Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Sep 1;118(5):991–1002. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.991

Analysis of a developmentally regulated nuclear localization signal in Xenopus

PMCID: PMC2289585  PMID: 1387407

Abstract

The 289 residue nuclear oncoprotein encoded by the adenovirus 5 Ela gene contains two peptide sequences that behave as nuclear localization signals (NLS). One signal, located at the carboxy terminus, is like many other known NLSs in that it consists of a short stretch of basic residues (KRPRP) and is constitutively active in cells. The second signal resides within an internal 45 residue region of E1a that contains few basic residues or sequences that resemble other known NLSs. Moreover, this internal signal functions in injected Xenopus oocytes, but not in transfected Xenopus A6 cells, suggesting that it could be regulated developmentally (Slavicek et al. 1989. J. Virol. 63:4047). In this study, we show that the activity of this signal is sensitive to ATP depletion in vivo, efficiently directs the import of a 50 kD fusion protein and can compete with the E1a carboxy-terminal NLS for nuclear import. In addition, we have delineated the precise amino acid residues that comprise the second E1a NLS, and have assessed its utilization during Xenopus embryogenesis. Using amino acid deletion and substitution analyses, we show that the signal consists of the sequence FV(X)7-20MXSLXYM(X)4MF. By expressing in Xenopus embryos a truncated E1a protein that contains only the second NLS and by monitoring its cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution during development with indirect immunofluorescence, we find that the second NLS is utilized up to the early neurula stage. In addition, there appears to be a hierarchy among the embryonic germ layers as to when the second NLS becomes nonfunctional. For this reason, we refer to this NLS as the developmentally regulated nuclear localization signal (drNLS). The implications of these findings for early development are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adam S. A., Gerace L. Cytosolic proteins that specifically bind nuclear location signals are receptors for nuclear import. Cell. 1991 Sep 6;66(5):837–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90431-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akey C. W., Goldfarb D. S. Protein import through the nuclear pore complex is a multistep process. J Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;109(3):971–982. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Booher R. N., Alfa C. E., Hyams J. S., Beach D. H. The fission yeast cdc2/cdc13/suc1 protein kinase: regulation of catalytic activity and nuclear localization. Cell. 1989 Aug 11;58(3):485–497. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90429-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breeuwer M., Goldfarb D. S. Facilitated nuclear transport of histone H1 and other small nucleophilic proteins. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):999–1008. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90348-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Culp J. S., Webster L. C., Friedman D. J., Smith C. L., Huang W. J., Wu F. Y., Rosenberg M., Ricciardi R. P. The 289-amino acid E1A protein of adenovirus binds zinc in a region that is important for trans-activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6450–6454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Danielsen M., Northrop J. P., Ringold G. M. The mouse glucocorticoid receptor: mapping of functional domains by cloning, sequencing and expression of wild-type and mutant receptor proteins. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2513–2522. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04529.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dreyer C. Differential accumulation of oocyte nuclear proteins by embryonic nuclei of Xenopus. Development. 1987 Dec;101(4):829–846. doi: 10.1242/dev.101.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dreyer C. Fate and nuclear localization of germinal vesicle proteins during embryogenesis. Dev Biol (N Y 1985) 1989;6:31–57. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6820-9_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dworetzky S. I., Lanford R. E., Feldherr C. M. The effects of variations in the number and sequence of targeting signals on nuclear uptake. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1279–1287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Feldherr C. M., Kallenbach E., Schultz N. Movement of a karyophilic protein through the nuclear pores of oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2216–2222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fischer U., Darzynkiewicz E., Tahara S. M., Dathan N. A., Lührmann R., Mattaj I. W. Diversity in the signals required for nuclear accumulation of U snRNPs and variety in the pathways of nuclear transport. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(4):705–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.4.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao M., Knipe D. M. Distal protein sequences can affect the function of a nuclear localization signal. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1330–1339. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garcia-Bustos J., Heitman J., Hall M. N. Nuclear protein localization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Mar 7;1071(1):83–101. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(91)90013-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldfarb D. S., Gariépy J., Schoolnik G., Kornberg R. D. Synthetic peptides as nuclear localization signals. Nature. 1986 Aug 14;322(6080):641–644. doi: 10.1038/322641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hollenberg S. M., Weinberger C., Ong E. S., Cerelli G., Oro A., Lebo R., Thompson E. B., Rosenfeld M. G., Evans R. M. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature. 1985 Dec 19;318(6047):635–641. doi: 10.1038/318635a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunt T. Cytoplasmic anchoring proteins and the control of nuclear localization. Cell. 1989 Dec 22;59(6):949–951. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90747-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. James G., Olson E. Deletion of the regulatory domain of protein kinase C alpha exposes regions in the hinge and catalytic domains that mediate nuclear targeting. J Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;116(4):863–874. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.4.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jelsma T. N., Howe J. A., Mymryk J. S., Evelegh C. M., Cunniff N. F., Bayley S. T. Sequences in E1A proteins of human adenovirus 5 required for cell transformation, repression of a transcriptional enhancer, and induction of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Virology. 1989 Jul;171(1):120–130. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90518-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalderon D., Roberts B. L., Richardson W. D., Smith A. E. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):499–509. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Leptin M., Grunewald B. Cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Development. 1990 Sep;110(1):73–84. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lyons R. H., Ferguson B. Q., Rosenberg M. Pentapeptide nuclear localization signal in adenovirus E1a. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;7(7):2451–2456. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.7.2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Michaud N., Goldfarb D. S. Multiple pathways in nuclear transport: the import of U2 snRNP occurs by a novel kinetic pathway. J Cell Biol. 1991 Jan;112(2):215–223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.2.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Michaud N., Goldfarb D. Microinjected U snRNAs are imported to oocyte nuclei via the nuclear pore complex by three distinguishable targeting pathways. J Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;116(4):851–861. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miesfeld R., Rusconi S., Godowski P. J., Maler B. A., Okret S., Wikström A. C., Gustafsson J. A., Yamamoto K. R. Genetic complementation of a glucocorticoid receptor deficiency by expression of cloned receptor cDNA. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):389–399. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90659-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller M., Reddy B. A., Kloc M., Li X. X., Dreyer C., Etkin L. D. The nuclear-cytoplasmic distribution of the Xenopus nuclear factor, xnf7, coincides with its state of phosphorylation during early development. Development. 1991 Oct;113(2):569–575. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.2.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moll T., Tebb G., Surana U., Robitsch H., Nasmyth K. The role of phosphorylation and the CDC28 protein kinase in cell cycle-regulated nuclear import of the S. cerevisiae transcription factor SWI5. Cell. 1991 Aug 23;66(4):743–758. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90118-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Muller M., Renkawitz R. The glucocorticoid receptor. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Feb 16;1088(2):171–182. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90052-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nelson M., Silver P. Context affects nuclear protein localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;9(2):384–389. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.2.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Newmeyer D. D., Finlay D. R., Forbes D. J. In vitro transport of a fluorescent nuclear protein and exclusion of non-nuclear proteins. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2091–2102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Newmeyer D. D., Forbes D. J. Nuclear import can be separated into distinct steps in vitro: nuclear pore binding and translocation. Cell. 1988 Mar 11;52(5):641–653. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90402-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Newmeyer D. D., Lucocq J. M., Bürglin T. R., De Robertis E. M. Assembly in vitro of nuclei active in nuclear protein transport: ATP is required for nucleoplasmin accumulation. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):501–510. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Paine P. L., Feldherr C. M. Nucleocytoplasmic exchange of macromolecules. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Sep;74(1):81–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Picard D., Yamamoto K. R. Two signals mediate hormone-dependent nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 1987 Nov;6(11):3333–3340. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02654.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pines J., Hunter T. Human cyclins A and B1 are differentially located in the cell and undergo cell cycle-dependent nuclear transport. J Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;115(1):1–17. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Richardson W. D., Mills A. D., Dilworth S. M., Laskey R. A., Dingwall C. Nuclear protein migration involves two steps: rapid binding at the nuclear envelope followed by slower translocation through nuclear pores. Cell. 1988 Mar 11;52(5):655–664. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter J. D., Slavicek J. M., Schneider J. F., Jones N. C. Heterogeneity of adenovirus type 5 E1A proteins: multiple serine phosphorylations induce slow-migrating electrophoretic variants but do not affect E1A-induced transcriptional activation or transformation. J Virol. 1988 Jun;62(6):1948–1955. doi: 10.1128/jvi.62.6.1948-1955.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter J. D., Young P., Jones N. C., Krippl B., Rosenberg M., Ferguson B. A first exon-encoded domain of E1A sufficient for posttranslational modification, nuclear-localization, and induction of adenovirus E3 promoter expression in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8434–8438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rihs H. P., Jans D. A., Fan H., Peters R. The rate of nuclear cytoplasmic protein transport is determined by the casein kinase II site flanking the nuclear localization sequence of the SV40 T-antigen. EMBO J. 1991 Mar;10(3):633–639. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07991.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rihs H. P., Peters R. Nuclear transport kinetics depend on phosphorylation-site-containing sequences flanking the karyophilic signal of the Simian virus 40 T-antigen. EMBO J. 1989 May;8(5):1479–1484. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03531.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Robbins J., Dilworth S. M., Laskey R. A., Dingwall C. Two interdependent basic domains in nucleoplasmin nuclear targeting sequence: identification of a class of bipartite nuclear targeting sequence. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):615–623. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90245-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roth S., Stein D., Nüsslein-Volhard C. A gradient of nuclear localization of the dorsal protein determines dorsoventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1989 Dec 22;59(6):1189–1202. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90774-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Roux P., Blanchard J. M., Fernandez A., Lamb N., Jeanteur P., Piechaczyk M. Nuclear localization of c-Fos, but not v-Fos proteins, is controlled by extracellular signals. Cell. 1990 Oct 19;63(2):341–351. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90167-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rushlow C. A., Han K., Manley J. L., Levine M. The graded distribution of the dorsal morphogen is initiated by selective nuclear transport in Drosophila. Cell. 1989 Dec 22;59(6):1165–1177. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90772-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schmitz M. L., Henkel T., Baeuerle P. A. Proteins controlling the nuclear uptake of NF-kappa B, Rel and dorsal. Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;1(5):130–137. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90118-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schneider J. F., Fisher F., Goding C. R., Jones N. C. Mutational analysis of the adenovirus E1a gene: the role of transcriptional regulation in transformation. EMBO J. 1987 Jul;6(7):2053–2060. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02470.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shiurba R. A., Jing N., Sakakura T., Godsave S. F. Nuclear translocation of fibroblast growth factor during Xenopus mesoderm induction. Development. 1991 Oct;113(2):487–493. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.2.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Simon R., Richter J. D. The degradation sequence of adenovirus E1A consists of the amino-terminal tetrapeptide Met-Arg-His-Ile. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5609–5615. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Slack J. M. Growth factors as inducing agents in early Xenopus development. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1990;13:119–130. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1990.supplement_13.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Slavicek J. M., Jones N. C., Richter J. D. A karyophilic signal sequence in adenovirus type 5 E1A is functional in Xenopus oocytes but not in somatic cells. J Virol. 1989 Sep;63(9):4047–4050. doi: 10.1128/jvi.63.9.4047-4050.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Steward R. Relocalization of the dorsal protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus correlates with its function. Cell. 1989 Dec 22;59(6):1179–1188. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90773-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stochaj U., Osborne M., Kurihara T., Silver P. A yeast protein that binds nuclear localization signals: purification localization, and antibody inhibition of binding activity. J Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;113(6):1243–1254. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.6.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Webster L. C., Ricciardi R. P. trans-dominant mutants of E1A provide genetic evidence that the zinc finger of the trans-activating domain binds a transcription factor. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4287–4296. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wedlich D., Dreyer C. Cell specificity of nuclear protein antigens in the development of Xenopus species. Cell Tissue Res. 1988 Jun;252(3):479–489. doi: 10.1007/BF00216635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yamasaki L., Kanda P., Lanford R. E. Identification of four nuclear transport signal-binding proteins that interact with diverse transport signals. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;9(7):3028–3036. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.7.3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. van Zee K., Appel F., Fanning E. A hydrophobic protein sequence can override a nuclear localization signal independently of protein context. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5137–5146. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES