Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Jun;33(6):1554–1557. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1554-1557.1995

Comparison of field inversion gel electrophoresis with contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis as a typing method for Enterococcus faecium.

M Green 1, K Barbadora 1, S Donabedian 1, M J Zervos 1
PMCID: PMC228214  PMID: 7650185

Abstract

Direct comparisons between contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) electrophoresis and field inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE) to determine the epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant enterococci have not been previously published. Fifty non-beta-lactamase-producing, ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates and 10 vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains collected from multiple centers were analyzed in a blinded fashion by CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE after digestion with SmaI. Isolates were considered clonally related if there was a difference of three of fewer bands between electrophoretic patterns. Agreement between CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE was seen for 12 of 13 identified groups of ampicillin-resistant E. faecium and 7 of 7 groups of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. The lone discordance was accounted for by a fourth band difference between two strains recognized near 350 kb by CHEF electrophoresis but not by FIGE, placing them into different clonal groups. Better band separation was noted in the 50- to 200-kb range for FIGE, while CHEF electrophoresis revealed better resolution over 250 kb more reliably, including detection of some bands not seen on FIGE. Molecular epidemiologic investigations of E. faecium by either technique should provide comparable results.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (591.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Back N. A., Linnemann C. C., Jr, Pfaller M. A., Staneck J. L., Morthland V. Recurrent epidemics caused by a single strain of erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The importance of molecular epidemiology. JAMA. 1993 Sep 15;270(11):1329–1333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chow J. W., Kuritza A., Shlaes D. M., Green M., Sahm D. F., Zervos M. J. Clonal spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium between patients in three hospitals in two states. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1609–1611. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1609-1611.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donabedian S. M., Chow J. W., Boyce J. M., McCabe R. E., Markowitz S. M., Coudron P. E., Kuritza A., Pierson C. L., Zervos M. J. Molecular typing of ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Enterococcus faecium isolates from diverse geographic areas. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2757–2761. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2757-2761.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Facklam R. R., Collins M. D. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):731–734. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.4.731-734.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goering R. V. Molecular epidemiology of nosocomial infection: analysis of chromosomal restriction fragment patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;14(10):595–600. doi: 10.1086/646645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Green M., Barbadora K., Wadowsky R. M. Simple test of synergy between ampicillin and vancomycin for resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2837–2839. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2837-2839.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lefevre J. C., Faucon G., Sicard A. M., Gasc A. M. DNA fingerprinting of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2724–2728. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2724-2728.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Murray B. E., Singh K. V., Heath J. D., Sharma B. R., Weinstock G. M. Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):2059–2063. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.2059-2063.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray B. E., Singh K. V., Markowitz S. M., Lopardo H. A., Patterson J. E., Zervos M. J., Rubeglio E., Eliopoulos G. M., Rice L. B., Goldstein F. W. Evidence for clonal spread of a single strain of beta-lactamase-producing Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis to six hospitals in five states. J Infect Dis. 1991 Apr;163(4):780–785. doi: 10.1093/infdis/163.4.780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pyle L. E., Finch L. R. Preparation and FIGE separation of infrequent restriction fragments from Mycoplasma mycoides DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Mar 25;16(5):2263–2268. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.5.2263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. de Moissac Y. R., Ronald S. L., Peppler M. S. Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for epidemiological study of Bordetella pertussis in a whooping cough outbreak. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):398–402. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.398-402.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES