Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 May 1;113(3):465–483. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.465

Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins in the amphibian germinal vesicle: loops, spheres, and snurposomes

PMCID: PMC2288976  PMID: 1826687

Abstract

We have examined the distribution of snRNPs in the germinal vesicle (GV) of frogs and salamanders by immunofluorescent staining and in situ nucleic acid hybridization. The major snRNAs involved in pre-mRNA splicing (U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6) occur together in nearly all loops of the lampbrush chromosomes, and in hundreds to thousands of small granules (1-4 microns diameter) suspended in the nucleoplasm. The loops and granules also contain several antigens that are regularly associated with snRNAs or spliceosomes (the Sm antigen, U1- and U2- specific antigens, and the splicing factor SC35). A second type of granule, often distinguishable by morphology, contains only U1 snRNA and associated antigens. We propose the term "snurposome" to describe the granules that contain snRNPs ("snurps"). Those that contain only U1 snRNA are A snurposomes, whereas those that contain all the splicing snRNAs are B snurposomes. GVs contain a third type of snRNP granule, which we call the C snurposome. C snurposomes range in size from less than 1 micron to giant structures greater than 20 microns in diameter. Usually, although not invariably, they have B snurposomes on their surface. They may also contain from one to hundreds of inclusions. Because of their remarkably spherical shape, C snurposomes with their associated B snurposomes have long been referred to as spheres or sphere organelles. Most spheres are free in the nucleoplasm, but a few are attached to chromosomes at specific chromosome loci, the sphere organizers (SOs). The relationship of sphere organelles to other snRNP- containing structures in the GV is obscure. We show by immunofluorescent staining that the lampbrush loops and B snurposomes also react with antibodies against heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs). Transcription units on the loops are uniformly stained by anti-hnRNP and anti-snRNP antibodies, suggesting that nascent transcripts are associated with hnRNPs and snRNPs along their entire length, perhaps in the form of a unitary hnRNP/snRNP particle. That B snurposomes contain so many components involved in pre- mRNA packaging and processing suggests that they may serve as sites for assembly and storage of hnRNP/snRNP complexes destined for transport to the nascent transcripts on the lampbrush chromosome loops.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Angelier N., Lacroix J. C. Complexes de transcription d'origines nucléolaire et chromosomique d'ovocytes de Pleurodeles waltlii et P. poireti (amphibiens, urodèles) Chromosoma. 1975 Aug 11;51(4):323–335. doi: 10.1007/BF00326319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beyer A. L., Osheim Y. N. Splice site selection, rate of splicing, and alternative splicing on nascent transcripts. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):754–765. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black D. L., Pinto A. L. U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein: RNA structure analysis and ATP-dependent interaction with U4/U6. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;9(8):3350–3359. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.8.3350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brody E., Abelson J. The "spliceosome": yeast pre-messenger RNA associates with a 40S complex in a splicing-dependent reaction. Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):963–967. doi: 10.1126/science.3890181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruzik J. P., Steitz J. A. Spliced leader RNA sequences can substitute for the essential 5' end of U1 RNA during splicing in a mammalian in vitro system. Cell. 1990 Sep 7;62(5):889–899. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90264-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Callan H. G., Gall J. G., Berg C. A. The lampbrush chromosomes of Xenopus laevis: preparation, identification, and distribution of 5S DNA sequences. Chromosoma. 1987;95(4):236–250. doi: 10.1007/BF00294780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carmo-Fonseca M., Tollervey D., Pepperkok R., Barabino S. M., Merdes A., Brunner C., Zamore P. D., Green M. R., Hurt E., Lamond A. I. Mammalian nuclei contain foci which are highly enriched in components of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. EMBO J. 1991 Jan;10(1):195–206. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07936.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Robertis E. M., Lienhard S., Parisot R. F. Intracellular transport of microinjected 5S and small nuclear RNAs. Nature. 1982 Feb 18;295(5850):572–577. doi: 10.1038/295572a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diaz M. O., Barsacchi-Pilone G., Mahon K. A., Gall J. G. Transcripts from both strands of a satellite DNA occur on lampbrush chromosome loops of the newt Notophthalmus. Cell. 1981 Jun;24(3):649–659. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dreyfuss G. Structure and function of nuclear and cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:459–498. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.002331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fakan S., Leser G., Martin T. E. Immunoelectron microscope visualization of nuclear ribonucleoprotein antigens within spread transcription complexes. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1153–1157. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fisher D. E., Conner G. E., Reeves W. H., Blobel G., Kunkel H. G. Synthesis and assembly of human small nuclear ribonucleoproteins generated by cell-free translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6356–6360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Forbes D. J., Kornberg T. B., Kirschner M. W. Small nuclear RNA transcription and ribonucleoprotein assembly in early Xenopus development. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):62–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fritz A., Parisot R., Newmeyer D., De Robertis E. M. Small nuclear U-ribonucleoproteins in Xenopus laevis development. Uncoupled accumulation of the protein and RNA components. J Mol Biol. 1984 Sep 15;178(2):273–285. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90144-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fu X. D., Maniatis T. Factor required for mammalian spliceosome assembly is localized to discrete regions in the nucleus. Nature. 1990 Feb 1;343(6257):437–441. doi: 10.1038/343437a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gall J. G., Callan H. G. The sphere organelle contains small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(17):6635–6639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gall J. G., Stephenson E. C., Erba H. P., Diaz M. O., Barsacchi-Pilone G. Histone genes are located at the sphere loci of newt lampbrush chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1981;84(2):159–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00399128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamm J., Darzynkiewicz E., Tahara S. M., Mattaj I. W. The trimethylguanosine cap structure of U1 snRNA is a component of a bipartite nuclear targeting signal. Cell. 1990 Aug 10;62(3):569–577. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamm J., Mattaj I. W. Monomethylated cap structures facilitate RNA export from the nucleus. Cell. 1990 Oct 5;63(1):109–118. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90292-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krainer A. R. Pre-mRNA splicing by complementation with purified human U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5 snRNPs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Oct 25;16(20):9415–9429. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lacroix J. C., Azzouz R., Boucher D., Abbadie C., Pyne C. K., Charlemagne J. Monoclonal antibodies to lampbrush chromosome antigens of Pleurodeles waltlii. Chromosoma. 1985;92(1):69–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00327246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lerner E. A., Lerner M. R., Janeway C. A., Jr, Steitz J. A. Monoclonal antibodies to nucleic acid-containing cellular constituents: probes for molecular biology and autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):2737–2741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lerner M. R., Steitz J. A. Antibodies to small nuclear RNAs complexed with proteins are produced by patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5495–5499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leser G. P., Escara-Wilke J., Martin T. E. Monoclonal antibodies to heterogeneous nuclear RNA-protein complexes. The core proteins comprise a conserved group of related polypeptides. J Biol Chem. 1984 Feb 10;259(3):1827–1833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leser G. P., Fakan S., Martin T. E. Ultrastructural distribution of ribonucleoprotein complexes during mitosis. snRNP antigens are contained in mitotic granule clusters. Eur J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;50(2):376–389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin R., Leone J. W., Cook R. G., Allis C. D. Antibodies specific to acetylated histones document the existence of deposition- and transcription-related histone acetylation in Tetrahymena. J Cell Biol. 1989 May;108(5):1577–1588. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.5.1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. Differential accumulation of U1 and U4 small nuclear RNAs during Xenopus development. Genes Dev. 1987 Mar;1(1):39–46. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maniatis T., Reed R. The role of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles in pre-mRNA splicing. Nature. 1987 Feb 19;325(6106):673–678. doi: 10.1038/325673a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Miller T. J., Stephens D. L., Mertz J. E. Kinetics of accumulation and processing of simian virus 40 RNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes injected with simian virus 40 DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;2(12):1581–1594. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.12.1581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neuman de Vegvar H. E., Dahlberg J. E. Nucleocytoplasmic transport and processing of small nuclear RNA precursors. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;10(7):3365–3375. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.7.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nyman U., Hallman H., Hadlaczky G., Pettersson I., Sharp G., Ringertz N. R. Intranuclear localization of snRNP antigens. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):137–144. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Osheim Y. N., Miller O. L., Jr, Beyer A. L. RNP particles at splice junction sequences on Drosophila chorion transcripts. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):143–151. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan Z. Q., Prives C. Assembly of functional U1 and U2 human-amphibian hybrid snRNPs in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Science. 1988 Sep 9;241(4871):1328–1331. doi: 10.1126/science.2970672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pan Z. Q., Prives C. U2 snRNA sequences that bind U2-specific proteins are dispensable for the function of U2 snRNP in splicing. Genes Dev. 1989 Dec;3(12A):1887–1898. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.12a.1887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pettersson I., Hinterberger M., Mimori T., Gottlieb E., Steitz J. A. The structure of mammalian small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. Identification of multiple protein components reactive with anti-(U1)ribonucleoprotein and anti-Sm autoantibodies. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 10;259(9):5907–5914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Piñol-Roma S., Swanson M. S., Gall J. G., Dreyfuss G. A novel heterogeneous nuclear RNP protein with a unique distribution on nascent transcripts. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):2575–2587. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reed R., Griffith J., Maniatis T. Purification and visualization of native spliceosomes. Cell. 1988 Jun 17;53(6):949–961. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)90489-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reed R. Protein composition of mammalian spliceosomes assembled in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(20):8031–8035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.8031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reuter R., Appel B., Bringmann P., Rinke J., Lührmann R. 5'-Terminal caps of snRNAs are reactive with antibodies specific for 2,2,7-trimethylguanosine in whole cells and nuclear matrices. Double-label immunofluorescent studies with anti-m3G antibodies and with anti-RNP and anti-Sm autoantibodies. Exp Cell Res. 1984 Oct;154(2):548–560. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Roth M. B., Gall J. G. Monoclonal antibodies that recognize transcription unit proteins on newt lampbrush chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;105(3):1047–1054. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Roth M. B., Gall J. G. Targeting of a chromosomal protein to the nucleus and to lampbrush chromosome loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb;86(4):1269–1272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Roth M. B., Murphy C., Gall J. G. A monoclonal antibody that recognizes a phosphorylated epitope stains lampbrush chromosome loops and small granules in the amphibian germinal vesicle. J Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;111(6 Pt 1):2217–2223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sass H., Pederson T. Transcription-dependent localization of U1 and U2 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins at major sites of gene activity in polytene chromosomes. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 25;180(4):911–926. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90263-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Scheer U., Franke W. W., Trendelenburg M. F., Spring H. Classification of loops of lampbrush chromosomes according to the arrangement of transcriptional complexes. J Cell Sci. 1976 Dec;22(3):503–519. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Singh R., Reddy R. Gamma-monomethyl phosphate: a cap structure in spliceosomal U6 small nuclear RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(21):8280–8283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.21.8280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Spector D. L. Higher order nuclear organization: three-dimensional distribution of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):147–151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wallace R. A., Jared D. W., Dumont J. N., Sega M. W. Protein incorporation by isolated amphibian oocytes. 3. Optimum incubation conditions. J Exp Zool. 1973 Jun;184(3):321–333. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401840305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wickens M. P., Gurdon J. B. Post-transcriptional processing of simian virus 40 late transcripts in injected frog oocytes. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jan 5;163(1):1–26. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90027-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wickens M. P., Woo S., O'Malley B. W., Gurdon J. B. Expression of a chicken chromosomal ovalbumin gene injected into frog oocyte nuclei. Nature. 1980 Jun 26;285(5767):628–634. doi: 10.1038/285628a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zeller R., Nyffenegger T., De Robertis E. M. Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of snRNPs and stockpiled snRNA-binding proteins during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1983 Feb;32(2):425–434. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zieve G. W., Sauterer R. A. Cell biology of the snRNP particles. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1990;25(1):1–46. doi: 10.3109/10409239009090604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES