Abstract
Blood cultures collected in BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottles and BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F bottles were monitored for 5 days by BACTEC 9240 and subsequent terminal subcultures. Of the 13,471 bottles subcultured, 11.0% (1,477 of 13,471) were culture positive. Of these, 94.0% (1,388 of 1,477) were detected by BACTEC 9240; the additional 6.0% (89 of 1,477) were considered to be false negatives by BACTEC 9240 since they were detected by terminal subculture only. The false-negative bottles consisted of 17 BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and 72 BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F bottles, accounting for 2.2 (17 of 786) and 10.4% (72 of 691) of the total positive aerobic and anaerobic bottles, respectively. The positive blood culture bottles most frequently not detected by BACTEC 9240 grew Pseudomonas spp. (24), Staphylococcus spp. (21), and yeasts (24). Of the 86 blood cultures represented by the 89 false-negative bottles, 41 would not have been identified as positive since the other bottle in the blood culture set was either a false negative or a true negative. In general, terminal subcultures of false-negative BACTEC bottles had heavy growth, indicating that BACTEC Plus media were able to support the growth of microorganisms, but the BACTEC 9240 instrument was unable to detect this growth.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (208.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Appelbaum P. C., Beckwith D. G., Dipersio J. R., Dyke J. W., Salventi J. F., Stone L. L. Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):48–51. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.48-51.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilstrup D. M. Statistical methods in microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jul;3(3):219–226. doi: 10.1128/cmr.3.3.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koontz F. P., Flint K. K., Reynolds J. K., Allen S. D. Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR BACTEC PLUS system and the standard (5 ml) NR BACTEC system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Mar-Apr;14(2):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90044-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray P. R., Traynor P., Hopson D. Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1462–1468. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1462-1468.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolte F. S., Williams J. M., Jerris R. C., Morello J. A., Leitch C. D., Matushek S., Schwabe L. D., Dorigan F., Kocka F. E. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240). J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):552–557. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.552-557.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tarrand J. J., Guillot C., Wenglar M., Jackson J., Lajeunesse J. D., Rolston K. V. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2245–2249. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2245-2249.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weinstein M. P., Mirrett S., Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879–882. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson M. L., Harrell L. J., Mirrett S., Weinstein M. P., Stratton C. W., Reller L. B. Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):63–66. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.63-66.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]