Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Apr;33(4):1016–1018. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.1016-1018.1995

Evaluation of a modified nitrous acid extraction latex agglutination kit for grouping beta-hemolytic streptococci and enterococci.

D N Petts 1
PMCID: PMC228090  PMID: 7790427

Abstract

The rapid and accurate identification of the Lancefield group of beta-hemolytic streptococci and enterococci is an important procedure in clinical laboratories. Latex agglutination techniques are more rapid and technically less demanding than traditional extraction-precipitation methods. Prolex (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada) is a latex agglutination kit which contains modified nitrous acid reagents to extract antigens and can be used to detect group D antigen in streptococci and enterococci, as well as group A, B, C, F, and G antigens. A total of 302 strains of streptococci and enterococci were tested with this kit. All streptococci of groups A (41 strains), B (39 strains), C (35 strains), D (3 strains), F (10 strains), and G (48 strains) were correctly grouped, as were 125 (97%) of 129 strains of enterococci. Prolex is a reliable method for grouping the beta-hemolytic streptococci and enterococci most frequently encountered in clinical laboratories.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birch B. R., Keaney M. G., Ganguli L. A. Antibiotic susceptibility and biochemical properties of Streptococcus faecalis strains reacting with both D and G antisera. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Nov;37(11):1289–1292. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.11.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Daly J. A., Seskin K. C. Evaluation of rapid, commercial latex techniques for serogrouping beta-hemolytic streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2429–2431. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2429-2431.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Devriese L. A., Pot B., Collins M. D. Phenotypic identification of the genus Enterococcus and differentiation of phylogenetically distinct enterococcal species and species groups. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Nov;75(5):399–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freney J., Bland S., Etienne J., Desmonceaux M., Boeufgras J. M., Fleurette J. Description and evaluation of the semiautomated 4-hour rapid ID 32 Strep method for identification of streptococci and members of related genera. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2657–2661. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2657-2661.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Petts D. N., Lane A., Kennedy P., Hadfield S. G., McIllmurray M. B. Direct detection of groups A, C and G streptococci in clinical specimens by a trivalent colour test. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;7(1):34–39. doi: 10.1007/BF01962168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. You M. S., Facklam R. R. New test system for identification of Aerococcus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus species. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;24(4):607–611. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.607-611.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES