Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Feb;34(2):398–403. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.398-403.1996

Typing multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: conflicting epidemiological data produced by genotypic and phenotypic methods clarified by phylogenetic analysis.

M Jorgensen 1, R Givney 1, M Pegler 1, A Vickery 1, G Funnell 1
PMCID: PMC228805  PMID: 8789023

Abstract

An outbreak of an unusual tetracycline-sensitive, rifampicin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain at a large teaching hospital was investigated. Two typing methods, phage typing and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (RFLP-PFGE), gave conflicting results which were clarified by phylogenetic analysis. Phage typing identified all the "epidemic-associated" strains as identical, while RFLP-PFGE further divided these strains into four pulsotypes. Phylogenetic analysis showed these four pulsotypes were related genetically and also recognized a second strain of MRSA causing a continuing cross-infection problem. Variation in the RFLP-PFGE pattern was shown to occur following lysogenization of phage-sensitive MRSA. These results indicate that in analyzing outbreaks caused by subgroups of clonal organisms like MRSA, it is necessary to use at least two typing methods and that conflicts between these could be resolved by phylogenetic analysis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (259.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bannerman T. L., Hancock G. A., Tenover F. C., Miller J. M. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Mar;33(3):551–555. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.3.551-555.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beard-Pegler M. A., Vickery A. M. Lysogenicity of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol. 1985 Oct;20(2):147–155. doi: 10.1099/00222615-20-2-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hall L. M. Are point mutations or DNA rearrangements responsible for the restriction fragment length polymorphisms that are used to type bacteria? Microbiology. 1994 Jan;140(Pt 1):197–204. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-1-197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Inglis B., Heding I., Merrylees M., Stewart P. R. Bacteriophage 604: a marker phage for multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australia. Epidemiol Infect. 1990 Apr;104(2):211–218. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800059379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kluytmans J., van Leeuwen W., Goessens W., Hollis R., Messer S., Herwaldt L., Bruining H., Heck M., Rost J., van Leeuwen N. Food-initiated outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus analyzed by pheno- and genotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1121–1128. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1121-1128.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nei M., Li W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smeltzer M. S., Hart M. E., Iandolo J. J. The effect of lysogeny on the genomic organization of Staphylococcus aureus. Gene. 1994 Jan 28;138(1-2):51–57. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90782-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tenover F. C., Arbeit R. D., Goering R. V., Mickelsen P. A., Murray B. E., Persing D. H., Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2233–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tenover F. C., Arbeit R., Archer G., Biddle J., Byrne S., Goering R., Hancock G., Hébert G. A., Hill B., Hollis R. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):407–415. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.407-415.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Udo E. E., Grubb W. B. Genetic analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a Nigerian hospital. J Med Microbiol. 1993 Mar;38(3):203–208. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-3-203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Upholt W. B. Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digests. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977;4(5):1257–1265. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.5.1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vickery A. M., Beard-Pegler M. A., Rountree P. M. Strain differentiation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathology. 1983 Jul;15(3):235–240. doi: 10.3109/00313028309083499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vickery A. M. Strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Australian hospitals from 1986 to 1990. Australian Group for Antimicrobial Resistance. J Hosp Infect. 1993 Jun;24(2):139–151. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(93)90076-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. el-Adhami W., Roberts L., Vickery A., Inglis B., Gibbs A., Stewart P. R. Epidemiological analysis of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak using restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genomic DNA. J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Dec;137(12):2713–2720. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-12-2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES