Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Sep;33(9):2316–2323. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2316-2323.1995

Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women.

J R Johnson 1, F S Tiu 1, W E Stamm 1
PMCID: PMC228402  PMID: 7494020

Abstract

Despite its theoretical advantages, direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (DST) of urine specimens remains controversial largely because of concerns regarding its accuracy, particularly with mixed cultures. To evaluate the performance of DST in the setting of acute urinary tract infection (UTI), we performed DST using 25 traditional and contemporary antimicrobial agents on urine specimens from 162 women with suspected acute uncomplicated UTI, and compared these results with the results of standardized disk diffusion susceptibility tests done on the same specimens. Direct tests were interpretable for 129 specimens, i.e., 80% of all specimens and 85% of the 152 specimens that met the culture criteria for UTI. Of the 2,983 individual comparisons between the direct and standard tests, 0.8% represented very major errors, 0.6% represented major errors, 3.1% represented minor errors, and 95.5% were in agreement. Errors were more common in association with older antimicrobial agents and agents with a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, non-Escherichia coli strains, low urine bacterial concentrations, sparse or mixed growth in the direct test, and the presence of multiple significant organisms in urine. The urine leukocyte concentration was > or = 15/mm3 in all subjects and did not differentiate between specimens that gave an interpretable direct test and those that did not. Calculation of the sensitivity of DST in identifying antimicrobial resistance supplemented conventional error rate analysis. We conclude that when used selectively and interpreted carefully, DST of urine specimens offers an efficient, rapid, and accurate method for antimicrobial susceptibility determination for acute UTI, particularly when the urine bacterial concentration is > 10(5) CFU/ml.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (278.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arav-Boger R., Leibovici L., Danon Y. L. Urinary tract infections with low and high colony counts in young women. Spontaneous remission and single-dose vs multiple-day treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Feb 14;154(3):300–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry A. L., Joyce L. J., Adams A. P., Benner E. J. Rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility for urgent clinical situations. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973 May;59(5):693–699. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/59.5.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer A. W., Kirby W. M., Sherris J. C., Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966 Apr;45(4):493–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blue A. P., Gordon D. L. Is primary sensitivity testing on urine samples valid? Pathology. 1991 Apr;23(2):149–152. doi: 10.3109/00313029109060815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boyle V. J., Fancher M. E., Ross R. W., Jr Rapid, modified Kirby-Bauer susceptibility test with single, high-concentration antimicrobial disks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):418–424. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.3.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campo L., Mylotte J. M. Use of microbiology reports by physicians in prescribing antimicrobial agents. Am J Med Sci. 1988 Dec;296(6):392–398. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198812000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyle M. B., McGonagle L. A., Plorde J. J., Clausen C. R., Schoenknecht F. D. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):473–477. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.473-477.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doern G. V. Clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1985 Nov;3(6 Suppl):59S–64S. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(85)90054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dornbusch K., Lindeberg B., Nord C. E., Thunell S. Bacteriuria diagnosis and antibiotic susceptibility testing in a group practice by dipslide techniques. Chemotherapy. 1979;25(4):227–232. doi: 10.1159/000237844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dornbusch K., Nord C. E., Olsson B., Thunell S. Antibacterial susceptibility testing by the dip-slide technique: a methodological evaluation. Chemotherapy. 1976;22(3-4):190–202. doi: 10.1159/000221926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doyle P. W., Haldane D. J., Ngui-Yen J. H., Smith J. A. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of urines positive in the MS-2 urine screening program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3):267–271. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90107-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dupeyron C. M., Guillemin G. A., Leluan G. J. Rapid diagnosis of gram negative urinary infections: identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 24 hours. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Feb;39(2):208–211. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.2.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GOULD J. C. The laboratory control of antibiotic therapy. Br Med Bull. 1960 Jan;16:29–34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heinze P. A., Thrupp L. D., Anselmo C. R. A rapid (4--6-hour) urine-culture system for direct identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Feb;71(2):177–183. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.2.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hollick G. E., Washington J. A., 2nd Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 May;9(5):804–809. doi: 10.1128/aac.9.5.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hooton T. M., Winter C., Tiu F., Stamm W. E. Randomized comparative trial and cost analysis of 3-day antimicrobial regimens for treatment of acute cystitis in women. JAMA. 1995 Jan 4;273(1):41–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenkins R. D., Hale D. C., Matsen J. M. Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Mar;11(3):220–225. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.220-225.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson J. R., Stamm W. E. Urinary tract infections in women: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Dec 1;111(11):906–917. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-11-906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamm W., Wenger A., Bille J. Evaluation of the Cobas-Bact system for direct and rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae from positive urine specimens. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1989 Sep;271(3):272–280. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(89)80025-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kluge R. M. Accuracy of Kirby-Bauer susceptibility tests read at 4, 8, and 12 hours of incubation: comparison with readings at 18 to 20 hours. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Aug;8(2):139–145. doi: 10.1128/aac.8.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kunin C. M. Urinary tract infections in females. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kunin C. M., White L. V., Hua T. H. A reassessment of the importance of "low-count" bacteriuria in young women with acute urinary symptoms. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 15;119(6):454–460. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Källenius G., Dornbusch K., Hallander H. O., Jakobsson K. Comparison of direct and standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing in bacteriuria. Chemotherapy. 1981;27(2):99–105. doi: 10.1159/000237963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Latham R. H., Wong E. S., Larson A., Coyle M., Stamm W. E. Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection in ambulatory women. JAMA. 1985 Dec 20;254(23):3333–3336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liberman D. F., Robertson R. G. Evaluation of a rapid Bauer-Kirby antibiotic susceptibility determination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Mar;7(3):250–255. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.3.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Melia J. L., Cook E. L., White R. S. Rapid antibiotic sensitivity testing utilizing zone size methodology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1971 Jul;56(1):59–63. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/56.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oakes A. R., Badger R., Grove D. I. Comparison of direct and standardized testing of infected urine for antimicrobial susceptibilities by disk diffusion. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):40–45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.40-45.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perez J. R., Gillenwater J. Y. Clinical evaluation of testing immediate antibiotic disk sensitivities in bacteriuria. J Urol. 1973 Oct;110(4):452–456. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60248-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rodoman V. E., Korotaev A. L., Laberko L. A., Zarma A. A., Rodoman G. V. Metod opredeleniia chuvstvitel'nosti mikroflory mochi k antibakterial'nym preparatam. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 1989 Mar-Apr;(2):13–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scully P. G., O'Shea B., Flanagan K. P., Falkiner F. R. Urinary tract infection in general practice: direct antibiotic sensitivity testing as a potential diagnostic method. Ir J Med Sci. 1990 Apr;159(4):98–100. doi: 10.1007/BF02937439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shahidi A., Ellner P. D. Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Nov;18(5):766–770. doi: 10.1128/am.18.5.766-770.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stamm W. E., Counts G. W., Running K. R., Fihn S., Turck M., Holmes K. K. Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 19;307(8):463–468. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198208193070802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stamm W. E., Hooton T. M. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 28;329(18):1328–1334. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199310283291808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Szczepura A. K. Efficiency in pathology laboratories: a survey of operations management in NHS bacteriology. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):531–543. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90211-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thornsberry C., Gavan T. L., Sherris J. C., Balows A., Matsen J. M., Sabath L. D., Schoenknecht F., Thrupp L. D., Washington J. A., 2nd Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):466–480. doi: 10.1128/aac.7.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tilton R. E., Tilton R. C. Automated direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microscopically screened urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Feb;11(2):157–161. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.2.157-161.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Todd J. K. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the office laboratory. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1983 Nov-Dec;2(6):481–486. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198311000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Trenholme G. M., Kaplan R. L., Karakusis P. H., Stine T., Fuhrer J., Landau W., Levin S. Clinical impact of rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial blood culture isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1342–1345. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1342-1345.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Waterworth P. M., Del Piano M. Dependability of sensitivity tests in primary culture. J Clin Pathol. 1976 Mar;29(3):179–184. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.3.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES