Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 Apr;34(4):995–998. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.4.995-998.1996

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by Amplicor PCR: comparison of diagnostic performance with urine and cervical specimens.

R Pasternack 1, P Vuorinen 1, A Kuukankorpi 1, T Pitkäjärvi 1, A Miettinen 1
PMCID: PMC228938  PMID: 8815129

Abstract

We used the Roche Amplicor PCR assay to compare urine and cervical swabs as sample material in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis causing genital infections. The diagnostic performance of Amplicor PCR was compared with that of cell culture and the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay with cervical specimens. If discrepant from other results, the specimens negative by PCR were diluted and reanalyzed to reveal PCR inhibitors. Of 666 patients, 39 (5.9%) were confirmed to have chlamydial infection. The respective sensitivity and specificity of Amplicor PCR were as follows: urine specimens, 82.0 and 99.7%; cervical specimens, 82.0 and 99.8%. Those for cell culture with cervical specimens were 84.6 and 100%. For the Gen-Probe PACE 2 assay, the sensitivity and specificity with cervical specimens were 79.5 and 100%, respectively. Without the effect of PCR inhibitors, the sensitivity of PCR with urine would have been 97.4%. Provided that the problems currently caused by inhibitors will be solved, the Amplicor PCR assay with urine specimens offers a tempting alternative for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis infection in women.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bass C. A., Jungkind D. L., Silverman N. S., Bondi J. M. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2648–2653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2648-2653.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Loeffelholz M. J., Herman S. A., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3013–3016. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3013-3016.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauwens J. E., Clark A. M., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3023–3027. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3023-3027.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutilh B., Bébéar C., Rodriguez P., Vekris A., Bonnet J., Garret M. Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989 Jan;140(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaschek G., Gaydos C. A., Welsh L. E., Quinn T. C. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1209–1212. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1209-1212.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee H. H., Chernesky M. A., Schachter J., Burczak J. D., Andrews W. W., Muldoon S., Leckie G., Stamm W. E. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine. Lancet. 1995 Jan 28;345(8944):213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mårdh P. A., Weström L., Colleen S., Wølner-Hanssen P. Sampling, specimen handling, and isolation techniques in the diagnosis of Chlamydial and other genital infections. Sex Transm Dis. 1981 Oct-Dec;8(4):280–285. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198110000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paavonen J., Vesterinen E. Chlamydia trachomatis in cervicitis and urethritis in women. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1982;32:45–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ripa K. T., Mårdh P. A. Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Oct;6(4):328–331. doi: 10.1128/jcm.6.4.328-331.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Skulnick M., Chua R., Simor A. E., Low D. E., Khosid H. E., Fraser S., Lyons E., Legere E. A., Kitching D. A. Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical and urine specimens in an asymptomatic low-prevalence population of women. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Dec;20(4):195–201. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thejls H., Gnarpe J., Gnarpe H., Larsson P. G., Platz-Christensen J. J., Ostergaard L., Victor A. Expanded gold standard in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a low prevalence population: diagnostic efficacy of tissue culture, direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, PCR and serology. Genitourin Med. 1994 Oct;70(5):300–303. doi: 10.1136/sti.70.5.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wiesenfeld H. C., Uhrin M., Dixon B. W., Sweet R. L. Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Sep-Oct;21(5):268–271. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199409000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES