Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Jul;33(7):1787–1790. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1787-1790.1995

Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems.

W C Hellinger 1, J J Cawley 1, S Alvarez 1, S F Hogan 1, W S Harmsen 1, D M Ilstrup 1, F R Cockerill 3rd 1
PMCID: PMC228270  PMID: 7665647

Abstract

The performance characteristics of the Isolator (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, N.J.) and the BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika Corporation, Durham, N.C.) aerobic blood culture systems were compared for 6,009 blood culture sets obtained from patients with suspected bloodstream infections. The BacT/Alert aerobic bottle [BTA(O2)] was continuously agitated while it was incubated in 5% CO2 at 36 degrees C; culture plates prepared from the Isolator tube [I(O2)] were incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 degrees C. From 394 blood cultures, 416 clinically significant isolates of bacteria and yeasts were recovered. The overall yields for BTA(O2) and I(O2) were not significantly different (319 versus 336; P = 0.20). I(O2) recovered significantly more staphylococcus (P < 0.05) and yeast isolates (P < 0.01). BTA(O2) recovered significantly more aerobic and facultatively anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (P < 0.05). In blood culture sets which produced growth of the same organisms in both the BTA(O2) and I(O2) systems, the BTA(O2) system detected growth sooner, but more rapid identification was possible with the I(O2) system by virtue of earlier isolation of colonies on solid media.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (167.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Henry N. K., Grewell C. M., Van Grevenhof P. E., Ilstrup D. M., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of lysis-centrifugation with a biphasic blood culture medium for the recovery of aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):413–416. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.413-416.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kellogg J. A., Bankert D. A., Manzella J. P., Parsey K. S., Scott S. L., Cavanaugh S. H. Clinical comparison of isolator and thiol broth with ESP aerobic and anaerobic bottles for recovery of pathogens from blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2050–2055. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2050-2055.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Basille B. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical comparison of two lysis-based blood culture systems, isolator and Septi-Chek Release, for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2114–2117. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2114-2117.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirkley B. A., Easley K. A., Washington J. A. Controlled clinical evaluation of Isolator and ESP aerobic blood culture systems for detection of bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jun;32(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.6.1547-1549.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wilson M. L., Weinstein M. P., Reimer L. G., Mirrett S., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Feb;30(2):323–329. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.323-329.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zwadyk P., Jr, Pierson C. L., Young C. Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1273–1279. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1273-1279.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES