Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1996 May;34(5):1065–1068. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1065-1068.1996

Evaluation of Amplicor MTB test as adjunct to smears and culture for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the French Caribbean.

A Devallois 1, E Legrand 1, N Rastogi 1
PMCID: PMC228955  PMID: 8727876

Abstract

A total of 784 specimens collected from 370 individuals between January and August 1995 were analyzed by using the Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test (Roche Diagnostic System, Basel, Switzerland), a PCR-based test for the direct detection of organisms of the M. tuberculosis complex. The PCR results were compared with standard bacteriological data, including those obtained by acid-fast microscopy, culture, and biochemical identification as well as final clinical diagnosis for each patient. Several parallel controls were used: the kit DNA positive control, 10(3) CFU of M. tuberculosis, and three negative controls for each independent assay. No false-positive PCR results were obtained, and overall, M. tuberculosis was detected in 20 of 370 individuals screened. Five additional patients during the same time were found to be infected with mycobacteria other than tubercle bacilli; their specimens gave positive smear and/or culture test results, but Amplicor tests were always negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the Amplicor MTB test compared with culture per specimen were 76.7, 97.7, 66.0, and 98.6%, respectively. For resolved cases, these values were, respectively, 69.4, 100, 100, and 96.8%; however, the sensitivity and negative predictive value increased to 90.9 and 99.2%, respectively, if PCR-negative nonrespiratory specimens (gastric washings) were not considered. When only specimens from proven tuberculosis patients were considered (n = 114) and the sum of PCR-positive and/or culture-positive samples from proven tuberculosis patients was considered the total number of positive samples, PCR had a sensitivity of 83.3% compared with 71.6% for culture. Results per patient (about three samples each) yielded 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. We conclude that the Amplicor MTB test is highly specific and rapid for routine use in a clinical laboratory. However, in order to obtain a higher degree of sensitivity, it should be run as an adjunct to smears and culture with at least three samples for each patient, and a single-sample PCR-negative results must be considered carefully because of potential false-negatives.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe C., Hirano K., Wada M., Kazumi Y., Takahashi M., Fukasawa Y., Yoshimura T., Miyagi C., Goto S. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3270–3274. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3270-3274.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brisson-Noel A., Aznar C., Chureau C., Nguyen S., Pierre C., Bartoli M., Bonete R., Pialoux G., Gicquel B., Garrigue G. Diagnosis of tuberculosis by DNA amplification in clinical practice evaluation. Lancet. 1991 Aug 10;338(8763):364–366. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90492-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Böddinghaus B., Rogall T., Flohr T., Blöcker H., Böttger E. C. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Aug;28(8):1751–1759. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.8.1751-1759.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cousins D. V., Wilton S. D., Francis B. R., Gow B. L. Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):255–258. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.255-258.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. D'Amato R. F., Wallman A. A., Hochstein L. H., Colaninno P. M., Scardamaglia M., Ardila E., Ghouri M., Kim K., Patel R. C., Miller A. Rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by using Roche AMPLICOR Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR test. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1832–1834. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1832-1834.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisenach K. D., Sifford M. D., Cave M. D., Bates J. H., Crawford J. T. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1160–1163. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.5.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hermans P. W., Schuitema A. R., Van Soolingen D., Verstynen C. P., Bik E. M., Thole J. E., Kolk A. H., van Embden J. D. Specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1204–1213. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1204-1213.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jonas V., Alden M. J., Curry J. I., Kamisango K., Knott C. A., Lankford R., Wolfe J. M., Moore D. F. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Sep;31(9):2410–2416. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.9.2410-2416.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kennedy N., Gillespie S. H., Saruni A. O., Kisyombe G., McNerney R., Ngowi F. I., Wilson S. Polymerase chain reaction for assessing treatment response in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 1994 Sep;170(3):713–716. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.3.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kent J. H. The epidemiology of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the United States. Med Clin North Am. 1993 Nov;77(6):1391–1409. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30200-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Longo M. C., Berninger M. S., Hartley J. L. Use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reactions. Gene. 1990 Sep 1;93(1):125–128. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90145-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mullis K. B., Faloona F. A. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:335–350. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Noordhoek G. T., Kolk A. H., Bjune G., Catty D., Dale J. W., Fine P. E., Godfrey-Faussett P., Cho S. N., Shinnick T., Svenson S. B. Sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a blind comparison study among seven laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):277–284. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.277-284.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Piot P., Plummer F. A., Mhalu F. S., Lamboray J. L., Chin J., Mann J. M. AIDS: an international perspective. Science. 1988 Feb 5;239(4840):573–579. doi: 10.1126/science.3277271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rastogi N. Emergence of multiple-drug-resistant tuberculosis: fundamental and applied research aspects, global issues and current strategies. Res Microbiol. 1993 Feb;144(2):103–103. doi: 10.1016/0923-2508(93)90022-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Saiki R. K., Scharf S., Faloona F., Mullis K. B., Horn G. T., Erlich H. A., Arnheim N. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985 Dec 20;230(4732):1350–1354. doi: 10.1126/science.2999980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sritharan V., Barker R. H., Jr A simple method for diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection in clinical samples using PCR. Mol Cell Probes. 1991 Oct;5(5):385–395. doi: 10.1016/s0890-8508(06)80011-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stahl D. A., Urbance J. W. The division between fast- and slow-growing species corresponds to natural relationships among the mycobacteria. J Bacteriol. 1990 Jan;172(1):116–124. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.1.116-124.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thierry D., Chureau C., Aznar C., Guesdon J. L. The detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in uncultured clinical specimens using the polymerase chain reaction and a non-radioactive DNA probe. Mol Cell Probes. 1992 Jun;6(3):181–191. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(92)90015-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vuorinen P., Miettinen A., Vuento R., Hällström O. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in respiratory specimens by Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Test. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1856–1859. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1856-1859.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yajko D. M., Wagner C., Tevere V. J., Kocagöz T., Hadley W. K., Chambers H. F. Quantitative culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical sputum specimens and dilution endpoint of its detection by the Amplicor PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jul;33(7):1944–1947. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1944-1947.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES