Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Jun;33(6):1435–1441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1435-1441.1995

Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens.

J S Shah 1, J Liu 1, D Buxton 1, A Hendricks 1, L Robinson 1, G Radcliffe 1, W King 1, D Lane 1, D M Olive 1, J D Klinger 1
PMCID: PMC228191  PMID: 7650163

Abstract

We report the results of a study conducted to evaluate the performance of manual Q-Beta replicase-amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex assay compared with that of culture for detecting M. tuberculosis directly from digested sputum pellets. A total of 261 specimens submitted to three tuberculosis testing laboratories were analyzed. Culture and acid-fast bacillus smear results were provided by the tuberculosis testing laboratories. Of these 261 specimens, 34 (13% prevalence rate) were positive for M. tuberculosis by culture. The samples were digested and decontaminated by the testing laboratories by using their standard digestion and decontamination procedures. An aliquot of the digested and decontaminated pellet was sent to GENE-TRAK. The digested and decontaminated pellet was neutralized by washing it with 0.067 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and the bacteria present in the washed pellet were heat inactivated at 100 degrees C for 15 min. The samples were combined with sample processing buffer containing GuSCN and were treated for 6 min in the GENE-TRAK Sample Processing Instrument to release the nucleic acids. The release rRNA was analyzed in a manual Q-Beta replicase assay format which incorporates elements of sandwich hybridization, reversible target capture, and Q-beta replicase signal amplification technologies. In comparison with culture, the overall assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.1 and 96.5%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 80.5%, and the negative predictive value was 99.5%. After analysis of discrepant results, the assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.3 and 97.8, respectively, and the prevalence rate was 14%. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 87.8 and 99.5%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (304.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barns S. M., Lane D. J., Sogin M. L., Bibeau C., Weisburg W. G. Evolutionary relationships among pathogenic Candida species and relatives. J Bacteriol. 1991 Apr;173(7):2250–2255. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.7.2250-2255.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodmer T., Gurtner A., Schopfer K., Matter L. Screening of respiratory tract specimens for the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by using the Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1483–1487. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1483-1487.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brisson-Noël A., Gicquel B., Lecossier D., Lévy-Frébault V., Nassif X., Hance A. J. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples. Lancet. 1989 Nov 4;2(8671):1069–1071. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler W. R., Kilburn J. O. Identification of major slowly growing pathogenic mycobacteria and Mycobacterium gordonae by high-performance liquid chromatography of their mycolic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jan;26(1):50–53. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.1.50-53.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarridge J. E., 3rd, Shawar R. M., Shinnick T. M., Plikaytis B. B. Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2049–2056. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2049-2056.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cousins D. V., Wilton S. D., Francis B. R., Gow B. L. Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):255–258. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.255-258.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Wit D., Steyn L., Shoemaker S., Sogin M. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2437–2441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2437-2441.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenach K. D., Cave M. D., Bates J. H., Crawford J. T. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 1990 May;161(5):977–981. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.5.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenach K. D., Sifford M. D., Cave M. D., Bates J. H., Crawford J. T. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1160–1163. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellner P. D., Kiehn T. E., Cammarata R., Hosmer M. Rapid detection and identification of pathogenic mycobacteria by combining radiometric and nucleic acid probe methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1349–1352. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1349-1352.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Forbes B. A., Hicks K. E. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens in a clinical laboratory by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1688–1694. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1688-1694.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hermans P. W., van Soolingen D., Dale J. W., Schuitema A. R., McAdam R. A., Catty D., van Embden J. D. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):2051–2058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.2051-2058.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holland S. M., Hudson A. P., Bobo L., Whittum-Hudson J. A., Viscidi R. P., Quinn T. C., Taylor H. R. Demonstration of chlamydial RNA and DNA during a culture-negative state. Infect Immun. 1992 May;60(5):2040–2047. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.5.2040-2047.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunsaker W. R., Badri H., Lombardo M., Collins M. L. Nucleic acid hybridization assays employing dA-tailed capture probes. II. Advanced multiple capture methods. Anal Biochem. 1989 Sep;181(2):360–370. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90256-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jonas V., Alden M. J., Curry J. I., Kamisango K., Knott C. A., Lankford R., Wolfe J. M., Moore D. F. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2410–2416. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2410-2416.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kramer F. R., Lizardi P. M. Replicatable RNA reporters. Nature. 1989 Jun 1;339(6223):401–402. doi: 10.1038/339401a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller N., Hernandez S. G., Cleary T. J. Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):393–397. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.393-397.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morrissey D. V., Lombardo M., Eldredge J. K., Kearney K. R., Groody E. P., Collins M. L. Nucleic acid hybridization assays employing dA-tailed capture probes. I. Multiple capture methods. Anal Biochem. 1989 Sep;181(2):345–359. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90255-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nolte F. S., Metchock B., McGowan J. E., Jr, Edwards A., Okwumabua O., Thurmond C., Mitchell P. S., Plikaytis B., Shinnick T. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by polymerase chain reaction and DNA hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1777–1782. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1777-1782.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noordhoek G. T., Kolk A. H., Bjune G., Catty D., Dale J. W., Fine P. E., Godfrey-Faussett P., Cho S. N., Shinnick T., Svenson S. B. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):277–284. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.277-284.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peterson E. M., Lu R., Floyd C., Nakasone A., Friedly G., de la Maza L. M. Direct identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium intracellulare from amplified primary cultures in BACTEC media using DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1543–1547. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1543-1547.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pfyffer G. E., Kissling P., Wirth R., Weber R. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by a target-amplified test system. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Apr;32(4):918–923. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.918-923.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ranki M., Palva A., Virtanen M., Laaksonen M., Söderlund H. Sandwich hybridization as a convenient method for the detection of nucleic acids in crude samples. Gene. 1983 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):77–85. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shah J. S., Liu J., Buxton D., Stone B., Nietupski R., Olive D. M., King W., Klinger J. D. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from spiked human sputum by Q-beta replicase-amplified assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):322–328. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.322-328.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shah J. S., Liu J., Smith J., Popoff S., Radcliffe G., O'Brien W. J., Serpe G., Olive D. M., King W. Novel, ultrasensitive, Q-beta replicase-amplified hybridization assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2718–2724. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2718-2724.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sjöbring U., Mecklenburg M., Andersen A. B., Miörner H. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Oct;28(10):2200–2204. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.10.2200-2204.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Soini H., Skurnik M., Liippo K., Tala E., Viljanen M. K. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of a segment of the gene coding for the 32-kilodalton protein. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2025–2028. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2025-2028.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sudre P., ten Dam G., Kochi A. Tuberculosis: a global overview of the situation today. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(2):149–159. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Victor T., du Toit R., van Helden P. D. Purification of sputum samples through sucrose improves detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1514–1517. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1514-1517.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Whittier P. S., Westfall K., Setterquist S., Hopfer R. L. Evaluation of the Septi-Chek AFB system in the recovery of mycobacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Oct;11(10):915–918. doi: 10.1007/BF01962373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES