Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Feb;34(2):409–412. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.409-412.1996

Validation of catheter semiquantitative culture technique for nonstaphylococcal organisms.

D P Dooley 1, A Garcia 1, J W Kelly 1, R N Longfield 1, L Harrison 1
PMCID: PMC228807  PMID: 8789025

Abstract

The catheter semiquantitative culture roll tip technique has been validated as a discriminator between non-catheter-related bacteremias and catheter-related bacteremias (CRBs) caused by Staphylococcus species. However, this technique has not been specifically validated when used for the evaluation of catheters infected with organisms other than staphylococci. We reviewed catheters that had been submitted for semiquantitative roll tip culture as well as hospital records to determine clinical correlates of infection. Local infection and CRB were defined by standard criteria. Catheter-related sepsis (CRS) was defined as fever, leukocytosis, or hypotension which resolved with catheter removal, without another source of infection. For 195 catheters from 93 patients, gram-negative rods and enterococci were present on 36, fungi were on 25, Corynebacterium species were on 5, Bacillus species were on 3, Staphylococcus species were on 79, and 41 demonstrated no growth. Of 21 episodes of CRB or CRS due to nonstaphylococcal organisms, only 1 (questionable) episode was due to a catheter with < 15 CFU (P < 0.05). Eleven of these 21 episodes of CRB or CRS were due to gram-negative rods and enterococci, of which only the questionable episode was due to a catheter with < 15 CFU. Nine of these 21 episodes of CRB or CRS were due to fungi, none of which were associated with a catheter with < 15 CFU. The data for Staphylococcus species recapitulated published data (none of 21 CRB or CRS episodes were associated with catheters with < 15 CFU) and validated this retrospective technique. The data presented in this study validate the use of the semiquantitative culture technique for the evaluation of catheter-related infections caused by organisms other than staphylococci.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (176.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adam R. D., Edwards L. D., Becker C. C., Schrom H. M. Semiquantitative cultures and routine tip cultures on umbilical catheters. J Pediatr. 1982 Jan;100(1):123–126. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brun-Buisson C., Abrouk F., Legrand P., Huet Y., Larabi S., Rapin M. Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med. 1987 May;147(5):873–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cercenado E., Ena J., Rodríguez-Créixems M., Romero I., Bouza E. A conservative procedure for the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jul;150(7):1417–1420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleri D. J., Corrado M. L., Seligman S. J. Quantitative culture of intravenous catheters and other intravascular inserts. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jun;141(6):781–786. doi: 10.1093/infdis/141.6.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collignon P. J., Soni N., Pearson I. Y., Woods W. P., Munro R., Sorrell T. C. Is semiquantitative culture of central vein catheter tips useful in the diagnosis of catheter-associated bacteremia? J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;24(4):532–535. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.532-535.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maki D. G., Goldman D. A., Rhame F. S. Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1973 Dec;79(6):867–887. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-79-6-867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maki D. G., Weise C. E., Sarafin H. W. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med. 1977 Jun 9;296(23):1305–1309. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Raad I. I., Bodey G. P. Infectious complications of indwelling vascular catheters. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Aug;15(2):197–208. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.2.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sherertz R. J., Raad I. I., Belani A., Koo L. C., Rand K. H., Pickett D. L., Straub S. A., Fauerbach L. L. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jan;28(1):76–82. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.1.76-82.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stamm W. E. Infections related to medical devices. Ann Intern Med. 1978 Nov;89(5 Pt 2 Suppl):764–769. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-89-5-764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vanhuynegem L., Parmentier P., Potvliege C. In situ bacteriologic diagnosis of total parenteral nutrition catheter infection. Surgery. 1988 Feb;103(2):174–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weinstein M. P., Reller L. B., Murphy J. R., Lichtenstein K. A. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):35–53. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES