Abstract
We evaluated the reproducibility with which technologists perform and interpret the E test (AB Biodisk, North America, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.) for determining the susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone. Four technologists prepared E test assays to test 124 isolates of S. pneumoniae. Each technologist then interpreted the results of the E test blinded to the interpretation of the other technologists. In addition, E test results were compared with the reference method of broth microdilution. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were assessed by use of the kappa statistic. Interpretation of the E test and broth microdilution results showed substantial to excellent agreement, with kappa values ranging from 0.878 to 0.987. Compared with broth microdilution, no very major errors and only four major errors were made with the E test. Most minor errors with penicillin and ceftriaxone occurred for isolates with intermediate or high-level resistance, whereas for cefotaxime the minor errors were more evenly distributed between susceptible and intermediate resistance and between intermediate and high-level resistance. These results indicate that there is good agreement between technologists for the interpretation of the E test when testing the susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone and that the results of the E test agree with those of broth microdilution.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (221.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Appelbaum P. C., Bhamjee A., Scragg J. N., Hallett A. F., Bowen A. J., Cooper R. C. Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to penicillin and chloramphenicol. Lancet. 1977 Nov 12;2(8046):995–997. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedland I. R., McCracken G. H., Jr Management of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 11;331(6):377–382. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408113310607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs M. R., Koornhof H. J., Robins-Browne R. M., Stevenson C. M., Vermaak Z. A., Freiman I., Miller G. B., Witcomb M. A., Isaäcson M., Ward J. I. Emergence of multiply resistant pneumococci. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 5;299(14):735–740. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810052991402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- John C. C. Treatment failure with use of a third-generation cephalosporin for penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis: case report and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Feb;18(2):188–193. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen J. H., Ferraro M. J., McElmeel M. L., Spargo J., Swenson J. M., Tenover F. C. Detection of penicillin and extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical isolates by use of the E test. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):159–163. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.1.159-163.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jorgensen J. H., Swenson J. M., Tenover F. C., Ferraro M. J., Hindler J. A., Murray P. R. Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for broth microdilution and disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2448–2459. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2448-2459.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiska D. L., Kerr A., Jones M. C., Chazotte N. N., Eskridge B., Miller S., Jordan M., Sheaffer C., Gilligan P. H. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility methods for detection of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jan;33(1):229–232. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.229-232.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klugman K. P. Management of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Aug;34(2):191–193. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramer M. S., Feinstein A. R. Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Jan;29(1):111–123. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krisher K. K., Linscott A. Comparison of three commercial MIC systems, E test, fastidious antimicrobial susceptibility panel, and FOX fastidious panel, for confirmation of penicillin and cephalosporin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Sep;32(9):2242–2245. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2242-2245.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lonks J. R., Durkin M. R., Meyerhoff A. N., Medeiros A. A. Meningitis due to ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 30;332(13):893–894. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503303321317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macias E. A., Mason E. O., Jr, Ocera H. Y., LaRocco M. T. Comparison of E test with standard broth microdilution for determining antibiotic susceptibilities of penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):430–432. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.430-432.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mazzulli T., Simor A. E., Low D. E. Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1506–1508. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1506-1508.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Privitera G. Penicillin resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae in Europe. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Jul;19(3):157–161. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90059-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swenson J. M., Hill B. C., Thornsberry C. Screening pneumococci for penicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):749–752. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.749-752.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward J. I., Moellering R. C., Jr Susceptibility of pneumococci to 14 beta-lactam agents: comparison of strains resistant, intermediate-resistant, and susceptible to penicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 Aug;20(2):204–207. doi: 10.1128/aac.20.2.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]