Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Jul;33(7):1966–1967. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1966-1967.1995

Errors arising from incorrect orientation of E test strips.

J M Hamilton-Miller 1, S Shah 1, T S Yam 1
PMCID: PMC228315  PMID: 7665686

Abstract

Major errors arise if E test strips are placed upside down. Asymmetric zones, or no zone at all, may result. MICs indicated by upside-down tests were almost always considerably higher than true values. This situation differs markedly from that for conventional testing, where orientation of disks is not important.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (599.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown D. F., Brown L. Evaluation of the E test, a novel method of quantifying antimicrobial activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27(2):185–190. doi: 10.1093/jac/27.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller L. A., Rittenhouse S. F., Utrup L. J., Poupard J. A. Comparison of three methods for determination of a single MIC of an antimicrobial agent. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1373–1375. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1373-1375.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES