Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Sep;33(9):2388–2391. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2388-2391.1995

Evaluation of AnaeroGen system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.

P H Miller 1, L S Wiggs 1, J M Miller 1
PMCID: PMC228418  PMID: 7494033

Abstract

The Oxoid AnaeroGen system was compared with the BBL GasPak for the production of an anaerobic atmosphere and was evaluated for its ability to support the growth of 135 clinically significant anaerobic bacteria. An anaerobe chamber was used as the "gold standard" for supporting the growth of anaerobes. The AnaeroGen requires no catalyst, produces no hydrogen, requires no water, and reduces preparation time to a minimum. The water-activated BBL GasPak generates hydrogen. For 132 of the 135 strains tested, better initial growth at 48 h was noted for the jar methods than for the anaerobe chamber. At 72 h, 113 of the 135 strains showed equal growth, and at 7 days, only marginal differences in growth patterns were noted. The AnaeroGen never failed to reduce the anaerobic indicator, while the BBL GasPak occasionally failed to do so. The AnaeroGen performed at least as well as, and sometimes better than, the established methods. The AnaeroGen is a good alternative for use in anaerobic jars.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (208.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Han Y. H., Smibert R. M., Krieg N. R. Wolinella recta, Wolinella curva, Bacteroides ureolyticus, and Bacteroides gracilis are microaerophiles, not anaerobes. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991 Apr;41(2):218–222. doi: 10.1099/00207713-41-2-218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Vandamme P., Daneshvar M. I., Dewhirst F. E., Paster B. J., Kersters K., Goossens H., Moss C. W. Chemotaxonomic analyses of Bacteroides gracilis and Bacteroides ureolyticus and reclassification of B. gracilis as Campylobacter gracilis comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;45(1):145–152. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-1-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vandamme P., Falsen E., Rossau R., Hoste B., Segers P., Tytgat R., De Ley J. Revision of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Wolinella taxonomy: emendation of generic descriptions and proposal of Arcobacter gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;41(1):88–103. doi: 10.1099/00207713-41-1-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES