Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1995 Dec;33(12):3186–3190. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3186-3190.1995

Sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for purified Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid.

J G Kuipers 1, K Scharmann 1, J Wollenhaupt 1, E Nettelnbreker 1, S Hopf 1, H Zeidler 1
PMCID: PMC228670  PMID: 8586699

Abstract

Routine microbiological diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced reactive arthritis is based mainly on the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis with urogenital swabs or in urine. Because chlamydial antigen, rRNA, and DNA are present in low quantities in the inflamed joint, highly sensitive assays are needed to detect C. trachomatis not only at the primary site of infection but also in peripheral blood and peripheral blood leukocytes, which are suspected carriers for dissemination, and in synovial fluid. To evaluate possible tools for this purpose, the sensitivities of PCR, MicroTrak, Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2 for the detection of defined numbers of purified C. trachomatis elementary bodies (EB) in urine, peripheral blood, peripheral blood leukocytes, and synovial fluid were determined. In urine, PCR detected 2, MicroTrak and ChlamydiaEIA detected 2 x 10(3), and PACE 2 and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(4) EB per ml. In peripheral blood, only PCR and MicroTrak detected C. trachomatis, with detection limits of 100 and 2 x 10(7) EB per ml, respectively. For peripheral blood leukocytes, the detection limits were 2 EB per ml for PCR and 2 x 10(4) EB per ml for MicroTrak, ChlamydiaEIA, IDEIA, and PACE 2. In synovial fluid, PCR detected 200, MicroTrak and IDEIA detected 2 x 10(5), and PACE 2 detected 10(6) EB per ml. ChlamydiaEIA was unable to detect 2 x 10(6) EB per ml in synovial fluid. In summary, PCR was found to be the most sensitive method. The sensitivities of the other methods tested were at least 1,000 times lower than that of PCR. PCR should therefore be considered a most promising tool for routine diagnosis of Chlamydia-induced arthritis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (258.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. An Q., Radcliffe G., Vassallo R., Buxton D., O'Brien W. J., Pelletier D. A., Weisburg W. G., Klinger J. D., Olive D. M. Infection with a plasmid-free variant Chlamydia related to Chlamydia trachomatis identified by using multiple assays for nucleic acid detection. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2814–2821. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2814-2821.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes R. C. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):119–136. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.2.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanding J., Hirsch L., Stranton N., Wright T., Aarnaes S., de la Maza L., Peterson E. M. Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia, the PACE 2 assay, and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a low-prevalence population. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1622–1625. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1622-1625.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bobo L., Coutlee F., Yolken R. H., Quinn T., Viscidi R. P. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1968–1973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1968-1973.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caldwell H. D., Kromhout J., Schachter J. Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. 1981 Mar;31(3):1161–1176. doi: 10.1128/iai.31.3.1161-1176.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chernesky M., Castriciano S., Sellors J., Stewart I., Cunningham I., Landis S., Seidelman W., Grant L., Devlin C., Mahony J. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures. J Infect Dis. 1990 Jan;161(1):124–126. doi: 10.1093/infdis/161.1.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Claas H. C., Wagenvoort J. H., Niesters H. G., Tio T. T., Van Rijsoort-Vos J. H., Quint W. G. Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for Chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Jan;29(1):42–45. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.42-45.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clarke L. M., Sierra M. F., Daidone B. J., Lopez N., Covino J. M., McCormack W. M. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Apr;31(4):968–971. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.968-971.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammer M., Nettelnbreker E., Hopf S., Schmitz E., Pörschke K., Zeidler H. Chlamydial rRNA in the joints of patients with Chlamydia-induced arthritis and undifferentiated arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1992 Jan-Feb;10(1):63–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keat A., Thomas B., Dixey J., Osborn M., Sonnex C., Taylor-Robinson D. Chlamydia trachomatis and reactive arthritis: the missing link. Lancet. 1987 Jan 10;1(8524):72–74. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91910-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mahony J. B., Luinstra K. E., Sellors J. W., Chernesky M. A. Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jul;31(7):1753–1758. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1753-1758.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mahony J., Castriciano S., Sellors J., Stewart I., Cunningham I., Landis S., Seidelman W., Grant L., Devlin C., Chernesky M. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Sep;27(9):1934–1938. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.1934-1938.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miyashita N., Matsumoto A. Establishment of a particle-counting method for purified elementary bodies of chlamydiae and evaluation of sensitivities of the IDEIA Chlamydia kit and DNA probe by using the purified elementary bodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Nov;30(11):2911–2916. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2911-2916.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ossewaarde J. M., Rieffe M., Rozenberg-Arska M., Ossenkoppele P. M., Nawrocki R. P., van Loon A. M. Development and clinical evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2122–2128. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2122-2128.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer H. M., Gilroy C. B., Thomas B. J., Hay P. E., Gilchrist C., Taylor-Robinson D. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Apr;44(4):321–325. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.4.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peterson E. M., Oda R., Alexander R., Greenwood J. R., de la Maza L. M. Molecular techniques for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2359–2363. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2359-2363.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rahman M. U., Cheema M. A., Schumacher H. R., Hudson A. P. Molecular evidence for the presence of chlamydia in the synovium of patients with Reiter's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1992 May;35(5):521–529. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ratti G., Moroni A., Cevenini R. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in patients with non-gonococcal urethritis using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jul;44(7):564–568. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.7.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schachter J. Chlamydial infections. West J Med. 1990 Nov;153(5):523–534. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schumacher H. R., Jr, Magge S., Cherian P. V., Sleckman J., Rothfuss S., Clayburne G., Sieck M. Light and electron microscopic studies on the synovial membrane in Reiter's syndrome. Immunocytochemical identification of chlamydial antigen in patients with early disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Aug;31(8):937–946. doi: 10.1002/art.1780310801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections. Ann Intern Med. 1988 May;108(5):710–717. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-5-710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor-Robinson D., Gilroy C. B., Thomas B. J., Keat A. C. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in joints of reactive arthritis patients by polymerase chain reaction. Lancet. 1992 Jul 11;340(8811):81–82. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90399-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thomas B. J., MacLeod E. J., Taylor-Robinson D. Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure. J Clin Pathol. 1993 May;46(5):408–410. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warren R., Dwyer B., Plackett M., Pettit K., Rizvi N., Baker A. M. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1663–1666. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1663-1666.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wordsworth B. P., Hughes R. A., Allan I., Keat A. C., Bell J. I. Chlamydial DNA is absent from the joints of patients with sexually acquired reactive arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1990 Jun;29(3):208–210. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/29.3.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES