Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 Mar 2;112(6):1055–1063. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.6.1055

Preservation of specific RNA distribution within the chromatin-depleted nuclear substructure demonstrated by in situ hybridization coupled with biochemical fractionation

PMCID: PMC2288899  PMID: 1705562

Abstract

Biochemical fractionation procedures previously shown to remove 95% of cellular protein, DNA, and phospholipid, were combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization to provide a critical evaluation of the retention and spatial preservation of specific primary transcripts within the chromatin-depleted nuclear substructure, operationally defined as the nuclear "matrix." This unique approach made it possible to directly address whether nuclear extraction procedures preserve, create, or destroy ribonucleoprotein filament structures. Comparison of nuclei before and after fractionation demonstrated that localized foci or "tracks" of specific nRNA are unambiguously retained in the nuclear matrix preparation. Two well-characterized nuclear fractionation procedures were used and three Epstein-Barr virus-infected cell types investigated, including latently and permissively infected cells carrying integrated or episomal genomes. The EBV primary transcripts as well as nucleolar RNA were preserved within the remaining nuclear substructure with unambiguous spatial and quantitative fidelity. Image processing and quantitative microfluorimetry, together with [3H]thymidine labeling of DNA, show that essentially 100% of the RNA signal intensity remained after removal of 85% of the DNA. That the native RNA distribution was unchanged was shown in other experiments in which the same individual nRNA tracks were examined before and after fractionation. Results conclusively demonstrate that the tight restriction of RNA to highly localized sites is independent of bulk DNA removal and of extensive extraction of proteins and phospholipids. Hence, this work provides direct visual evidence that the primary transcripts studied are localized via their binding to, or comprising part of, non-chromatin nuclear substructure.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (5.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barni S., Gerzeli G. The use of propidium iodide in cytochemical studies of interphase chromatin structure. Basic Appl Histochem. 1985;29(3):215–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berezney R., Coffey D. S. Identification of a nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1974 Oct 23;60(4):1410–1417. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(74)90355-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berezney R. Fractionation of the nuclear matrix. I. Partial separation into matrix protein fibrils and a residual ribonucleoprotein fraction. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):641–650. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8527–8529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ciejek E. M., Nordstrom J. L., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Ribonucleic acid precursors are associated with the chick oviduct nuclear matrix. Biochemistry. 1982 Sep 28;21(20):4945–4953. doi: 10.1021/bi00263a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ciejek E. M., Tsai M. J., O'Malley B. W. Actively transcribed genes are associated with the nuclear matrix. Nature. 1983 Dec 8;306(5943):607–609. doi: 10.1038/306607a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coleman A. W., Maguire M. J., Coleman J. R. Mithramycin- and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-DNA staining for fluorescence microspectrophotometric measurement of DNA in nuclei, plastids, and virus particles. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981 Aug;29(8):959–968. doi: 10.1177/29.8.6168681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Faiferman I., Pogo A. O. Isolation of a nuclear ribonucleoprotein network that contains heterogeneous RNA and is bound to the nuclear envelope. Biochemistry. 1975 Aug 26;14(17):3808–3816. doi: 10.1021/bi00688a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fey E. G., Krochmalnic G., Penman S. The nonchromatin substructures of the nucleus: the ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-containing and RNP-depleted matrices analyzed by sequential fractionation and resinless section electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1654–1665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fey E. G., Ornelles D. A., Penman S. Association of RNA with the cytoskeleton and the nuclear matrix. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1986;5:99–119. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1986.supplement_5.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fey E. G., Wan K. M., Penman S. Epithelial cytoskeletal framework and nuclear matrix-intermediate filament scaffold: three-dimensional organization and protein composition. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):1973–1984. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallinaro H., Puvion E., Kister L., Jacob M. Nuclear matrix and hnRNP share a common structural constituent associated with premessenger RNA. EMBO J. 1983;2(6):953–960. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01527.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. He D. C., Nickerson J. A., Penman S. Core filaments of the nuclear matrix. J Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;110(3):569–580. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Henderson A., Ripley S., Heller M., Kieff E. Chromosome site for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in a Burkitt tumor cell line and in lymphocytes growth-transformed in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):1987–1991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jackson D. A., Cook P. R. Visualization of a filamentous nucleoskeleton with a 23 nm axial repeat. EMBO J. 1988 Dec 1;7(12):3667–3677. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03248.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson D. A., McCready S. J., Cook P. R. RNA is synthesized at the nuclear cage. Nature. 1981 Aug 6;292(5823):552–555. doi: 10.1038/292552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lawrence J. B., Marselle L. M., Byron K. S., Johnson C. V., Sullivan J. L., Singer R. H. Subcellular localization of low-abundance human immunodeficiency virus nucleic acid sequences visualized by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5420–5424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawrence J. B., Singer R. H., Marselle L. M. Highly localized tracks of specific transcripts within interphase nuclei visualized by in situ hybridization. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):493–502. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90924-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lawrence J. B., Singer R. H. Quantitative analysis of in situ hybridization methods for the detection of actin gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985 Mar 11;13(5):1777–1799. doi: 10.1093/nar/13.5.1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lawrence J. B., Villnave C. A., Singer R. H. Sensitive, high-resolution chromatin and chromosome mapping in situ: presence and orientation of two closely integrated copies of EBV in a lymphoma line. Cell. 1988 Jan 15;52(1):51–61. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90530-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Long B. H., Huang C. Y., Pogo A. O. Isolation and characterization of the nuclear matrix in Friend erythroleukemia cells: chromatin and hnRNA interactions with the nuclear matrix. Cell. 1979 Dec;18(4):1079–1090. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90221-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mariman E. C., van Eekelen C. A., Reinders R. J., Berns A. J., van Venrooij W. J. Adenoviral heterogeneous nuclear RNA is associated with the host nuclear matrix during splicing. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 5;154(1):103–119. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90420-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nelson W. G., Pienta K. J., Barrack E. R., Coffey D. S. The role of the nuclear matrix in the organization and function of DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:457–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.002325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nickerson J. A., Krochmalnic G., Wan K. M., Penman S. Chromatin architecture and nuclear RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(1):177–181. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ross D. A., Yen R. W., Chae C. B. Association of globin ribonucleic acid and its precursors with the chicken erythroblast nuclear matrix. Biochemistry. 1982 Feb 16;21(4):764–771. doi: 10.1021/bi00533a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schröder H. C., Bachmann M., Diehl-Seifert B., Müller W. E. Transport of mRNA from nucleus to cytoplasm. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1987;34:89–142. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60494-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Skare J., Strominger J. L. Cloning and mapping of BamHi endonuclease fragments of DNA from the transforming B95-8 strain of Epstein-Barr virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):3860–3864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Verheijen R., van Venrooij W., Ramaekers F. The nuclear matrix: structure and composition. J Cell Sci. 1988 May;90(Pt 1):11–36. doi: 10.1242/jcs.90.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zeitlin S., Parent A., Silverstein S., Efstratiadis A. Pre-mRNA splicing and the nuclear matrix. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;7(1):111–120. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.1.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zeitlin S., Wilson R. C., Efstratiadis A. Autonomous splicing and complementation of in vivo-assembled spliceosomes. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):765–777. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van Eekelen C. A., van Venrooij W. J. hnRNA and its attachment to a nuclear protein matrix. J Cell Biol. 1981 Mar;88(3):554–563. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.3.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Santen V., Cheung A., Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus RNA VII: size and direction of transcription of virus-specified cytoplasmic RNAs in a transformed cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1930–1934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES