Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Feb 2;116(4):1055–1062. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.4.1055

The hyaluronan receptor (CD44) participates in the uptake and degradation of hyaluronan

PMCID: PMC2289343  PMID: 1370836

Abstract

The hyaluronan receptor belongs to the polymorphic family of CD44 glycoproteins, which have been implicated in a variety of cellular functions including adhesion to hyaluronan and collagen, the binding of lymphocytes to high endothelial cells during extravasation, and conferring metastatic potential to carcinoma cells. Here, we demonstrate that the receptor also participates in the uptake and degradation of hyaluronan by both transformed fibroblasts (SV-3T3 cells) and alveolar macrophages. These cells were incubated with isotopically labeled hyaluronan for various periods of time, and the extent of degradation was determined by either molecular-sieve chromatography or centrifugation through Centricon 30 microconcentrators. The macrophages degraded the hyaluronan at a faster rate than the SV-3T3 cells, which may reflect the fact that they contained a greater number of receptors. More importantly, in both cell types, the degradation of hyaluronan was specifically blocked by antibodies directed against the receptor. However, the receptor by itself did not have the ability to degrade hyaluronan, since preparations of SV-3T3 membranes containing the receptor did not break down hyaluronan. Subsequent experiments revealed that macrophages can internalize fluorescein-tagged hyaluronan, and this process was blocked by antibodies against the receptor. Furthermore, the subsequent degradation of hyaluronan was inhibited by agents that block the acidification of lysosomes (chloroquine and NH4Cl). Thus, the most likely explanation for these results is that the receptor mediates the uptake of hyaluronan into the cell where it can be degraded by acid hydrolases in lysosomes. The ability of cells expressing the receptor to degrade hyaluronan may be important during tissue morphogenesis and cell migration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (907.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alho A. M., Underhill C. B. The hyaluronate receptor is preferentially expressed on proliferating epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1557–1565. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aruffo A., Stamenkovic I., Melnick M., Underhill C. B., Seed B. CD44 is the principal cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1303–1313. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90694-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BITTER T., MUIR H. M. A modified uronic acid carbazole reaction. Anal Biochem. 1962 Oct;4:330–334. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(62)90095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Culty M., Miyake K., Kincade P. W., Sikorski E., Butcher E. C., Underhill C., Silorski E. The hyaluronate receptor is a member of the CD44 (H-CAM) family of cell surface glycoproteins. J Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;111(6 Pt 1):2765–2774. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser J. R., Kimpton W. G., Laurent T. C., Cahill R. N., Vakakis N. Uptake and degradation of hyaluronan in lymphatic tissue. Biochem J. 1988 Nov 15;256(1):153–158. doi: 10.1042/bj2560153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser J. R., Laurent T. C. Turnover and metabolism of hyaluronan. Ciba Found Symp. 1989;143:41-53; discussion 53-9, 281-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S., Anderson R. G., Russell D. W., Schneider W. J. Receptor-mediated endocytosis: concepts emerging from the LDL receptor system. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:1–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green S. J., Tarone G., Underhill C. B. Aggregation of macrophages and fibroblasts is inhibited by a monoclonal antibody to the hyaluronate receptor. Exp Cell Res. 1988 Oct;178(2):224–232. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(88)90393-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Green S. J., Tarone G., Underhill C. B. Distribution of hyaluronate and hyaluronate receptors in the adult lung. J Cell Sci. 1988 May;90(Pt 1):145–156. doi: 10.1242/jcs.90.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Günthert U., Hofmann M., Rudy W., Reber S., Zöller M., Haussmann I., Matzku S., Wenzel A., Ponta H., Herrlich P. A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells. Cell. 1991 Apr 5;65(1):13–24. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90403-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jalkanen S., Bargatze R. F., de los Toyos J., Butcher E. C. Lymphocyte recognition of high endothelium: antibodies to distinct epitopes of an 85-95-kD glycoprotein antigen differentially inhibit lymphocyte binding to lymph node, mucosal, or synovial endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):983–990. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalomiris E. L., Bourguignon L. Y. Mouse T lymphoma cells contain a transmembrane glycoprotein (GP85) that binds ankyrin. J Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;106(2):319–327. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.2.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lacy B. E., Underhill C. B. The hyaluronate receptor is associated with actin filaments. J Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;105(3):1395–1404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laurent T. C., Fraser J. R., Pertoft H., Smedsrød B. Binding of hyaluronate and chondroitin sulphate to liver endothelial cells. Biochem J. 1986 Mar 15;234(3):653–658. doi: 10.1042/bj2340653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lesley J., Schulte R., Hyman R. Binding of hyaluronic acid to lymphoid cell lines is inhibited by monoclonal antibodies against Pgp-1. Exp Cell Res. 1990 Apr;187(2):224–233. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(90)90085-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McGuire P. G., Castellot J. J., Jr, Orkin R. W. Size-dependent hyaluronate degradation by cultured cells. J Cell Physiol. 1987 Nov;133(2):267–276. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041330210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mellman I., Fuchs R., Helenius A. Acidification of the endocytic and exocytic pathways. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:663–700. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.003311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miyake K., Underhill C. B., Lesley J., Kincade P. W. Hyaluronate can function as a cell adhesion molecule and CD44 participates in hyaluronate recognition. J Exp Med. 1990 Jul 1;172(1):69–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakache M., Berg E. L., Streeter P. R., Butcher E. C. The mucosal vascular addressin is a tissue-specific endothelial cell adhesion molecule for circulating lymphocytes. Nature. 1989 Jan 12;337(6203):179–181. doi: 10.1038/337179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Orkin R. W., Toole B. P. Isolation and characterization of hyaluronidase from cultures of chick embryo skin- and muscle-derived fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 10;255(3):1036–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Orkin R. W., Underhill C. B., Toole B. P. Hyaluronate degradation in 3T3 and simian virus-transformed 3T3 cells. J Biol Chem. 1982 May 25;257(10):5821–5826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Raja R. H., McGary C. T., Weigel P. H. Affinity and distribution of surface and intracellular hyaluronic acid receptors in isolated rat liver endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 15;263(32):16661–16668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rodén L., Campbell P., Fraser J. R., Laurent T. C., Pertoft H., Thompson J. N. Enzymic pathways of hyaluronan catabolism. Ciba Found Symp. 1989;143:60-76; discussion 76-86, 281-5. doi: 10.1002/9780470513774.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stamenkovic I., Amiot M., Pesando J. M., Seed B. A lymphocyte molecule implicated in lymph node homing is a member of the cartilage link protein family. Cell. 1989 Mar 24;56(6):1057–1062. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90638-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Steinman R. M., Nussenzweig M. C. Dendritic cells: features and functions. Immunol Rev. 1980;53:127–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1980.tb01042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Streeter P. R., Berg E. L., Rouse B. T., Bargatze R. F., Butcher E. C. A tissue-specific endothelial cell molecule involved in lymphocyte homing. Nature. 1988 Jan 7;331(6151):41–46. doi: 10.1038/331041a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Underhill C. B., Chi-Rosso G., Toole B. P. Effects of detergent solubilization on the hyaluronate-binding protein from membranes of simian virus 40-transformed 3T3 cells. J Biol Chem. 1983 Jul 10;258(13):8086–8091. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Underhill C. B., Green S. J., Comoglio P. M., Tarone G. The hyaluronate receptor is identical to a glycoprotein of Mr 85,000 (gp85) as shown by a monoclonal antibody that interferes with binding activity. J Biol Chem. 1987 Sep 25;262(27):13142–13146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Underhill C. B. Interaction of hyaluronate with the surface of simian virus 40-transformed 3T3 cells: aggregation and binding studies. J Cell Sci. 1982 Aug;56:177–189. doi: 10.1242/jcs.56.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Underhill C. B. The interaction of hyaluronate with the cell surface: the hyaluronate receptor and the core protein. Ciba Found Symp. 1989;143:87-99; discussion 100-6, 281-5. doi: 10.1002/9780470513774.ch6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Underhill C. B., Thurn A. L., Lacy B. E. Characterization and identification of the hyaluronate binding site from membranes of SV-3T3 cells. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jul 5;260(13):8128–8133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Underhill C. B., Toole B. P. Binding of hyaluronate to the surface of cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1979 Aug;82(2):475–484. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.2.475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Underhill C. B., Toole B. P. Physical characteristics of hyaluronate binding to the surface of simian virus 40-transformed 3T3 cells. J Biol Chem. 1980 May 25;255(10):4544–4549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Underhill C. B., Toole B. P. Receptors for hyaluronate on the surface of parent and virus-transformed cell lines: binding and aggregation studies. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Feb;131(2):419–423. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Underhill C., Dorfman A. The role of hyaluronic acid in intercellular adhesion of cultured mouse cells. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Nov;117(1):155–164. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Updyke T. V., Nicolson G. L. Immunoaffinity isolation of membrane antigens with biotinylated monoclonal antibodies and streptavidin-agarose. Methods Enzymol. 1986;121:717–725. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)21070-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. de Duve C. Lysosomes revisited. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Dec 15;137(3):391–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. de Duve C., de Barsy T., Poole B., Trouet A., Tulkens P., Van Hoof F. Commentary. Lysosomotropic agents. Biochem Pharmacol. 1974 Sep 15;23(18):2495–2531. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(74)90174-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES