Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Oct 2;119(2):379–388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.379

Astral microtubules are not required for anaphase B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PMCID: PMC2289657  PMID: 1400581

Abstract

tub2-401 is a cold-sensitive allele of TUB2, the sole gene encoding beta-tubulin in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. At 18 degrees C, tub2-401 cells are able to assemble spindle microtubules but lack astral microtubules. Under these conditions, movement of the spindle to the bud neck is blocked. However, spindle elongation and chromosome separation are unimpeded and occur entirely within the mother cell. Subsequent cytokinesis produces one cell with two nuclei and one cell without a nucleus. The anucleate daughter can not bud. The binucleate daughter proceeds through another cell cycle to produce a cell with four nuclei and another anucleate cell. With additional time in the cold, the number of nuclei in the nucleated cells continues to increase and the percentage of anucleate cells in the population rises. The results indicate that astral microtubules are needed to position the spindle in the bud neck but are not required for spindle elongation at anaphase B. In addition, cell cycle progression does not depend on the location or orientation of the spindle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aist J. R., Bayles C. J., Tao W., Berns M. W. Direct experimental evidence for the existence, structural basis and function of astral forces during anaphase B in vivo. J Cell Sci. 1991 Oct;100(Pt 2):279–288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aist J. R., Berns M. W. Mechanics of chromosome separation during mitosis in Fusarium (Fungi imperfecti): new evidence from ultrastructural and laser microbeam experiments. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):446–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bajer A. S., Molè-Bajer J. Asters, poles, and transport properties within spindlelike microtubule arrays. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1982;46(Pt 1):263–283. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1982.046.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnette W. N. "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem. 1981 Apr;112(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cande W. Z., McDonald K. Physiological and ultrastructural analysis of elongating mitotic spindles reactivated in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):593–604. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis L. I., Fink G. R. The NUP1 gene encodes an essential component of the yeast nuclear pore complex. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):965–978. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90062-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hogan C. J., Cande W. Z. Antiparallel microtubule interactions: spindle formation and anaphase B. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1990;16(2):99–103. doi: 10.1002/cm.970160203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huffaker T. C., Thomas J. H., Botstein D. Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):1997–2010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Flow cytometric determinations of cellular substances in algae, bacteria, moulds and yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1978;44(3-4):269–282. doi: 10.1007/BF00394305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyman A. A., White J. G. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2123–2135. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobs C. W., Adams A. E., Szaniszlo P. J., Pringle J. R. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1409–1426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Katz W., Weinstein B., Solomon F. Regulation of tubulin levels and microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: consequences of altered tubulin gene copy number. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;10(10):5286–5294. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.10.5286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kemphues K. J., Kaufman T. C., Raff R. A., Raff E. C. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell. 1982 Dec;31(3 Pt 2):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90321-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McIntosh J. R., Hering G. E. Spindle fiber action and chromosome movement. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1991;7:403–426. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.07.110191.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McIntosh J. R., Koonce M. P. Mitosis. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):622–628. doi: 10.1126/science.2683078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitchison T. J. Mitosis: basic concepts. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;1(1):67–74. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(89)80039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peterson J. B., Ris H. Electron-microscopic study of the spindle and chromosome movement in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):219–242. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rieder C. L., Alexander S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sloat B. F., Pringle J. R. A mutant of yeast defective in cellular morphogenesis. Science. 1978 Jun 9;200(4346):1171–1173. doi: 10.1126/science.349694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Winey M., Goetsch L., Baum P., Byers B. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES