Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 May;33(5):1094–1097. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1094-1097.1995

Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods of MIC endpoint determinations by using broth microdilution methods to test five antifungal agents, including the new triazole D0870.

M A Pfaller 1, S A Messer 1, S Coffmann 1
PMCID: PMC228111  PMID: 7615712

Abstract

A study to compare three different methods for reading MIC endpoints tested by the broth microdilution modification of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (Villanova, Pa.) reference method was conducted. MICs of amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, and a new triazole, D0870, were determined for five reference yeast strains and 100 clinical isolates of Candida spp. MICs were read visually according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines from microdilution trays that had been (VS) and had not been (V) shaken. MICs were also determined spectrophotometrically (SP) at 492 nm. SP endpoints were determined as the concentrations resulting in a > or = 50% inhibition of growth (flucytosine and azoles) and a > or = 90% inhibition of growth (amphotericin B) relative to control growth. The five reference strains were tested nine times each against all five antifungal agents, and the MIC results for each reading method were compared with a 3-log2 dilution reference range determined by the macrodilution (M27-P) method. Overall, 84 to 100% of the MICs determined by V, 93 to 100% of those determined by VS, and 89 to 100% of those determined by SP fell within the 3-log2 dilution reference range for each reference strain and antifungal agent. Reproducibility was 99% for V and SP and 98% for VS. Agreement among the three methods of reading ranged from 97 to 99%. Excellent agreement among reading methods was also observed for all antifungal agents when tested against 100 clinical isolates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (173.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anaissie E., Paetznick V., Bodey G. P. Fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans: microtiter method that is independent of inoculum size, temperature, and time of reading. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Aug;35(8):1641–1646. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.8.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barchiesi F., Del Poeta M., Morbiducci V., Ancarani F., Scalise G. Turbidimetric and visual criteria for determining the in vitro activity of six antifungal agents against Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycopathologia. 1993 Oct;124(1):19–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01103052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Espinel-Ingroff A., Kerkering T. M., Goldson P. R., Shadomy S. Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jun;29(6):1089–1094. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1089-1094.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Espinel-Ingroff A., Kish C. W., Jr, Kerkering T. M., Fromtling R. A., Bartizal K., Galgiani J. N., Villareal K., Pfaller M. A., Gerarden T., Rinaldi M. G. Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138–3145. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3138-3145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fromtling R. A., Galgiani J. N., Pfaller M. A., Espinel-Ingroff A., Bartizal K. F., Bartlett M. S., Body B. A., Frey C., Hall G., Roberts G. D. Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jan;37(1):39–45. doi: 10.1128/aac.37.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galgiani J. N., Rinaldi M. G., Polak A. M., Pfaller M. A. Standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing. J Med Vet Mycol. 1992;30 (Suppl 1):213–224. doi: 10.1080/02681219280000911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pfaller M. A., Bale M. J., Buschelman B., Rhomberg P. Antifungal activity of a new triazole, D0870, compared with four other antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates of Candida and Torulopsis glabrata. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jun;19(2):75–80. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90116-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pfaller M. A., Bale M., Buschelman B., Lancaster M., Espinel-Ingroff A., Rex J. H., Rinaldi M. G., Cooper C. R., McGinnis M. R. Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1104–1107. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1104-1107.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfaller M. A., Bale M., Buschelman B., Lancaster M., Espinel-Ingroff A., Rex J. H., Rinaldi M. G. Selection of candidate quality control isolates and tentative quality control ranges for in vitro susceptibility testing of yeast isolates by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards proposed standard methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1650–1653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1650-1653.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Aug;32(8):1992–1996. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1992-1996.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pfaller M. A., Grant C., Morthland V., Rhine-Chalberg J. Comparative evaluation of alternative methods for broth dilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):506–509. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.506-509.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G. Antifungal susceptibility testing. Current state of technology, limitations, and standardization. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;7(2):435–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pfaller M. A., Vu Q., Lancaster M., Espinel-Ingroff A., Fothergill A., Grant C., McGinnis M. R., Pasarell L., Rinaldi M. G., Steele-Moore L. Multisite reproducibility of colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1625–1628. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1625-1628.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Price M. F., LaRocco M. T., Gentry L. O. Fluconazole susceptibilities of Candida species and distribution of species recovered from blood cultures over a 5-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jun;38(6):1422–1424. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.6.1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rex J. H., Pfaller M. A., Rinaldi M. G., Polak A., Galgiani J. N. Antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):367–381. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.4.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sewell D. L., Pfaller M. A., Barry A. L. Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2099–2102. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2099-2102.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES