Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 Mar 2;112(6):1165–1175. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.6.1165

Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro

PMCID: PMC2288901  PMID: 1999468

Abstract

We have developed a system for studying the motions of cellular objects attached to depolymerizing microtubules in vitro. Radial arrays of microtubules were grown from lysed and extracted Tetrahymena cells attached to a glass coverslip that formed the top of a light microscope perfusion chamber. A preparation of chromosomes, which also contained vesicles, was then perfused into the chamber and allowed to bind to the microtubule array. The concentration of tubulin was then reduced by perfusing buffer that lacked both tubulin and nucleotide triphosphates, and the resulting microtubule depolymerization was observed by light microscopy. A fraction of the bound objects detached in the flow and washed away, while others stabilized the microtubules to which they were bound. Some of the particles and chromosomes, however, moved in toward the Tetrahymena ghost as their associated microtubules shortened. The mean speeds for particles and chromosomes were 26 +/- 20 and 15 +/- 12 microns/min, respectively. These motions occurred when nucleotide triphosphate levels were very low, as a result of either dilution or by the action of apyrase. Furthermore, the motions were unaffected by 100 microM sodium orthovanadate, suggesting that these forces are not the result of ATP hydrolysis by a minus end-directed mechanoenzyme. We conclude that microtubule depolymerization provided the free energy for the motions observed. All the objects that we studied in detail moved against a stream of buffer flowing at approximately 100 microns/s, so that the force being developed was at least 10(-7) dynes. This force is large enough to contribute to some forms of motility in living cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Forer A. Does actin produce the force that moves a chromosome to the pole during anaphase? Can J Biochem Cell Biol. 1985 Jun;63(6):585–598. doi: 10.1139/o85-077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuseler J. W. Temperature dependence of anaphase chromosome velocity and microtubule depolymerization. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):789–800. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heidemann S. R., McIntosh J. R. Visualization of the structural polarity of microtubules. Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):517–519. doi: 10.1038/286517a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hill T. L., Kirschner M. W. Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly-disassembly. Int Rev Cytol. 1982;78:1–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill T. L. Microfilament or microtubule assembly or disassembly against a force. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5613–5617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hotani H., Miyamoto H. Dynamic features of microtubules as visualized by dark-field microscopy. Adv Biophys. 1990;26:135–156. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(90)90010-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Inoué S. Cell division and the mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):131s–147s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.131s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koshland D. E., Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro. Nature. 1988 Feb 11;331(6156):499–504. doi: 10.1038/331499a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lye R. J., Porter M. E., Scholey J. M., McIntosh J. R. Identification of a microtubule-based cytoplasmic motor in the nematode C. elegans. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):309–318. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90157-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDonald H. B., Stewart R. J., Goldstein L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McIntosh J. R., Koonce M. P. Mitosis. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):622–628. doi: 10.1126/science.2683078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McIntosh J. R., Porter M. E. Enzymes for microtubule-dependent motility. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6001–6004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. I. Microtubule nucleation and tubulin binding. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):755–765. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicklas R. B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):542–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Paschal B. M., Vallee R. B. Retrograde transport by the microtubule-associated protein MAP 1C. Nature. 1987 Nov 12;330(6144):181–183. doi: 10.1038/330181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pfarr C. M., Coue M., Grissom P. M., Hays T. S., Porter M. E., McIntosh J. R. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):263–265. doi: 10.1038/345263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raff E. C. Genetics of microtubule systems. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):1–10. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rebhun L. I. Polarized intracellular particle transport: saltatory movements and cytoplasmic streaming. Int Rev Cytol. 1972;32:93–137. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60339-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roos U. P. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. II. Kinetochore structure and function. Chromosoma. 1973;41(2):195–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00319696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salmon E. D. Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. I. Changes in birefringence and spindle length. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jun;65(3):603–614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.3.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Salmon E. D. Spindle microtubules: thermodynamics of in vivo assembly and role in chromosome movement. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:383–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schroer T. A., Schnapp B. J., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. The role of kinesin and other soluble factors in organelle movement along microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1988 Nov;107(5):1785–1792. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.5.1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schroer T. A., Steuer E. R., Sheetz M. P. Cytoplasmic dynein is a minus end-directed motor for membranous organelles. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):937–946. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shpetner H. S., Paschal B. M., Vallee R. B. Characterization of the microtubule-activated ATPase of brain cytoplasmic dynein (MAP 1C). J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):1001–1009. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.3.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spurck T. P., Pickett-Heaps J. D. On the mechanism of anaphase A: evidence that ATP is needed for microtubule disassembly and not generation of polewards force. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1691–1705. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Steuer E. R., Wordeman L., Schroer T. A., Sheetz M. P. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):266–268. doi: 10.1038/345266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tilney L. G., Porter K. R. Studies on the microtubules in heliozoa. II. The effect of low temperature on these structures in the formation and maintenance of the axopodia. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jul;34(1):327–343. doi: 10.1083/jcb.34.1.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vale R. D., Schnapp B. J., Mitchison T., Steuer E., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Different axoplasmic proteins generate movement in opposite directions along microtubules in vitro. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):623–632. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90234-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vale R. D., Soll D. R., Gibbons I. R. One-dimensional diffusion of microtubules bound to flagellar dynein. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):915–925. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90614-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Williams R. C., Jr, Detrich H. W., 3rd Separation of tubulin from microtubule-associated proteins on phosphocellulose. Accompanying alterations in concentrations of buffer components. Biochemistry. 1979 Jun 12;18(12):2499–2503. doi: 10.1021/bi00579a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES