Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Oct;33(10):2582–2586. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2582-2586.1995

Evaluation of Amplicor PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum specimens.

K G Beavis 1, M B Lichty 1, D L Jungkind 1, O Giger 1
PMCID: PMC228532  PMID: 8567886

Abstract

We evaluated the Amplicor PCR assay (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum. A total of 532 specimens from 270 patients were decontaminated and stored at 4 or -75 degrees C until assayed by PCR. This assay used three-step sample preparation, biotinylated primer pairs, AmpErase, and a microtiter format for amplicon capture and detection. Amplicor PCR results were compared with clinical history, culture from a Lowenstein-Jensen slant, and results from the BACTEC TB-460 system. Eighty-seven cultures from 15 patients grew M. tuberculosis; of these, 83 (95%) were positive with the Amplicor PCR test. The false negatives were most likely due to sample variation and inhibitors. Of the 445 specimens from which M. tuberculosis was not isolated, 428 (96%) were negative with the Amplicor PCR test. Of the 17 M. tuberculosis culture-negative, Amplicor-positive specimens, 15 were reclassified as true positives because previous cultures grew M. tuberculosis. Of the 445 specimens which did not grow M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium spp. other than M. tuberculosis were isolated from 150 specimens. Three of these 150 specimens were Amplicor positive; two were from a patient with a history of tuberculosis, and one specimen gave a false-positive result. We do not feel that this represents cross-reactivity, because repeated Amplicor testing of the isolate gave negative results. The microtiter plate has 96 wells. Allowing for six controls, 90 decontaminated specimens can be tested by one technologist in 7.5 h. This PCR assay took 7.5 h to complete and is a sensitive and specific, rapid method for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis from sputum.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (192.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe C., Hirano K., Wada M., Kazumi Y., Takahashi M., Fukasawa Y., Yoshimura T., Miyagi C., Goto S. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3270–3274. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3270-3274.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altamirano M., Kelly M. T., Wong A., Bessuille E. T., Black W. A., Smith J. A. Characterization of a DNA probe for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2173–2176. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2173-2176.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Böddinghaus B., Rogall T., Flohr T., Blöcker H., Böttger E. C. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Aug;28(8):1751–1759. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.8.1751-1759.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarridge J. E., 3rd, Shawar R. M., Shinnick T. M., Plikaytis B. B. Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2049–2056. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2049-2056.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniel T. M. The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: a selective review. J Lab Clin Med. 1990 Sep;116(3):277–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Wit D., Steyn L., Shoemaker S., Sogin M. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Nov;28(11):2437–2441. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.11.2437-2441.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenach K. D., Crawford J. T., Bates J. H. Repetitive DNA sequences as probes for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2240–2245. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2240-2245.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenach K. D., Sifford M. D., Cave M. D., Bates J. H., Crawford J. T. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1160–1163. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hermans P. W., van Soolingen D., Dale J. W., Schuitema A. R., McAdam R. A., Catty D., van Embden J. D. Insertion element IS986 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a useful tool for diagnosis and epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):2051–2058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.2051-2058.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kocagöz T., Yilmaz E., Ozkara S., Kocagöz S., Hayran M., Sachedeva M., Chambers H. F. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples by polymerase chain reaction using a simplified procedure. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1435–1438. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1435-1438.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kolk A. H., Schuitema A. R., Kuijper S., van Leeuwen J., Hermans P. W., van Embden J. D., Hartskeerl R. A. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by using polymerase chain reaction and a nonradioactive detection system. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2567–2575. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2567-2575.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller N., Hernandez S. G., Cleary T. J. Evaluation of Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):393–397. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.393-397.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Narita M., Matsuzono Y., Shibata M., Togashi T. Nested amplification protocol for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Acta Paediatr. 1992 Dec;81(12):997–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1992.tb12162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Narita M., Shibata M., Togashi T., Kobayashi H. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Acta Paediatr. 1992 Feb;81(2):141–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1992.tb12190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Noordhoek G. T., Kolk A. H., Bjune G., Catty D., Dale J. W., Fine P. E., Godfrey-Faussett P., Cho S. N., Shinnick T., Svenson S. B. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):277–284. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.277-284.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pierre C., Lecossier D., Boussougant Y., Bocart D., Joly V., Yeni P., Hance A. J. Use of a reamplification protocol improves sensitivity of detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by amplification of DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Apr;29(4):712–717. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.4.712-717.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Savić B., Sjöbring U., Alugupalli S., Larsson L., Miörner H. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, tuberculostearic acid analysis, and direct microscopy for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum. J Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;166(5):1177–1180. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shawar R. M., el-Zaatari F. A., Nataraj A., Clarridge J. E. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by two-step polymerase chain reaction and nonisotopic hybridization methods. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jan;31(1):61–65. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.1.61-65.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sjöbring U., Mecklenburg M., Andersen A. B., Miörner H. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Oct;28(10):2200–2204. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.10.2200-2204.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Soini H., Skurnik M., Liippo K., Tala E., Viljanen M. K. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of a segment of the gene coding for the 32-kilodalton protein. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2025–2028. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2025-2028.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stahl D. A., Urbance J. W. The division between fast- and slow-growing species corresponds to natural relationships among the mycobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;172(1):116–124. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.116-124.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Victor T., du Toit R., van Helden P. D. Purification of sputum samples through sucrose improves detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jun;30(6):1514–1517. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1514-1517.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Woods G. L., Witebsky F. G. Current status of mycobacterial testing in clinical laboratories. Results of a questionnaire completed by participants in the College of American Pathologists Mycobacteriology E survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993 Sep;117(9):876–884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zolg J. W., Philippi-Schulz S. The superoxide dismutase gene, a target for detection and identification of mycobacteria by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2801–2812. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2801-2812.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES