Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1992 Dec 2;119(6):1625–1639. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.6.1625

Mutations in yeast calmodulin cause defects in spindle pole body functions and nuclear integrity

PMCID: PMC2289758  PMID: 1469052

Abstract

Yeast calmodulin (CaM) is required for the progression of nuclear division (Ohya, Y. and Y. Anraku. 1989. Curr. Genet. 15:113-120), although the precise mechanism and physiological role of CaM in this process are unclear. In this paper we have characterized the phenotype caused by a temperature-sensitive lethal mutation (cmdl-101) in the yeast CaM. The cmdl-101 mutation expresses a carboxyl-terminal half of the yeast CaM (Met72-Cys147) under the control of an inducible GAL1 promoter. Incubation of the cmdl-101 cells at a nonpermissive temperature causes a severe defect in chromosome segregation. The rate of chromosome loss in the cmdl-101 mutant is higher than wild-type cell even at permissive temperature. The primary visible defect observed by immunofluorescence and electron microscopic analyses is that the organization of spindle microtubules is abnormal in the cmdl-101 cells grown at nonpermissive temperature. Majority of budded cells arrested at the high temperature contain only one spindle pole body (SPB), which forms monopolar spindle, whereas the budded cells of the same strain incubated at permissive temperature all contain two SPBs. Using the freeze-substituted fixation method, we found that the integrity of the nuclear morphology of the cmdl-101 mutant cell is significantly disturbed. The nucleus in wild-type cells is round with smooth contours of nuclear envelope. However, the nuclear envelope in the mutant cells appears to be very flexible and forms irregular projections and invaginations that are never seen in wild-type cells. The deformation of the nuclear becomes much more severe as the incubation at nonpermissive temperature continues. The single SPB frequently localizes on the projections or the invaginations of the nuclear envelope. These observations suggest that CaM is required for the functions of SPB and spindle, and the integrity of nucleus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anraku Y., Ohya Y., Iida H. Cell cycle control by calcium and calmodulin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Jul 10;1093(2-3):169–177. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(91)90119-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baba M., Baba N., Ohsumi Y., Kanaya K., Osumi M. Three-dimensional analysis of morphogenesis induced by mating pheromone alpha factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1989 Oct;94(Pt 2):207–216. doi: 10.1242/jcs.94.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Babu Y. S., Bugg C. E., Cook W. J. Structure of calmodulin refined at 2.2 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 5;204(1):191–204. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90608-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Babu Y. S., Sack J. S., Greenhough T. J., Bugg C. E., Means A. R., Cook W. J. Three-dimensional structure of calmodulin. Nature. 1985 May 2;315(6014):37–40. doi: 10.1038/315037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum P., Furlong C., Byers B. Yeast gene required for spindle pole body duplication: homology of its product with Ca2+-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(15):5512–5516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.15.5512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baum P., Yip C., Goetsch L., Byers B. A yeast gene essential for regulation of spindle pole duplication. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;8(12):5386–5397. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.12.5386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boeke J. D., Trueheart J., Natsoulis G., Fink G. R. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 1987;154:164–175. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)54076-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brady R. C., Cabral F., Dedman J. R. Identification of a 52-kD calmodulin-binding protein associated with the mitotic spindle apparatus in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1855–1861. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Broek D., Bartlett R., Crawford K., Nurse P. Involvement of p34cdc2 in establishing the dependency of S phase on mitosis. Nature. 1991 Jan 31;349(6308):388–393. doi: 10.1038/349388a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Byers B., Goetsch L. Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):511–523. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.1.511-523.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Byers B., Shriver K., Goetsch L. The role of spindle pole bodies and modified microtubule ends in the initiation of microtubule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1978 Apr;30:331–352. doi: 10.1242/jcs.30.1.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carle G. F., Olson M. V. An electrophoretic karyotype for yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jun;82(11):3756–3760. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carle G. F., Olson M. V. Separation of chromosomal DNA molecules from yeast by orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 25;12(14):5647–5664. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.14.5647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis T. N., Thorner J. Vertebrate and yeast calmodulin, despite significant sequence divergence, are functionally interchangeable. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(20):7909–7913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Davis T. N., Urdea M. S., Masiarz F. R., Thorner J. Isolation of the yeast calmodulin gene: calmodulin is an essential protein. Cell. 1986 Nov 7;47(3):423–431. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90599-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartwell L. H. Cell division from a genetic perspective. J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):627–637. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartwell L. H. Genetic control of the cell division cycle in yeast. II. Genes controlling DNA replication and its initiation. J Mol Biol. 1971 Jul 14;59(1):183–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90420-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston M., Davis R. W. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1440–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston M., Davis R. W. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1440–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanbe T., Kobayashi I., Tanaka K. Dynamics of cytoplasmic organelles in the cell cycle of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe: three-dimensional reconstruction from serial sections. J Cell Sci. 1989 Dec;94(Pt 4):647–656. doi: 10.1242/jcs.94.4.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kilmartin J. V., Wright B., Milstein C. Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):576–582. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuroiwa T., Miyamura S., Kawano S., Hizume M., Tho-E A., Miyakawa I., Sando N. Cytological characterization of NOR in the bivalent of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Jul;165(1):199–206. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90544-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Margolis R. L., Rauch C. T., Job D. Purification and assay of a 145-kDa protein (STOP145) with microtubule-stabilizing and motility behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(3):639–643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nisogi H., Kominami K., Tanaka K., Toh-e A. A new essential gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a defect in it may result in instability of nucleus. Exp Cell Res. 1992 May;200(1):48–57. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(05)80070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ohya Y., Anraku Y. A galactose-dependent cmd1 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of calmodulin in nuclear division. Curr Genet. 1989 Feb;15(2):113–120. doi: 10.1007/BF00435457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohya Y., Anraku Y. Functional expression of chicken calmodulin in yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989 Jan 31;158(2):541–547. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(89)80083-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohya Y., Kawasaki H., Suzuki K., Londesborough J., Anraku Y. Two yeast genes encoding calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Isolation, sequencing and bacterial expressions of CMK1 and CMK2. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jul 5;266(19):12784–12794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ohya Y., Uno I., Ishikawa T., Anraku Y. Purification and biochemical properties of calmodulin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Oct 1;168(1):13–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pabion M., Job D., Margolis R. L. Sliding of STOP proteins on microtubules. Biochemistry. 1984 Dec 18;23(26):6642–6648. doi: 10.1021/bi00321a055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rasmussen C. D., Means A. R. Calmodulin is involved in regulation of cell proliferation. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3961–3968. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02738.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rasmussen C. D., Means A. R. Calmodulin is required for cell-cycle progression during G1 and mitosis. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):73–82. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03350.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rasmussen C. D., Means R. L., Lu K. P., May G. S., Means A. R. Characterization and expression of the unique calmodulin gene of Aspergillus nidulans. J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 15;265(23):13767–13775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rose M. D., Fink G. R. KAR1, a gene required for function of both intranuclear and extranuclear microtubules in yeast. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90712-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schild D., Ananthaswamy H. N., Mortimer R. K. An endomitotic effect of a cell cycle mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):551–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shero J. H., Koval M., Spencer F., Palmer R. E., Hieter P., Koshland D. Analysis of chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:749–773. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94057-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stearns T., Botstein D. Unlinked noncomplementation: isolation of new conditional-lethal mutations in each of the tubulin genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Jun;119(2):249–260. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.2.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stearns T., Hoyt M. A., Botstein D. Yeast mutants sensitive to antimicrotubule drugs define three genes that affect microtubule function. Genetics. 1990 Feb;124(2):251–262. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.2.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sun G. H., Ohya Y., Anraku Y. Half-calmodulin is sufficient for cell proliferation. Expressions of N- and C-terminal halves of calmodulin in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1991 Apr 15;266(11):7008–7015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sweet S. C., Rogers C. M., Welsh M. J. Calmodulin stabilization of kinetochore microtubule structure to the effect of nocodazole. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 1):2243–2251. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Takeda T., Yamamoto M. Analysis and in vivo disruption of the gene coding for calmodulin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(11):3580–3584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.11.3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas J. H., Botstein D. A gene required for the separation of chromosomes on the spindle apparatus in yeast. Cell. 1986 Jan 17;44(1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vollrath D., Davis R. W., Connelly C., Hieter P. Physical mapping of large DNA by chromosome fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6027–6031. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.6027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Welsh M. J., Dedman J. R., Brinkley B. R., Means A. R. Calcium-dependent regulator protein: localization in mitotic apparatus of eukaryotic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Apr;75(4):1867–1871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.4.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Welsh M. J., Dedman J. R., Brinkley B. R., Means A. R. Tubulin and calmodulin. Effects of microtubule and microfilament inhibitors on localization in the mitotic apparatus. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jun;81(3):624–634. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Winey M., Goetsch L., Baum P., Byers B. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):745–754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zavortink M., Welsh M. J., McIntosh J. R. The distribution of calmodulin in living mitotic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1983 Dec;149(2):375–385. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90350-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES