Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Aug;33(8):2179–2182. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2179-2182.1995

Detection of the Staphylococcal mecA gene by chemiluminescent DNA hybridization.

C P Kolbert 1, J E Connolly 1, M J Lee 1, D H Persing 1
PMCID: PMC228360  PMID: 7559973

Abstract

A new solution-phase DNA hybridization capture assay for the rapid detection of the mecA gene in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus was compared with multiplex PCR and disk diffusion methods. The assay uses a DNA capture probe immobilized on paramagnetic particles and a second DNA probe labeled with an acridinium ester. Bacteria from 24-h cultures are lysed, and the lysates are hybridized with the DNA probes. After magnetic separation to remove unhybridized labeled probe, the mecA gene is detected by the chemiluminescence of the hybridized probe. Four hundred consecutive staphylococcal isolates were assayed, including 147 S. aureus and 253 coagulase-negative Staphylococcus isolates. Among the S. aureus isolates, 14 of 147 were MecA+ by both the hybridization capture assay and PCR; 133 of 147 were MecA negative by both assays (positive and negative predictive values, 100%). Comparison of disk diffusion results with those obtained by genotypic methods indicated that 14 of 147 S. aureus isolates judged to be resistant were positive by both methods; 119 of 147 were Oxs and negative by both genotypic methods (positive and negative predictive values, 50 and 100%, respectively). The remaining 14 S. aureus isolates were MecA- Oxr; among these, 13 were beta-lactamase hyperproducers. For coagulase-negative staphylococci, 130 of 253 were MecA+ by the hybridization capture assay; 129 of 130 of these isolates were positive by PCR (positive and negative predictive values, 99.2 and 100%, respectively). Comparison with the disk diffusion assay showed that 128 of the coagulase-negative MecA+ isolates were Oxr; 111 of 253 were MecA- and Oxs (positive and negative predictive values, 90.8 and 99.1%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (311.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annear D. I. The effect of temperature on resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibioics. Med J Aust. 1968 Mar 16;1(11):444–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer G. L. Antimicrobial susceptibility and selection of resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates recovered from patients with infections of indwelling foreign devices. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):353–359. doi: 10.1128/aac.14.3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer G. L., Pennell E. Detection of methicillin resistance in staphylococci by using a DNA probe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1720–1724. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BARBER M. NATURALLY OCCURING METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 May;35:183–190. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-2-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barberis-Maino L., Berger-Bächi B., Weber H., Beck W. D., Kayser F. H. IS431, a staphylococcal insertion sequence-like element related to IS26 from Proteus vulgaris. Gene. 1987;59(1):107–113. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90271-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown D. F., Reynolds P. E. Intrinsic resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. FEBS Lett. 1980 Dec 29;122(2):275–278. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80455-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brumfitt W., Hamilton-Miller J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 1989 May 4;320(18):1188–1196. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905043201806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chambers H. F., Archer G., Matsuhashi M. Low-level methicillin resistance in strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Apr;33(4):424–428. doi: 10.1128/aac.33.4.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chambers H. F. Coagulase-negative staphylococci resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics in vivo produce penicillin-binding protein 2a. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Dec;31(12):1919–1924. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.12.1919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geha D. J., Uhl J. R., Gustaferro C. A., Persing D. H. Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jul;32(7):1768–1772. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.7.1768-1772.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Georgopapadakou N. H., Smith S. A., Bonner D. P. Penicillin-binding proteins in a Staphylococcus aureus strain resistant to specific beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jul;22(1):172–175. doi: 10.1128/aac.22.1.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haley R. W., Hightower A. W., Khabbaz R. F., Thornsberry C., Martone W. J., Allen J. R., Hughes J. M. The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in United States hospitals. Possible role of the house staff-patient transfer circuit. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Sep;97(3):297–308. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-97-3-297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartman B. J., Tomasz A. Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jan;29(1):85–92. doi: 10.1128/aac.29.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartman B. J., Tomasz A. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1984 May;158(2):513–516. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.2.513-516.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones R. N., Edson D. C. Interlaboratory performance of disk agar diffusion and dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests, 1979-1981. A summary of the microbiology portion of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys. Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4 Suppl):651–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karchmer A. W., Archer G. L., Dismukes W. E. Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Apr;98(4):447–455. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-4-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuhl S. A., Pattee P. A., Baldwin J. N. Chromosomal map location of the methicillin resistance determinant in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1978 Aug;135(2):460–465. doi: 10.1128/jb.135.2.460-465.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ligozzi M., Rossolini G. M., Tonin E. A., Fontana R. Nonradioactive DNA probe for detection of gene for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Mar;35(3):575–578. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Montanari M. P., Tonin E., Biavasco F., Varaldo P. E. Further characterization of borderline methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and analysis of penicillin-binding proteins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 May;34(5):911–913. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.5.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Myers J. P., Linnemann C. C., Jr Bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 1982 Apr;145(4):532–536. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.4.532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pierre J., Williamson R., Bornet M., Gutmann L. Presence of an additional penicillin-binding protein in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus simulans with a low affinity for methicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Sep;34(9):1691–1694. doi: 10.1128/aac.34.9.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SUTHERLAND R., ROLINSON G. N. CHARACTERISTICS OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. J Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;87:887–899. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.4.887-899.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sabath L. D., Wallace S. J. The problems of drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Jun 11;182:258–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb30662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tokue Y., Shoji S., Satoh K., Watanabe A., Motomiya M. Comparison of a polymerase chain reaction assay and a conventional microbiologic method for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Jan;36(1):6–9. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tomasz A., Nachman S., Leaf H. Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jan;35(1):124–129. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.1.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wada A., Katayama Y., Hiramatsu K., Yokota T. Southern hybridization analysis of the mecA deletion from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991 May 15;176(3):1319–1325. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)90430-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES