Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 Sep 1;114(5):1017–1028. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.5.1017

Evidence for the involvement of microtubules, ER, and kinesin in the cortical rotation of fertilized frog eggs

PMCID: PMC2289112  PMID: 1714912

Abstract

During the first cell cycle, the vegetal cortex of the fertilized frog egg is translocated over the cytoplasm. This process of cortical rotation creates regional cytoplasmic differences important in later development, and appears to involve an array of aligned microtubules that forms transiently beneath the vegetal cortex. We have investigated how these microtubules might be involved in generating movement by analyzing isolated cortices and sections of Xenopus laevis and Rana pipiens eggs. First, the polarity of the cortical microtubules was determined using the "hook" assay. Almost all microtubules had their plus ends pointing in the direction of cortical rotation. Secondly, the association of microtubules with other cytoplasmic elements was examined. Immunofluorescence revealed that cytokeratin filaments coalign with the microtubules. The timing of their appearance and their position on the cytoplasmic side of the microtubules suggested that they are not involved directly in generating movement. ER was visualized with the dye DiIC16(3) and by immunofluorescence with anti- BiP (Bole, D. G., L. M. Hendershot, and J. F. Kearney, 1986. J. Cell Biol. 102:1558-1566). One layer of ER was found closely underlying the plasma membrane at all times. An additional, deeper layer formed in association with the microtubules of the array. Antibodies to sea urchin kinesin (Ingold, A. L., S. A. Cohn, and J. M. Scholey. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 107:2657-2667) detected antigens associated with both the ER and microtubules. On immunoblots they recognized microtubule associated polypeptide(s) of approximately 115 kD from Xenopus eggs. These observations are consistent with a role for kinesin in creating movement between the microtubules and ER, which leads in turn to the cortical rotation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andreuccetti P., Denis-Donini S., Burrini A. G., Campanella C. Calcium ultrastructural localization in Xenopus laevis eggs following activation by pricking or by calcium ionophore A 23187. J Exp Zool. 1984 Feb;229(2):295–308. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402290215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bole D. G., Dowin R., Doriaux M., Jamieson J. D. Immunocytochemical localization of BiP to the rough endoplasmic reticulum: evidence for protein sorting by selective retention. J Histochem Cytochem. 1989 Dec;37(12):1817–1823. doi: 10.1177/37.12.2685110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bole D. G., Hendershot L. M., Kearney J. F. Posttranslational association of immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein with nascent heavy chains in nonsecreting and secreting hybridomas. J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1558–1566. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campanella C., Andreuccetti P. Ultrastructural observations on cortical endoplasmic reticulum and on residual cortical granules in the egg of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1977 Mar;56(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dabora S. L., Sheetz M. P. The microtubule-dependent formation of a tubulovesicular network with characteristics of the ER from cultured cell extracts. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):27–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elinson R. P. Changes in levels of polymeric tubulin associated with activation and dorsoventral polarization of the frog egg. Dev Biol. 1985 May;109(1):224–233. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90362-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elinson R. P. Cytoplasmic phases in the first cell cycle of the activated frog egg. Dev Biol. 1983 Dec;100(2):440–451. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90237-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elinson R. P., Houliston E. Cytoskeleton in Xenopus oocytes and eggs. Semin Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;1(5):349–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Elinson R. P. Microtubules and specification of the dorsoventral axis in frog embryos. Bioessays. 1989 Nov;11(5):124–127. doi: 10.1002/bies.950110503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elinson R. P., Rowning B. A transient array of parallel microtubules in frog eggs: potential tracks for a cytoplasmic rotation that specifies the dorso-ventral axis. Dev Biol. 1988 Jul;128(1):185–197. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90281-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Godsave S. F., Wylie C. C., Lane E. B., Anderton B. H. Intermediate filaments in the Xenopus oocyte: the appearance and distribution of cytokeratin-containing filaments. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1984 Oct;83:157–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grey R. D., Wolf D. P., Hedrick J. L. Formation and structure of the fertilization envelope in Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1974 Jan;36(1):44–61. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(74)90189-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hebard C. N., Herold R. C. The ultrastructure of the cortical cytoplasm in the unfertilized egg and first cleavage zygote of Xenopus laevis. Exp Cell Res. 1967 Jun;46(3):553–570. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(67)90381-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heidemann S. R., McIntosh J. R. Visualization of the structural polarity of microtubules. Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):517–519. doi: 10.1038/286517a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henson J. H., Begg D. A., Beaulieu S. M., Fishkind D. J., Bonder E. M., Terasaki M., Lebeche D., Kaminer B. A calsequestrin-like protein in the endoplasmic reticulum of the sea urchin: localization and dynamics in the egg and first cell cycle embryo. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):149–161. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollenbeck P. J., Swanson J. A. Radial extension of macrophage tubular lysosomes supported by kinesin. Nature. 1990 Aug 30;346(6287):864–866. doi: 10.1038/346864a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hollenbeck P. J. The distribution, abundance and subcellular localization of kinesin. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;108(6):2335–2342. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.6.2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Houliston E., Elinson R. P. Patterns of microtubule polymerization relating to cortical rotation in Xenopus laevis eggs. Development. 1991 May;112(1):107–117. doi: 10.1242/dev.112.1.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ingold A. L., Cohn S. A., Scholey J. M. Inhibition of kinesin-driven microtubule motility by monoclonal antibodies to kinesin heavy chains. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 2):2657–2667. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kachar B., Reese T. S. The mechanism of cytoplasmic streaming in characean algal cells: sliding of endoplasmic reticulum along actin filaments. J Cell Biol. 1988 May;106(5):1545–1552. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.5.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaprielian Z., Fambrough D. M. Expression of fast and slow isoforms of the Ca2+-ATPase in developing chick skeletal muscle. Dev Biol. 1987 Dec;124(2):490–503. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90502-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):576–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klymkowsky M. W., Maynell L. A., Polson A. G. Polar asymmetry in the organization of the cortical cytokeratin system of Xenopus laevis oocytes and embryos. Development. 1987 Jul;100(3):543–557. doi: 10.1242/dev.100.3.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McDonald H. B., Stewart R. J., Goldstein L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McDonald K. Osmium ferricyanide fixation improves microfilament preservation and membrane visualization in a variety of animal cell types. J Ultrastruct Res. 1984 Feb;86(2):107–118. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(84)80051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neighbors B. W., Williams R. C., Jr, McIntosh J. R. Localization of kinesin in cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1193–1204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pfister K. K., Wagner M. C., Stenoien D. L., Brady S. T., Bloom G. S. Monoclonal antibodies to kinesin heavy and light chains stain vesicle-like structures, but not microtubules, in cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1453–1463. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sardet C., Chang P. The egg cortex: from maturation through fertilization. Cell Differ. 1987 Jun;21(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/0045-6039(87)90443-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saxton W. M., Porter M. E., Cohn S. A., Scholey J. M., Raff E. C., McIntosh J. R. Drosophila kinesin: characterization of microtubule motility and ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(4):1109–1113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scharf S. R., Gerhart J. C. Axis determination in eggs of Xenopus laevis: a critical period before first cleavage, identified by the common effects of cold, pressure and ultraviolet irradiation. Dev Biol. 1983 Sep;99(1):75–87. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90255-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schliwa M., Euteneuer U., Bulinski J. C., Izant J. G. Calcium lability of cytoplasmic microtubules and its modulation by microtubule-associated proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1037–1041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Scholey J. M., Heuser J., Yang J. T., Goldstein L. S. Identification of globular mechanochemical heads of kinesin. Nature. 1989 Mar 23;338(6213):355–357. doi: 10.1038/338355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Terasaki M., Chen L. B., Fujiwara K. Microtubules and the endoplasmic reticulum are highly interdependent structures. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1557–1568. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vale R. D., Goldstein L. S. One motor, many tails: an expanding repertoire of force-generating enzymes. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):883–885. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90334-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vale R. D., Hotani H. Formation of membrane networks in vitro by kinesin-driven microtubule movement. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 1):2233–2241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vincent J. P., Oster G. F., Gerhart J. C. Kinematics of gray crescent formation in Xenopus eggs: the displacement of subcortical cytoplasm relative to the egg surface. Dev Biol. 1986 Feb;113(2):484–500. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90184-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vincent J. P., Scharf S. R., Gerhart J. C. Subcortical rotation in Xenopus eggs: a preliminary study of its mechanochemical basis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8(2):143–154. doi: 10.1002/cm.970080206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wright B. D., Henson J. H., Wedaman K. P., Willy P. J., Morand J. N., Scholey J. M. Subcellular localization and sequence of sea urchin kinesin heavy chain: evidence for its association with membranes in the mitotic apparatus and interphase cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(4):817–833. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.4.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES