Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1991 Sep 2;114(6):1191–1199. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.6.1191

Stopped-flow measurement of cytoskeletal contraction: Dictyostelium myosin II is specifically required for contraction of amoeba cytoskeletons

PMCID: PMC2289138  PMID: 1894693

Abstract

Cytoskeletons provide valuable information on the composition and organization of the cell's contractile machinery, and in many cases these cell models retain the ability to contract. To quantitate contraction rates, we developed a novel stopped-flow assay permitting simultaneous analysis of thousands of Dictyostelium cytoskeletons within milliseconds of mixing with Mg-ATP. Cytoskeletons were placed in one syringe of the stopped flow apparatus and the appropriate buffer was placed in the second syringe. Mixing with Mg-ATP caused an immediate increase in the absorbance at 310 nm. Rapid fixation of the cytoskeletons during the reaction confirmed that this change in absorbance was highly correlated with contraction of the cytoskeletons. This spectroscopic change was used to measure the effects of temperature, pH, ionic strength, and nucleotides on contraction rate. Treatment with high salt and ATP removed most of the myosin, some actin, and small amounts of minor proteins. These extracted cytoskeletons lost the ability to contract, but after the addition of purified Dictyostelium myosin they regained full function. In contrast, rabbit skeletal muscle myosin was unable to restore contractility, even though it bound to the extracted cytoskeletons. Cytoskeletons prepared from a myosin-null mutant did not contract. Upon the addition of purified ameba myosin, however, they became contractile. These results suggest that filamentous Dictyostelium myosin II is essential for contraction, and that the actin cytoskeleton and associated proteins retain their functional organization in the absence of myosin.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,003.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barylko B., Tooth P., Kendrick-Jones J. Proteolytic fragmentation of brain myosin and localisation of the heavy-chain phosphorylation site. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Jul 15;158(2):271–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Broschat K. O., Stidwill R. P., Burgess D. R. Phosphorylation controls brush border motility by regulating myosin structure and association with the cytoskeleton. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(2 Pt 1):561–571. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cande W. Z. A permeabilized cell model for studying cytokinesis using mammalian tissue culture cells. J Cell Biol. 1980 Nov;87(2 Pt 1):326–335. doi: 10.1083/jcb.87.2.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clarke M., Baron A. Myosin filaments in cytoskeletons of Dictyostelium amoebae. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;7(4):293–303. doi: 10.1002/cm.970070402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke M., Spudich J. A. Biochemical and structural studies of actomyosin-like proteins from non-muscle cells. Isolation and characterization of myosin from amoebae of Dictyostelium discoideum. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jun 25;86(2):209–222. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Condeelis J. Isolation of concanavalin A caps during various stages of formation and their association with actin and myosin. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):751–758. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dedman J. R., Welsh M. J., Means A. R. Ca2+-dependent regulator. Production and characterization of a monospecific antibody. J Biol Chem. 1978 Oct 25;253(20):7515–7521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dharmawardhane S., Warren V., Hall A. L., Condeelis J. Changes in the association of actin-binding proteins with the actin cytoskeleton during chemotactic stimulation of Dictyostelium discoideum. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;13(1):57–63. doi: 10.1002/cm.970130107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Egelhoff T. T., Brown S. S., Spudich J. A. Spatial and temporal control of nonmuscle myosin localization: identification of a domain that is necessary for myosin filament disassembly in vivo. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):677–688. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Futrelle R. P., Traut J., McKee W. G. Cell behavior in Dictyostelium discoideum: preaggregation response to localized cyclic AMP pulses. J Cell Biol. 1982 Mar;92(3):807–821. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.3.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giffard R. G., Spudich J. A., Spudich A. Ca2+-sensitive isolation of a cortical actin matrix from Dictyostelium amoebae. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1983 Feb;4(1):115–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00711962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HOFFMANN-BERLING H. Adenosintriphosphat als Betriebsstoff von Zellbewegungen. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1954 Jun;14(2):182–194. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(54)90157-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall A. L., Schlein A., Condeelis J. Relationship of pseudopod extension to chemotactic hormone-induced actin polymerization in amoeboid cells. J Cell Biochem. 1988 Jul;37(3):285–299. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240370304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hellewell S. B., Taylor D. L. The contractile basis of ameboid movement. VI. The solation-contraction coupling hypothesis. J Cell Biol. 1979 Dec;83(3):633–648. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.3.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Holzapfel G., Wehland J., Weber K. Calcium control of actin-myosin based contraction in triton models of mouse 3T3 fibroblasts is mediated by the myosin light chain kinase (MLCK)-calmodulin complex. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Oct;148(1):117–126. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90192-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keller T. C., 3rd, Mooseker M. S. Ca++-calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of myosin, and its role in brush border contraction in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;95(3):943–959. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.3.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kitanishi-Yumura T., Fukui Y. Actomyosin organization during cytokinesis: reversible translocation and differential redistribution in Dictyostelium. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;12(2):78–89. doi: 10.1002/cm.970120203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koretz J. F. Hybridization and reconstitution of thick-filament structure. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):20–55. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kreis T. E., Birchmeier W. Stress fiber sarcomeres of fibroblasts are contractile. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):555–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuczmarski E. R. Partial purification of two myosin heavy chain kinases from Dictyostelium discoideum. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1986 Dec;7(6):501–509. doi: 10.1007/BF01753566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuczmarski E. R., Tafuri S. R., Parysek L. M. Effect of heavy chain phosphorylation on the polymerization and structure of Dictyostelium myosin filaments. J Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;105(6 Pt 2):2989–2997. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.6.2989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Langanger G., Moeremans M., Daneels G., Sobieszek A., De Brabander M., De Mey J. The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):200–209. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lanzetta P. A., Alvarez L. J., Reinach P. S., Candia O. A. An improved assay for nanomole amounts of inorganic phosphate. Anal Biochem. 1979 Nov 15;100(1):95–97. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90115-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lazarides E., Burridge K. Alpha-actinin: immunofluorescent localization of a muscle structural protein in nonmuscle cells. Cell. 1975 Nov;6(3):289–298. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(75)90180-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MOMMAERTS W. F. H. M., PARRISH R. G. Studies on myosin. I. Preparation and criteria of purity. J Biol Chem. 1951 Feb;188(2):545–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mabuchi I., Tsukita S., Tsukita S., Sawai T. Cleavage furrow isolated from newt eggs: contraction, organization of the actin filaments, and protein components of the furrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):5966–5970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahajan R. K., Vaughan K. T., Johns J. A., Pardee J. D. Actin filaments mediate Dictyostelium myosin assembly in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6161–6165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Manstein D. J., Titus M. A., De Lozanne A., Spudich J. A. Gene replacement in Dictyostelium: generation of myosin null mutants. EMBO J. 1989 Mar;8(3):923–932. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Masuda H., Owaribe K., Hatano S. Contraction of triton-treated culture cells. A calcium-sensitive contractile model. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Jan;143(1):79–90. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Masuda H., Owaribe K., Hayashi H., Hatano S. Ca2+-dependent contraction of human lung fibroblasts treated with Triton X-100: a role of Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of myosin 20,000-dalton light chain. Cell Motil. 1984;4(5):315–331. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mornet D., Bertrand R., Pantel P., Audemard E., Kassab R. Structure of the actin-myosin interface. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):301–306. doi: 10.1038/292301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pardee J. D., Spudich J. A. Purification of muscle actin. Methods Enzymol. 1982;85(Pt B):164–181. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)85020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pasternack G. R., Racusen R. H. Erythrocyte protein 4.1 binds and regulates myosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9712–9716. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pasternak C., Spudich J. A., Elson E. L. Capping of surface receptors and concomitant cortical tension are generated by conventional myosin. Nature. 1989 Oct 12;341(6242):549–551. doi: 10.1038/341549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pollard T. D. The role of actin in the temperature-dependent gelation and contraction of extracts of Acanthamoeba. J Cell Biol. 1976 Mar;68(3):579–601. doi: 10.1083/jcb.68.3.579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pollard T. D., Weihing R. R. Actin and myosin and cell movement. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1974 Jan;2(1):1–65. doi: 10.3109/10409237409105443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Read S. M., Northcote D. H. Minimization of variation in the response to different proteins of the Coomassie blue G dye-binding assay for protein. Anal Biochem. 1981 Sep 1;116(1):53–64. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90321-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reedy M. C., Beall C., Fyrberg E. Formation of reverse rigor chevrons by myosin heads. Nature. 1989 Jun 8;339(6224):481–483. doi: 10.1038/339481a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reines D., Clarke M. Immunochemical analysis of the supramolecular structure of myosin in contractile cytoskeletons of Dictyostelium amoebae. J Biol Chem. 1985 Nov 15;260(26):14248–14254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Spudich J. A. Dictyostelium discoideum: methods and perspectives for study of cell motility. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;25(Pt B):359–364. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61433-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Toyoshima Y. Y., Toyoshima C., Spudich J. A. Bidirectional movement of actin filaments along tracks of myosin heads. Nature. 1989 Sep 14;341(6238):154–156. doi: 10.1038/341154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Uyemura D. G., Brown S. S., Spudich J. A. Biochemical and structural characterization of actin from Dictyostelium discoideum. J Biol Chem. 1978 Dec 25;253(24):9088–9096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yumura S., Fukui Y. Reversible cyclic AMP-dependent change in distribution of myosin thick filaments in Dictyostelium. Nature. 1985 Mar 14;314(6007):194–196. doi: 10.1038/314194a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. de Lanerolle P., Adelstein R. S., Feramisco J. R., Burridge K. Characterization of antibodies to smooth muscle myosin kinase and their use in localizing myosin kinase in nonmuscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):4738–4742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES