Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Jan 2;116(2):349–357. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.2.349

Membrane fusion process of Semliki Forest virus. II: Cleavage-dependent reorganization of the spike protein complex controls virus entry

PMCID: PMC2289290  PMID: 1730759

Abstract

The envelope of the Semliki Forest virus (SFV) contains two transmembrane proteins, E2 and E1, in a heterodimeric complex. The E2 subunit is initially synthesized as a precursor protein p62, which is proteolytically processed to the mature E2 form before virus budding at the plasma membrane. The p62 (E2) protein mediates binding of the heterodimer to the nucleocapsid during virus budding, whereas E1 carries the entry functions of the virus, that is, cell binding and low pH-mediated membrane fusion activity. We have investigated the significance of the cleavage event for the maturation and entry of the virus. To express SFV with an uncleaved p62 phenotype, BHK-21 cells were transfected by electroporation with infectious viral RNA transcribed from a full-length SFV cDNA clone in which the p62 cleavage site had been changed. The uncleaved p62E1 heterodimer was found to be used for the formation of virus particles with an efficiency comparable to the wild type E2E1 form. However, in contrast to the wild type virus, the mutant virus was virtually noninfectious. Noninfectivity resulted from impaired uptake into cells, as well as from the inability of the virus to promote membrane fusion in the mildly acidic conditions of the endosome. This inability could be reversed by mild trypsin treatment, which converted the viral p62E1 form into the mature E2E1 form, or by treating the virus with a pH 4.5 wash, which in contrast to the more mild pH conditions of endosomes, effectively disrupted the p62E1 subunit association. We conclude that the p62 cleavage is not needed for virus budding, but regulates entry functions of the E1 subunit by controlling the heterodimer stability in acidic conditions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boere W. A., Harmsen T., Vinjé J., Benaissa-Trouw B. J., Kraaijeveld C. A., Snippe H. Identification of distinct antigenic determinants on Semliki Forest virus by using monoclonal antibodies with different antiviral activities. J Virol. 1984 Nov;52(2):575–582. doi: 10.1128/jvi.52.2.575-582.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boggs W. M., Hahn C. S., Strauss E. G., Strauss J. H., Griffin D. E. Low pH-dependent Sindbis virus-induced fusion of BHK cells: differences between strains correlate with amino acid changes in the E1 glycoprotein. Virology. 1989 Apr;169(2):485–488. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90178-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chamberlain J. P. Fluorographic detection of radioactivity in polyacrylamide gels with the water-soluble fluor, sodium salicylate. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):132–135. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90716-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flynn D. C., Meyer W. J., Mackenzie J. M., Jr, Johnston R. E. A conformational change in Sindbis virus glycoproteins E1 and E2 is detected at the plasma membrane as a consequence of early virus-cell interaction. J Virol. 1990 Aug;64(8):3643–3653. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.8.3643-3653.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garoff H., Simons K. Location of the spike glycoproteins in the Semliki Forest virus membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Oct;71(10):3988–3992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Helenius A., Marsh M., White J. Inhibition of Semliki forest virus penetration by lysosomotropic weak bases. J Gen Virol. 1982 Jan;58(Pt 1):47–61. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-58-1-47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoekstra D., Kok J. W. Entry mechanisms of enveloped viruses. Implications for fusion of intracellular membranes. Biosci Rep. 1989 Jun;9(3):273–305. doi: 10.1007/BF01114682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kielian M. C., Keränen S., Käriäinen L., Helenius A. Membrane fusion mutants of Semliki Forest virus. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):139–145. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kielian M. C., Marsh M., Helenius A. Kinetics of endosome acidification detected by mutant and wild-type Semliki Forest virus. EMBO J. 1986 Dec 1;5(12):3103–3109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04616.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kielian M., Helenius A. pH-induced alterations in the fusogenic spike protein of Semliki Forest virus. J Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;101(6):2284–2291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kielian M., Jungerwirth S. Mechanisms of enveloped virus entry into cells. Mol Biol Med. 1990 Feb;7(1):17–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klenk H. D., Rott R., Orlich M., Blödorn J. Activation of influenza A viruses by trypsin treatment. Virology. 1975 Dec;68(2):426–439. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(75)90284-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liljeström P., Lusa S., Huylebroeck D., Garoff H. In vitro mutagenesis of a full-length cDNA clone of Semliki Forest virus: the small 6,000-molecular-weight membrane protein modulates virus release. J Virol. 1991 Aug;65(8):4107–4113. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.8.4107-4113.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lobigs M., Garoff H. Fusion function of the Semliki Forest virus spike is activated by proteolytic cleavage of the envelope glycoprotein precursor p62. J Virol. 1990 Mar;64(3):1233–1240. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.3.1233-1240.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lobigs M., Wahlberg J. M., Garoff H. Spike protein oligomerization control of Semliki Forest virus fusion. J Virol. 1990 Oct;64(10):5214–5218. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.10.5214-5218.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lobigs M., Zhao H. X., Garoff H. Function of Semliki Forest virus E3 peptide in virus assembly: replacement of E3 with an artificial signal peptide abolishes spike heterodimerization and surface expression of E1. J Virol. 1990 Sep;64(9):4346–4355. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.9.4346-4355.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marsh M., Helenius A. Virus entry into animal cells. Adv Virus Res. 1989;36:107–151. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60583-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Metsikkö K., Garoff H. Oligomers of the cytoplasmic domain of the p62/E2 membrane protein of Semliki Forest virus bind to the nucleocapsid in vitro. J Virol. 1990 Oct;64(10):4678–4683. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.10.4678-4683.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moore J. P., McKeating J. A., Weiss R. A., Sattentau Q. J. Dissociation of gp120 from HIV-1 virions induced by soluble CD4. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1139–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.2251501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Omar A., Koblet H. Semliki Forest virus particles containing only the E1 envelope glycoprotein are infectious and can induce cell-cell fusion. Virology. 1988 Sep;166(1):17–23. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park J. E., Lopez J. M., Cluett E. B., Brown W. J. Identification of a membrane glycoprotein found primarily in the prelysosomal endosome compartment. J Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;112(2):245–255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.2.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pettersson R. F. Protein localization and virus assembly at intracellular membranes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1991;170:67–106. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76389-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Presely J. F., Brown D. T. The proteolytic cleavage of PE2 to envelope glycoprotein E2 is not strictly required for the maturation of Sindbis virus. J Virol. 1989 May;63(5):1975–1980. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.5.1975-1980.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Russell D. L., Dalrymple J. M., Johnston R. E. Sindbis virus mutations which coordinately affect glycoprotein processing, penetration, and virulence in mice. J Virol. 1989 Apr;63(4):1619–1629. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.4.1619-1629.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schmid S., Fuchs R., Kielian M., Helenius A., Mellman I. Acidification of endosome subpopulations in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells and temperature-sensitive acidification-defective mutants. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1291–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Simons K., Garoff H. The budding mechanisms of enveloped animal viruses. J Gen Virol. 1980 Sep;50(1):1–21. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stegmann T., Doms R. W., Helenius A. Protein-mediated membrane fusion. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:187–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.001155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stegmann T., White J. M., Helenius A. Intermediates in influenza induced membrane fusion. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4231–4241. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07871.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vaux D. J., Helenius A., Mellman I. Spike--nucleocapsid interaction in Semliki Forest virus reconstructed using network antibodies. Nature. 1988 Nov 3;336(6194):36–42. doi: 10.1038/336036a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wahlberg J. M., Boere W. A., Garoff H. The heterodimeric association between the membrane proteins of Semliki Forest virus changes its sensitivity to low pH during virus maturation. J Virol. 1989 Dec;63(12):4991–4997. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.12.4991-4997.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wahlberg J. M., Garoff H. Membrane fusion process of Semliki Forest virus. I: Low pH-induced rearrangement in spike protein quaternary structure precedes virus penetration into cells. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;116(2):339–348. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wellink J., van Kammen A. Proteases involved in the processing of viral polyproteins. Brief review. Arch Virol. 1988;98(1-2):1–26. doi: 10.1007/BF01321002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. White J. M. Viral and cellular membrane fusion proteins. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:675–697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.003331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. White J., Kartenbeck J., Helenius A. Fusion of Semliki forest virus with the plasma membrane can be induced by low pH. J Cell Biol. 1980 Oct;87(1):264–272. doi: 10.1083/jcb.87.1.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziemiecki A., Garoff H., Simons K. Formation of the Semliki Forest virus membrane glycoprotein complexes in the infected cell. J Gen Virol. 1980 Sep;50(1):111–123. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-1-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. de Curtis I., Simons K. Dissection of Semliki Forest virus glycoprotein delivery from the trans-Golgi network to the cell surface in permeabilized BHK cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8052–8056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES