Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Mar 1;116(5):1231–1241. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1231

The plus ends of stable microtubules are the exclusive nucleating structures for microtubules in the axon

PMCID: PMC2289361  PMID: 1740474

Abstract

Microtubules (MTs) in the axon have a uniform polarity orientation that is recapitulated during recovery from episodes of MT depolymerization (Heidemann, S. R., M. A. Hamborg, S. J. Thomas, B. Song, S. Lindley, and D. Chu. 1984. J. Cell Biol. 99:1289-1295). This tight regulation of their organization indicates that axonal MTs are spatially regulated by discrete nucleating structures comparable in function to the centrosome. Several authors have proposed that an especially stable class of MTs in the axon may serve as these nucleating structures. In a previous report (Baas, P. W., and M. M. Black. 1990. J. Cell Biol. 111:495-509), we determined that the axons of cultured sympathetic neurons contain two classes of MT polymer, stable and labile, that differ in their sensitivity to nocodazole by roughly 35-fold. The stable and labile polymer represent long-lived and recently assembled polymer, respectively. We also determined that these two classes of polymer can be visually distinguished at the immunoelectron microscopic level based on their content of tyrosinated alpha-tubulin: the labile polymer stains densely, while the stable polymer does not stain. In the present study, we have taken advantage of these observations to directly identify MT nucleating structures in the axon. Neuron cultures were treated with nocodazole for 6 h to completely depolymerize the labile polymer in the axon, and substantially shorten the stable polymer. The cultures were then rinsed free of the drug, permitted to reassemble polymer for various periods of time, and prepared for immunoelectron microscopic localization of tyrosinated alpha-tubulin. Serial reconstruction of consecutive thin sections was undertaken to determine the spatial relationship between the stable MTs and the newly assembled polymer. All of the new polymer assembled in direct continuity with the plus ends of stable MTs, indicating that these ends are assembly competent, and hence capable of acting as nucleating structures. Our results further indicate that no self-assembly of MTs occurs in the axon, nor do any MT nucleating structures exist in the axon other than the plus ends of stable MTs. Thus the plus ends of stable MTs are the exclusive nucleating structures for MTs in the axon.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arregui C., Busciglio J., Caceres A., Barra H. S. Tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules in axonal processes of cerebellar macroneurons grown in culture. J Neurosci Res. 1991 Feb;28(2):171–181. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490280204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baas P. W., Black M. M., Banker G. A. Changes in microtubule polarity orientation during the development of hippocampal neurons in culture. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):3085–3094. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baas P. W., Black M. M. Individual microtubules in the axon consist of domains that differ in both composition and stability. J Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;111(2):495–509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.2.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baas P. W., Deitch J. S., Black M. M., Banker G. A. Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8335–8339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baas P. W., Heidemann S. R. Microtubule reassembly from nucleating fragments during the regrowth of amputated neurites. J Cell Biol. 1986 Sep;103(3):917–927. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.3.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baas P. W., Slaughter T., Brown A., Black M. M. Microtubule dynamics in axons and dendrites. J Neurosci Res. 1991 Sep;30(1):134–153. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490300115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baas P. W., White L. A., Heidemann S. R. Microtubule polarity reversal accompanies regrowth of amputated neurites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5272–5276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bamburg J. R., Bray D., Chapman K. Assembly of microtubules at the tip of growing axons. Nature. 1986 Jun 19;321(6072):788–790. doi: 10.1038/321788a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscope analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):141–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Binder L. I., Dentler W. L., Rosenbaum J. L. Assembly of chick brain tubulin onto flagellar microtubules from Chlamydomonas and sea urchin sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Mar;72(3):1122–1126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.3.1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Black M. M., Baas P. W. The basis of polarity in neurons. Trends Neurosci. 1989 Jun;12(6):211–214. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Black M. M., Cochran J. M., Kurdyla J. T. Solubility properties of neuronal tubulin: evidence for labile and stable microtubules. Brain Res. 1984 Mar 19;295(2):255–263. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90974-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Black M. M., Lasek R. J. Slow components of axonal transport: two cytoskeletal networks. J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):616–623. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brady S. T., Tytell M., Lasek R. J. Axonal tubulin and axonal microtubules: biochemical evidence for cold stability. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1716–1724. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bray D., Bunge M. B. Serial analysis of microtubules in cultured rat sensory axons. J Neurocytol. 1981 Aug;10(4):589–605. doi: 10.1007/BF01262592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brinkley B. R. Microtubule organizing centers. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:145–172. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bré M. H., Karsenti E. Effects of brain microtubule-associated proteins on microtubule dynamics and the nucleating activity of centrosomes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1990;15(2):88–98. doi: 10.1002/cm.970150205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bulinski J. C., Richards J. E., Piperno G. Posttranslational modifications of alpha tubulin: detyrosination and acetylation differentiate populations of interphase microtubules in cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1213–1220. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Burton P. R., Paige J. L. Polarity of axoplasmic microtubules in the olfactory nerve of the frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May;78(5):3269–3273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.5.3269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Brabander M., Geuens G., Van De Veire R., Thoneé F., Aerts F., Desplenter L., De Cree J., Borgers M. The effects of R U7934 (NSC 238159), a new antimicrotubular substance, on the ultrastructure of neoplastic cells in vivo. Eur J Cancer. 1977 Jun;13(6):511–528. doi: 10.1016/0014-2964(77)90113-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Drubin D. G., Kirschner M. W. Tau protein function in living cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2739–2746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gard D. L., Kirschner M. W. Microtubule assembly in cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2191–2201. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gundersen G. G., Khawaja S., Bulinski J. C. Postpolymerization detyrosination of alpha-tubulin: a mechanism for subcellular differentiation of microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):251–264. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Haimo L. T., Telzer B. R., Rosenbaum J. L. Dynein binds to and crossbridges cytoplasmic microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5759–5763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heidemann S. R., Hamborg M. A., Thomas S. J., Song B., Lindley S., Chu D. Spatial organization of axonal microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1289–1295. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Heidemann S. R., Landers J. M., Hamborg M. A. Polarity orientation of axonal microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 1):661–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Heidemann S. R., McIntosh J. R. Visualization of the structural polarity of microtubules. Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):517–519. doi: 10.1038/286517a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heidemann S. R. Microtubule polarity determination based on formation of protofilament hooks. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:469–477. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Joshi H. C., Baas P., Chu D. T., Heidemann S. R. The cytoskeleton of neurites after microtubule depolymerization. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Mar;163(1):233–245. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90576-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Keith C. H. Neurite elongation is blocked if microtubule polymerization is inhibited in PC12 cells. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1990;17(2):95–105. doi: 10.1002/cm.970170205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Khawaja S., Gundersen G. G., Bulinski J. C. Enhanced stability of microtubules enriched in detyrosinated tubulin is not a direct function of detyrosination level. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jan;106(1):141–149. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):576–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kirschner M. W. Microtubule assembly and nucleation. Int Rev Cytol. 1978;54:1–71. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60164-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lasek R. J. Translocation of the neuronal cytoskeleton and axonal locomotion. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1095):313–327. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim S. S., Edson K. J., Letourneau P. C., Borisy G. G. A test of microtubule translocation during neurite elongation. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):123–130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lim S. S., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Progressive and spatially differentiated stability of microtubules in developing neuronal cells. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):253–263. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyser K. M. An electron-microscopic study of centrioles in differentiating motor neuroblasts. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1968 Nov;20(3):343–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Margolis R. L., Rauch C. T., Job D. Purification and assay of a 145-kDa protein (STOP145) with microtubule-stabilizing and motility behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(3):639–643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Margolis R. L., Rauch C. T., Pirollet F., Job D. Specific association of STOP protein with microtubules in vitro and with stable microtubules in mitotic spindles of cultured cells. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(12):4095–4102. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07631.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McBeath E., Fujiwara K. Microtubule detachment from the microtubule-organizing center as a key event in the complete turnover of microtubules in cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;52(1):1–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron. 1988 Nov;1(9):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Morris J. R., Lasek R. J. Monomer-polymer equilibria in the axon: direct measurement of tubulin and actin as polymer and monomer in axoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2064–2076. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Okabe S., Hirokawa N. Microtubule dynamics in nerve cells: analysis using microinjection of biotinylated tubulin into PC12 cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Aug;107(2):651–664. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.2.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Okabe S., Hirokawa N. Turnover of fluorescently labelled tubulin and actin in the axon. Nature. 1990 Feb 1;343(6257):479–482. doi: 10.1038/343479a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reinsch S. S., Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. Microtubule polymer assembly and transport during axonal elongation. J Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;115(2):365–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.2.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Robson S. J., Burgoyne R. D. Differential localisation of tyrosinated, detyrosinated, and acetylated alpha-tubulins in neurites and growth cones of dorsal root ganglion neurons. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;12(4):273–282. doi: 10.1002/cm.970120408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sahenk Z., Brady S. T. Axonal tubulin and microtubules: morphologic evidence for stable regions on axonal microtubules. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8(2):155–164. doi: 10.1002/cm.970080207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1020–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharp G. A., Weber K., Osborn M. Centriole number and process formation in established neuroblastoma cells and primary dorsal root ganglion neurones. Eur J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;29(1):97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Suprenant K. A. Unidirectional microtubule assembly in cell-free extracts of Spisula solidissima oocytes is regulated by subtle changes in pH. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;19(3):207–220. doi: 10.1002/cm.970190308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Webster D. R., Gundersen G. G., Bulinski J. C., Borisy G. G. Differential turnover of tyrosinated and detyrosinated microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9040–9044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wehland J., Willingham M. C. A rat monoclonal antibody reacting specifically with the tyrosylated form of alpha-tubulin. II. Effects on cell movement, organization of microtubules, and intermediate filaments, and arrangement of Golgi elements. J Cell Biol. 1983 Nov;97(5 Pt 1):1476–1490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.5.1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES