Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Dec 2;119(6):1589–1596. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.6.1589

Directional instability of microtubule transport in the presence of kinesin and dynein, two opposite polarity motor proteins

PMCID: PMC2289742  PMID: 1469050

Abstract

Kinesin and dynein are motor proteins that move in opposite directions along microtubules. In this study, we examine the consequences of having kinesin and dynein (ciliary outer arm or cytoplasmic) bound to glass surfaces interacting with the same microtubule in vitro. Although one might expect a balance of opposing forces to produce little or no net movement, we find instead that microtubules move unidirectionally for several microns (corresponding to hundreds of ATPase cycles by a motor) but continually switch between kinesin-directed and dynein- directed transport. The velocities in the plus-end (0.2-0.3 microns/s) and minus-end (3.5-4 microns/s) directions were approximately half those produced by kinesin (0.5 microns/s) and ciliary dynein (6.7 microns/s) alone, indicating that the motors not contributing to movement can interact with and impose a drag upon the microtubule. By comparing two dyneins with different duty ratios (percentage of time spent in a strongly bound state during the ATPase cycle) and varying the nucleotide conditions, we show that the microtubule attachment times of the two opposing motors as well as their relative numbers determine which motor predominates in this assay. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which kinesin-induced movement of a microtubule induces a negative strain in attached dyneins which causes them to dissociate before entering a force-generating state (and vice versa); reversals in the direction of transport may require the temporary dissociation of the transporting motor from the microtubule. The bidirectional movements described here are also remarkably similar to the back-and-forth movements of chromosomes during mitosis and membrane vesicles in fibroblasts. These results suggest that the underlying mechanical properties of motor proteins, at least in part, may be responsible for reversals in microtubule-based transport observed in cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., Metuzals J., Tasaki I., Brady S. T., Gilbert S. P. Fast axonal transport in squid giant axon. Science. 1982 Dec 10;218(4577):1127–1129. doi: 10.1126/science.6183744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajer A. S. Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):33–48. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Block S. M., Goldstein L. S., Schnapp B. J. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):348–352. doi: 10.1038/348348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hackney D. D. Kinesin ATPase: rate-limiting ADP release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6314–6318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hays T. S., Wise D., Salmon E. D. Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):374–389. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herman B., Albertini D. F. A time-lapse video image intensification analysis of cytoplasmic organelle movements during endosome translocation. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):565–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J., Vale R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989 Nov 9;342(6246):154–158. doi: 10.1038/342154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huxley A. F. A note suggesting that the cross-bridge attachment during muscle contraction may take place in two stages. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973 Feb 27;183(1070):83–86. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1973.0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hyman A. A., Middleton K., Centola M., Mitchison T. J., Carbon J. Microtubule-motor activity of a yeast centromere-binding protein complex. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):533–536. doi: 10.1038/359533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hyman A. A., Mitchison T. J. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. doi: 10.1038/351206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyman A. A. Preparation of marked microtubules for the assay of the polarity of microtubule-based motors by fluorescence. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1991;14:125–127. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1991.supplement_14.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson K. A. Preparation and properties of dynein from Tetrahymena cilia. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:306–317. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamimura S., Takahashi K. Direct measurement of the force of microtubule sliding in flagella. Nature. 1981 Oct 15;293(5833):566–568. doi: 10.1038/293566a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kishino A., Yanagida T. Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):74–76. doi: 10.1038/334074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kosik K. S., Orecchio L. D., Schnapp B., Inouye H., Neve R. L. The primary structure and analysis of the squid kinesin heavy chain. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 25;265(6):3278–3283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDonald H. B., Stewart R. J., Goldstein L. S. The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1159–1165. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paschal B. M., Vallee R. B. Retrograde transport by the microtubule-associated protein MAP 1C. Nature. 1987 Nov 12;330(6144):181–183. doi: 10.1038/330181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pfarr C. M., Coue M., Grissom P. M., Hays T. S., Porter M. E., McIntosh J. R. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):263–265. doi: 10.1038/345263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pryer N. K., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Polarized microtubule gliding and particle saltations produced by soluble factors from sea urchin eggs and embryos. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1986;6(6):537–548. doi: 10.1002/cm.970060602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rozdzial M. M., Haimo L. T. Bidirectional pigment granule movements of melanophores are regulated by protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Cell. 1986 Dec 26;47(6):1061–1070. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90821-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sale W. S., Satir P. Direction of active sliding of microtubules in Tetrahymena cilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 May;74(5):2045–2049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.5.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schnapp B. J., Reese T. S. Dynein is the motor for retrograde axonal transport of organelles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(5):1548–1552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.5.1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schroer T. A., Sheetz M. P. Functions of microtubule-based motors. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:629–652. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.53.030191.003213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheetz M. P., Block S. M., Spudich J. A. Myosin movement in vitro: a quantitative assay using oriented actin cables from Nitella. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:531–544. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34118-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Steuer E. R., Wordeman L., Schroer T. A., Sheetz M. P. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature. 1990 May 17;345(6272):266–268. doi: 10.1038/345266a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tawada K., Sekimoto K. Protein friction exerted by motor enzymes through a weak-binding interaction. J Theor Biol. 1991 May 21;150(2):193–200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80331-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vale R. D., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80099-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vale R. D., Schnapp B. J., Mitchison T., Steuer E., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Different axoplasmic proteins generate movement in opposite directions along microtubules in vitro. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):623–632. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90234-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vale R. D., Soll D. R., Gibbons I. R. One-dimensional diffusion of microtubules bound to flagellar dynein. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):915–925. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90614-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vale R. D., Toyoshima Y. Y. Microtubule translocation properties of intact and proteolytically digested dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;108(6):2327–2334. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.6.2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vale R. D., Toyoshima Y. Y. Rotation and translocation of microtubules in vitro induced by dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia. Cell. 1988 Feb 12;52(3):459–469. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vallee R. B., Shpetner H. S. Motor proteins of cytoplasmic microtubules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:909–932. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker R. A., Salmon E. D., Endow S. A. The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule. Nature. 1990 Oct 25;347(6295):780–782. doi: 10.1038/347780a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weiss D. G., Keller F., Gulden J., Maile W. Towards a new classification of intracellular particle movements based on quantitative analyses. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1986;6(2):128–135. doi: 10.1002/cm.970060210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yen T. J., Li G., Schaar B. T., Szilak I., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):536–539. doi: 10.1038/359536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES