Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Oct;33(10):2525–2529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2525-2529.1995

Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections.

J K Pohlman 1, B A Kirkley 1, K A Easley 1, J A Washington 1
PMCID: PMC228522  PMID: 8567877

Abstract

A controlled clinical comparison was carried out with the BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle and the Isolator system with adult patients suspected of having bloodstream infections. A total of 10,500 paired specimens were collected, of which 1,122 from 520 patients were positive. There were 68 false-positive BACTEC bottles; 259 positive cultures that were excluded from analysis because the bottle, the Isolator, or both failed to meet the minimum volume criterion of 8 ml of blood; and 207 positive cultures that were excluded because the isolates were found to be clinically insignificant or of indeterminate clinical significance on the basis of patient assessment. A total of 656 positive cultures from 258 patients formed the basis of the analysis. Significantly more Staphylococcus aureus isolates (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (P = 0.03), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.03), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (P = 0.04) were recovered from the resin bottle, and there was no category of organism that was recovered significantly more frequently from the Isolator system. With patients receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and gram-negative bacilli were recovered significantly more frequently from the resin bottle. No significant differences between systems were found with cultures from patients not receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture. Only 12 clinically significant organisms were recovered from the bottle on terminal subcultures, and only 1 of these had not been previously isolated from another blood culture set (10 of the 12) or from the companion Isolator (1 of 12).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (201.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brannon P., Kiehn T. E. Clinical comparison of lysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):886–887. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.886-887.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dyster L. M., Abbott L., Bryz-Gornia V., Poiesz B. J., Papsidero L. D. Microplate-based DNA hybridization assays for detection of human retroviral gene sequences. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):547–550. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.547-550.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Garner J. S., Jarvis W. R., Emori T. G., Horan T. C., Hughes J. M. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):128–140. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henry N. K., McLimans C. A., Wright A. J., Thompson R. L., Wilson W. R., Washington J. A., 2nd Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):864–869. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.5.864-869.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelly M. T., Roberts F. J., Henry D., Geere I., Smith J. A. Clinical comparison of isolator and BACTEC 660 resin media for blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1925–1927. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1925-1927.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nolte F. S., Williams J. M., Jerris R. C., Morello J. A., Leitch C. D., Matushek S., Schwabe L. D., Dorigan F., Kocka F. E. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240). J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Mar;31(3):552–557. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.3.552-557.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheagren J. N. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Potential impact of a new blood culture technique. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Dec;146(12):2323–2324. doi: 10.1001/archinte.146.12.2323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tarrand J. J., Guillot C., Wenglar M., Jackson J., Lajeunesse J. D., Rolston K. V. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2245–2249. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2245-2249.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker R. C., Henry N. K., Washington J. A., 2nd, Thompson R. L. Lysis-centrifugation blood culture technique. Clinical impact in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Dec;146(12):2341–2343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Washington J. A., 2nd, Ilstrup D. M. Blood cultures: issues and controversies. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Sep-Oct;8(5):792–802. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.5.792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilson M. L., Davis T. E., Mirrett S., Reynolds J., Fuller D., Allen S. D., Flint K. K., Koontz F., Reller L. B. Controlled comparison of the BACTEC high-blood-volume fungal medium, BACTEC Plus 26 aerobic blood culture bottle, and 10-milliliter isolator blood culture system for detection of fungemia and bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):865–871. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.865-871.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES