Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Aug 1;118(3):655–661. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.3.655

A cytomechanical investigation of neurite growth on different culture surfaces

PMCID: PMC2289549  PMID: 1639849

Abstract

We have examined the relationship between tension, an intrinsic stimulator of axonal elongation, and the culture substrate, an extrinsic regulator of axonal elongation. Chick sensory neurons were cultured on three substrata: (a) plain tissue culture plastic; (b) plastic treated with collagen type IV; and (c) plastic treated with laminin. Calibrated glass needles were used to increase the tension loads on growing neurites. We found that growth cones on all substrata failed to detach when subjected to two to threefold and in some cases 5- 10-fold greater tensions than their self-imposed rest tension. We conclude that adhesion to the substrate does not limit the tension exerted by growth cones. These data argue against a "tug-of-war" model for substrate-mediated guidance of growth cones. Neurite elongation was experimentally induced by towing neurites with a force-calibrated glass needle. On all substrata, towed elongation rate was proportional to applied tension above a threshold tension. The proportionality between elongation rate and tension can be regarded as the growth sensitivity of the neurite to tension, i.e., its growth rate per unit tension. On this basis, towed growth on all substrata can be described by the simple linear equation: elongation rate = sensitivity x (applied tension - tension threshold) The numerical values of tension thresholds and neurite sensitivities varied widely among different neurites. On all substrata, thresholds varied from near zero to greater than 200 mudynes, with some tendency for thresholds to cluster between 100 and 150 mudynes. Similarly, the tension sensitivity of neurites varied between 0.5 and 5.0 microns/h/mudyne. The lack of significant differences among sensitivity or threshold values on the various substrata suggest to use that the substratum does not affect the internal "set points" of the neurite for its response to tension. The growth cone of chick sensory neurons is known to pull on its neurite. The simplest cytomechanical model would assume that both growth cone- mediated elongation and towed growth are identical as far as tension input and elongation rate are concerned. We used the equation above and mean values for thresholds and sensitivity from towing experiments to predict the mean growth cone-mediated elongation rate based on mean rest tensions. These predictions are consistent with the observed mean values.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (812.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bixby J. L. Protein kinase C is involved in laminin stimulation of neurite outgrowth. Neuron. 1989 Sep;3(3):287–297. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90253-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bray D. Axonal growth in response to experimentally applied mechanical tension. Dev Biol. 1984 Apr;102(2):379–389. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90202-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bray D., Bunge M. B., Chapman K. Geometry of isolated sensory neurons in culture. Effects of embryonic age and culture substratum. Exp Cell Res. 1987 Jan;168(1):127–137. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(87)90422-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buettner H. M., Pittman R. N. Quantitative effects of laminin concentration on neurite outgrowth in vitro. Dev Biol. 1991 Jun;145(2):266–276. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(91)90125-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burmeister D. W., Goldberg D. J. Micropruning: the mechanism of turning of Aplysia growth cones at substrate borders in vitro. J Neurosci. 1988 Sep;8(9):3151–3159. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-09-03151.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buxbaum R. E., Heidemann S. R. An absolute rate theory model for tension control of axonal elongation. J Theor Biol. 1992 Apr 21;155(4):409–426. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80626-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Caudy M., Bentley D. Pioneer growth cone morphologies reveal proximal increases in substrate affinity within leg segments of grasshopper embryos. J Neurosci. 1986 Feb;6(2):364–379. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-02-00364.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins F. Induction of neurite outgrowth by a conditioned-medium factor bound to the culture substratum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):5210–5213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.5210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Danilov Y. N., Juliano R. L. Phorbol ester modulation of integrin-mediated cell adhesion: a postreceptor event. J Cell Biol. 1989 May;108(5):1925–1933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.5.1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis G. E., Manthorpe M., Varon S. Parameters of neuritic growth from ciliary ganglion neurons in vitro: influence of laminin, schwannoma polyornithine-binding neurite promoting factor and ciliary neuronotrophic factor. Brain Res. 1985 Jan;349(1-2):75–84. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(85)90133-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dennerll T. J., Joshi H. C., Steel V. L., Buxbaum R. E., Heidemann S. R. Tension and compression in the cytoskeleton of PC-12 neurites. II: Quantitative measurements. J Cell Biol. 1988 Aug;107(2):665–674. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.2.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dennerll T. J., Lamoureux P., Buxbaum R. E., Heidemann S. R. The cytomechanics of axonal elongation and retraction. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):3073–3083. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gundersen R. W. Interference reflection microscopic study of dorsal root growth cones on different substrates: assessment of growth cone-substrate contacts. J Neurosci Res. 1988 Oct-Dec;21(2-4):298–306. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490210222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gundersen R. W. Response of sensory neurites and growth cones to patterned substrata of laminin and fibronectin in vitro. Dev Biol. 1987 Jun;121(2):423–431. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hantaz-Ambroise D., Vigny M., Koenig J. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan and laminin mediate two different types of neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci. 1987 Aug;7(8):2293–2304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heidemann S. R., Lamoureux P., Buxbaum R. E. Growth cone behavior and production of traction force. J Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;111(5 Pt 1):1949–1957. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.5.1949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz M. J., George E. B., Gilbert L. J. Axonal elongation as a stochastic walk. Cell Motil. 1984;4(5):351–370. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kleitman N., Johnson M. I. Rapid growth cone translocation on laminin is supported by lamellipodial not filopodial structures. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1989;13(4):288–300. doi: 10.1002/cm.970130407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lamoureux P., Buxbaum R. E., Heidemann S. R. Direct evidence that growth cones pull. Nature. 1989 Jul 13;340(6229):159–162. doi: 10.1038/340159a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Letourneau P. C. Cell-to-substratum adhesion and guidance of axonal elongation. Dev Biol. 1975 May;44(1):92–101. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90379-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ludueña M. A. Nerve cell differentiation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1973 Aug;33(2):268–284. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(73)90137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McKenna M. P., Raper J. A. Growth cone behavior on gradients of substratum bound laminin. Dev Biol. 1988 Nov;130(1):232–236. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90429-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nardi J. B. Neuronal pathfinding in developing wings of the moth Manduca sexta. Dev Biol. 1983 Jan;95(1):163–174. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Reichardt L. F., Bixby J. L., Hall D. E., Ignatius M. J., Neugebauer K. M., Tomaselli K. J. Integrins and cell adhesion molecules: neuronal receptors that regulate axon growth on extracellular matrices and cell surfaces. Dev Neurosci. 1989;11(4-5):332–347. doi: 10.1159/000111910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanes J. R. Extracellular matrix molecules that influence neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:491–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schuch U., Lohse M. J., Schachner M. Neural cell adhesion molecules influence second messenger systems. Neuron. 1989 Jul;3(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90111-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sinclair G. I., Baas P. W., Heidemann S. R. Role of microtubules in the cytoplasmic compartmentation of neurons. II. Endocytosis in the growth cone and neurite shaft. Brain Res. 1988 May 31;450(1-2):60–68. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91544-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smalheiser N. R., Crain S. M., Reid L. M. Laminin as a substrate for retinal axons in vitro. Brain Res. 1984 Jan;314(1):136–140. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(84)90184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taghert P. H., Bastiani M. J., Ho R. K., Goodman C. S. Guidance of pioneer growth cones: filopodial contacts and coupling revealed with an antibody to Lucifer Yellow. Dev Biol. 1982 Dec;94(2):391–399. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(82)90356-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thomas W. A., Schaefer A. W., Treadway R. M., Jr Galactosyl transferase-dependence of neurite outgrowth on substratum-bound laminin. Development. 1990 Dec;110(4):1101–1114. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.4.1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zheng J., Lamoureux P., Santiago V., Dennerll T., Buxbaum R. E., Heidemann S. R. Tensile regulation of axonal elongation and initiation. J Neurosci. 1991 Apr;11(4):1117–1125. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-04-01117.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES