. J., Fidler H. K. The results of treatment of 4389 cases of preclinical cervical squamous carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1970 Sep;77(9):769–780. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1970.tb04397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burghardt E., Holzer E. Treatment of carcinoma in situ: evaluation of 1609 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May;55(5):539–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Jun 5;114(11):1013–1026. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Claman A. D., Lee N. Factors that relate to complications of cone biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Sep;120(1):124–128. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(74)90189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hollyock V. E., Chanen W. Electrocoagulation diathermy for the treatment of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Feb;47(2):196–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolstad P., Klem V. Long-term followup of 1121 cases of carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Aug;48(2):125–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee N. H. The effect of cone biopsy on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Gynecol Oncol. 1978 Feb;6(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(78)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masterson B. J., Krantz K. E., Calkins J. W., Magrina J. F., Carter R. P. The carbon dioxide laser in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a five-year experience in treating 230 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Mar 1;139(5):565–567. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90517-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
