Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Nov 1;119(3):583–593. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.583

Role of astral microtubules and actin in spindle orientation and migration in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

PMCID: PMC2289680  PMID: 1400594

Abstract

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, before the onset of anaphase, the spindle apparatus is always positioned with one spindle pole at, or through, the neck between the mother cell and the growing bud. This spindle orientation enables proper chromosome segregation to occur during anaphase, allowing one replicated genome to be segregated into the bud and the other to remain in the mother cell. In this study, we synchronized a population of cells before the onset of anaphase such that > 90% of the cells in the population had spindles with the correct orientation, and then disrupted specific cytoskeletal elements using temperature-sensitive mutations. Disruption of either the astral microtubules or actin function resulted in improper spindle orientation in approximately 40-50% of the cells. When cells with disrupted astral microtubules or actin function entered into anaphase, there was a 100- 200-fold increase in the frequency of binucleated cell bodies. Thus, the maintenance of proper spindle orientation by these cytoskeletal elements was essential for proper chromosome segregation. These data are consistent with the model that proper spindle orientation is maintained by directly or indirectly tethering the astral microtubules to the actin cytoskeleton. After nuclear migration, but before anaphase, bulk chromosome movement occurs within the nucleus apparently because the chromosomes are attached to a mobile spindle. The frequency and magnitude of bulk chromosome movement is greatly diminished by disruption of the astral microtubules but not by disruption of the nonkinetochore spindle microtubules. These results suggest that astral microtubules are not only important for spindle orientation before anaphase, but they also mediate force on the spindle, generating spindle displacement and in turn chromosome movement. Potential roles for this force in spindle assembly and orientation are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aist J. R., Bayles C. J., Tao W., Berns M. W. Direct experimental evidence for the existence, structural basis and function of astral forces during anaphase B in vivo. J Cell Sci. 1991 Oct;100(Pt 2):279–288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.2.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aist J. R., Berns M. W. Mechanics of chromosome separation during mitosis in Fusarium (Fungi imperfecti): new evidence from ultrastructural and laser microbeam experiments. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):446–458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ault J. G., Nicklas R. B. Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma. 1989 Jun;98(1):33–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00293332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeke J. D. One and two codon insertion mutants of bacteriophage f1. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;181(3):288–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00425599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Byers B., Goetsch L. Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):511–523. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.1.511-523.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Byers B., Goetsch L. Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1974;38:123–131. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Kinetochore microtubules shorten by loss of subunits at the kinetochores of prometaphase chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1991 Feb;98(Pt 2):151–158. doi: 10.1242/jcs.98.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dan K., Tanaka Y. Attachment of one spindle pole to the cortex in unequal cleavage. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;582:108–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb21672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunn T. M., Shortle D. Null alleles of SAC7 suppress temperature-sensitive actin mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2308–2314. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartwell L. H. Sequential function of gene products relative to DNA synthesis in the yeast cell cycle. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jul 15;104(4):803–817. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill D. P., Strome S. An analysis of the role of microfilaments in the establishment and maintenance of asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans zygotes. Dev Biol. 1988 Jan;125(1):75–84. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hill D. P., Strome S. Brief cytochalasin-induced disruption of microfilaments during a critical interval in 1-cell C. elegans embryos alters the partitioning of developmental instructions to the 2-cell embryo. Development. 1990 Jan;108(1):159–172. doi: 10.1242/dev.108.1.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huffaker T. C., Thomas J. H., Botstein D. Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):1997–2010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hyman A. A. Centrosome movement in the early divisions of Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position. J Cell Biol. 1989 Sep;109(3):1185–1193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacobs C. W., Adams A. E., Szaniszlo P. J., Pringle J. R. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1409–1426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karr T. L., Alberts B. M. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kellogg D. R., Mitchison T. J., Alberts B. M. Behaviour of microtubules and actin filaments in living Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Aug;103(4):675–686. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.4.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim H. B., Haarer B. K., Pringle J. R. Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):535–544. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koshland D., Hartwell L. H. The structure of sister minichromosome DNA before anaphase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1987 Dec 18;238(4834):1713–1716. doi: 10.1126/science.3317838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lutz D. A., Hamaguchi Y., Inoué S. Micromanipulation studies of the asymmetric positioning of the maturation spindle in Chaetopterus sp. oocytes: I. Anchorage of the spindle to the cortex and migration of a displaced spindle. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;11(2):83–96. doi: 10.1002/cm.970110202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meluh P. B., Rose M. D. KAR3, a kinesin-related gene required for yeast nuclear fusion. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):1029–1041. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90351-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mortimer R. K., Contopoulou R., Schild D. Mitotic chromosome loss in a radiation-sensitive strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5778–5782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicklas R. B., Koch C. A. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1969 Oct;43(1):40–50. doi: 10.1083/jcb.43.1.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Novick P., Botstein D. Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive yeast actin mutants. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):405–416. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Palmer R. E., Koval M., Koshland D. The dynamics of chromosome movement in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 2):3355–3366. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peterson J. B., Ris H. Electron-microscopic study of the spindle and chromosome movement in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1976 Nov;22(2):219–242. doi: 10.1242/jcs.22.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rothstein R. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:281–301. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shero J. H., Koval M., Spencer F., Palmer R. E., Hieter P., Koshland D. Analysis of chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:749–773. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94057-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Staiger C. J., Lloyd C. W. The plant cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;3(1):33–42. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90163-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sullivan D. S., Huffaker T. C. Astral microtubules are not required for anaphase B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;119(2):379–388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vallee R. B., Shpetner H. S. Motor proteins of cytoplasmic microtubules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:909–932. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vallee R. B., Shpetner H. S., Paschal B. M. The role of dynein and other microtubule-activated ATPases in mitosis. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;318:205–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Winey M., Goetsch L., Baum P., Byers B. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES