Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 May;33(5):1185–1191. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1185-1191.1995

Continuous quality improvement for introduction of automated blood culture instrument.

M Alfa 1, S Sanche 1, S Roman 1, Y Fiola 1, P Lenton 1, G Harding 1
PMCID: PMC228128  PMID: 7615727

Abstract

Despite the critical nature and high cost of blood cultures, hospitals rely on manufacturers' test site data. As a result, in-hospital testing and compliance evaluation of newly acquired instruments are seldom done. The goal of this study was to apply a continuous quality improvement approach and to develop assessment criteria for all stages from the purchase order, through the on-site instrument evaluation, to the compliance evaluation. Despite the introduction of an automated high-blood-volume instrument (BacT/Alert) in our hospital, 56% of adult patients had only one venipuncture and 89.5% had < or = 20 ml of total blood volume sampled. False positives were associated with overfilling of bottles. These problems occurred because the phlebotomists did not like to perform multiple venipunctures on ill patients; therefore, they were drawing 20 ml of blood from one venipuncture and splitting it between two bottles. Unknown to the staff, the vacuum in the bottles draws significantly more than 10 ml of blood; therefore, the first bottle in the set was frequently overfilled and the second bottle was frequently underfilled. A diagrammatic guideline for a new blood culture protocol based on two venipunctures, taken one immediately after the other, to inoculate three bottles was developed. Compliance evaluation demonstrated that within 1 month of starting the new protocol, 74% of patients had at least two or more venipunctures and 60% had > or = 30 ml of blood drawn per patient episode. This study demonstrates the need for continuous quality improvement, including compliance evaluation, to ensure that the potential benefits of newer blood culture technology are actually realized.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (225.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bartlett R. C., Mazens-Sullivan M., Tetreault J. Z., Lobel S., Nivard J. Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55–88. doi: 10.1128/cmr.7.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryan C. S. Clinical implications of positive blood cultures. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Oct;2(4):329–353. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.4.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campos J. M. Detection of bloodstream infections in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):815–824. doi: 10.1007/BF02185854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doern G. V., Vautour R., Gaudet M., Levy B. Clinical impact of rapid in vitro susceptibility testing and bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1757–1762. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1757-1762.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Henry N. K., McLimans C. A., Wright A. J., Thompson R. L., Wilson W. R., Washington J. A., 2nd Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):864–869. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.864-869.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ispahani P., Pearson N. J., Donald F. E. Blood cultures: eight years' experience of a conventional in-house system and trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities. Med Lab Sci. 1989 Oct;46(4):295–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li J., Plorde J. J., Carlson L. G. Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2829–2831. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2829-2831.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mermel L. A., Maki D. G. Detection of bacteremia in adults: consequences of culturing an inadequate volume of blood. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Aug 15;119(4):270–272. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-4-199308150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morris A. J., Wilson M. L., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Rationale for selective use of anaerobic blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2110–2113. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2110-2113.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mozes B., Milatiner D., Block C., Blumstein Z., Halkin H. Inconsistency of a model aimed at predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Sep;46(9):1035–1040. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90171-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray P. R., Traynor P., Hopson D. Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1462–1468. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1462-1468.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nolte F. S., Williams J. M., Jerris R. C., Morello J. A., Leitch C. D., Matushek S., Schwabe L. D., Dorigan F., Kocka F. E. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240). J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):552–557. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.552-557.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Porter R. C., Lo P., Low D. E., Simor A. E., McGeer A., Scriver S., Moore T. C., Goldman C., Skulnick M. Utilization review of the use of BACTEC PLUS high-volume blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2794–2795. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2794-2795.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Robinson A. Rationale for cost-effective laboratory medicine. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Apr;7(2):185–199. doi: 10.1128/cmr.7.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stevens C. M., Swaine D., Butler C., Carr A. H., Weightman A., Catchpole C. R., Healing D. E., Elliott T. S. Development of o.a.s.i.s., a new automated blood culture system in which detection is based on measurement of bottle headspace pressure changes. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1750–1756. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1750-1756.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strand C. L., Wajsbort R. R., Sturmann K. Effect of iodophor vs iodine tincture skin preparation on blood culture contamination rate. JAMA. 1993 Feb 24;269(8):1004–1006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Washington J. A., 2nd, Ilstrup D. M. Blood cultures: issues and controversies. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Sep-Oct;8(5):792–802. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.5.792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Washington J. A. An international multicenter study of blood culture practices. The International Collaborative Blood Culture Study Group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;11(12):1115–1128. doi: 10.1007/BF01961130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Washington J. A. Blood cultures: an overview. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;8(9):803–806. doi: 10.1007/BF02185852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yagupsky P., Nolte F. S. Quantitative aspects of septicemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):269–279. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.3.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zwadyk P., Jr, Pierson C. L., Young C. Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1273–1279. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1273-1279.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES